From: Jeff Baitis <baitisj@evolution.com>
To: Hartvig Ekner <hartvig@ekner.info>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@mandrakesoft.com>,
Linux MIPS mailing list <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Patches for all four au1000 setup.c files
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:04:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030324180446.S26687@luca.pas.lab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E7B9615.FB66BF53@ekner.info>; from hartvig@ekner.info on Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:45:41PM +0100
Yes. mb() was at the heart of the problem.
I've applied the patches that remove wbflush, and de-configured my .config,
and everything is compiling just fine!
Thanks,
Jeff
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:45:41PM +0100, Hartvig Ekner wrote:
> Hi Juan,
>
> Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> > >>>>> "hartvig" == Hartvig Ekner <hartvig@ekner.info> writes:
> >
> > hartvig> I can't see that they are using wbflush in any way. Grepping
> > hartvig> after wbflush through the entire 2.4 tree, it seems wbflush
> > hartvig> is something only present on some dec platforms and then the
> > hartvig> au1000 stuff - which would mean that any driver directly
> > hartvig> calling __wbflush would be unable to compile/load on the
> > hartvig> majority of kernels. Or am I missing something? (I haven't
> > hartvig> been using modules under MIPS at all).
> >
> > Yes, you missed the definition of mb() :p
> >
> > quintela$ grep "mb(" drivers/net/8139* | grep -v rmb | grep -v wmb
> > drivers/net/8139too.c: mb();
> > quintela$
> >
> > hartvig> In fact, I can't find a single file including wbflush.h
> > hartvig> except system.h, and it doesn't look like anybody else should
> > hartvig> directly be including the wbflush.h file, but only use the
> > hartvig> macros in system.h:
> >
> > hartvig> #define wmb() fast_wmb()
> > hartvig> #define rmb() fast_rmb()
> > hartvig> #define mb() wbflush();
> > hartvig> #define iob() wbflush();
> >
> > hartvig> (which are differently defined if there is no WB configured).
> >
> > but WB is configured in :)
> >
>
> That's the problem! Wb does not need to be configured in, it is a mistake. My patch was missing
> the required fixes to the defconfig files, it was only described in the mail. So I think the only
> thing missing is a patch to fix all the pb/db defconfig files to look like this:
>
> # CONFIG_CPU_ADVANCED is not set
> CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLSC=y
> # CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLDSCD is not set
> # CONFIG_CPU_HAS_WB is not set
> CONFIG_CPU_HAS_SYNC=y
>
> ... which is the setting also used by all other MIPS32 CPUs. Then everything should be ok.
>
> /Hartvig
>
> >
> > quintela$ grep WB arch/mips/defconfig-pb1*
> > arch/mips/defconfig-pb1000:CONFIG_CPU_HAS_WB=y
> > arch/mips/defconfig-pb1100:CONFIG_CPU_HAS_WB=y
> > arch/mips/defconfig-pb1500:CONFIG_CPU_HAS_WB=y
> > quintela$
> >
> > Other thing is that this machine should be using wbflush at all, but
> > that is a different story. I agree with (/me looks in archive),
> > *your* patch removing wbflush for that boards. They are only doing
> > "sync" ond wbflush, and that is the thing that __sync() already does.
> >
> > I.e. If I have to chooses wich patch to integrate, the one exporting
> > __wbflush(), or the one removing it altogether from pb1*, I will
> > choose removing it. It looks superflous.
> >
> > Later, Juan "who don't have that processor, and handwaving is easy".
> >
> > --
> > In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
> > are different -- Larry McVoy
>
--
Jeffrey Baitis - Associate Software Engineer
Evolution Robotics, Inc.
130 West Union Street
Pasadena CA 91103
tel: 626.535.2776 | fax: 626.535.2777 | baitisj@evolution.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-25 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-21 8:55 Patches for all four au1000 setup.c files Hartvig Ekner
2003-03-21 15:58 ` Pete Popov
2003-03-21 19:39 ` Jeff Baitis
2003-03-21 22:12 ` Hartvig Ekner
2003-03-21 22:33 ` Juan Quintela
2003-03-21 22:45 ` Hartvig Ekner
2003-03-25 2:04 ` Jeff Baitis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030324180446.S26687@luca.pas.lab \
--to=baitisj@evolution.com \
--cc=hartvig@ekner.info \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=quintela@mandrakesoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox