Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karsten Merker <karsten@excalibur.cologne.de>
To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: New binutils for kernel
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:27:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020820172724.GA599@excalibur.cologne.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020820162959.A26852@linux-mips.org>

On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:29:59PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:

[requiring binutils 2.13]]

> Yep.  It won't hurt most of us kernel hackers very much but in particular
> the distribution people may want to comment.

Well, I guess that covers me :-).

Debian Woody, the current stable Debian release (AFAIK the only full-blown
distribution for Linux/mips that targets at "normal users" and not only at
developers) ships with binutils 2.12.90.0.1. As the Debian policy requires
that no new program versions are to be introduced for the stable release,
Debian will not be able to switch to binutils 2.13 there. Bugfixes for
packages in the release are accepted, but not new upstream versions; so to
get any fixes in, they would need to be backported to binutils 2.12.

For the unstable distribution (currently binutils 2.12.90.0.15), switching
to binutils 2.13 should IMHO be possible in a reasonable timeframe, if it
does not break other things. Caveat: as Debian requires all 11 released
architectures to be in sync, any new version would have to work properly on
_all_ supported platforms. The decision about introducing a new version of a
package into Debian is taken by the package maintainer, so I am going to ask
him about his plans.

Regards,
Karsten
-- 
#include <standard_disclaimer>
Nach Paragraph 28 Abs. 3 Bundesdatenschutzgesetz widerspreche ich der Nutzung
oder Uebermittlung meiner Daten fuer Werbezwecke oder fuer die Markt- oder
Meinungsforschung.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2002-08-20 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20020819171238.A7457@linux-mips.org>
     [not found] ` <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020820161204.8700H-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
2002-08-20 14:29   ` New binutils for kernel Ralf Baechle
2002-08-20 14:50     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-20 14:58       ` Ralf Baechle
2002-08-20 15:02         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-20 15:08         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-08-20 15:11           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-20 15:17             ` Ralf Baechle
2002-08-20 15:10         ` H. J. Lu
2002-08-20 17:27     ` Karsten Merker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020820172724.GA599@excalibur.cologne.de \
    --to=karsten@excalibur.cologne.de \
    --cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox