From: Juan Quintela <quintela@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Hartvig Ekner <hartvig@ekner.info>
Cc: baitisj@evolution.com,
Linux MIPS mailing list <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Patches for all four au1000 setup.c files
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:33:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86fzpgpcy6.fsf@trasno.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E7B8E39.CC463FEC@ekner.info> (Hartvig Ekner's message of "Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:12:09 +0100")
>>>>> "hartvig" == Hartvig Ekner <hartvig@ekner.info> writes:
hartvig> I can't see that they are using wbflush in any way. Grepping
hartvig> after wbflush through the entire 2.4 tree, it seems wbflush
hartvig> is something only present on some dec platforms and then the
hartvig> au1000 stuff - which would mean that any driver directly
hartvig> calling __wbflush would be unable to compile/load on the
hartvig> majority of kernels. Or am I missing something? (I haven't
hartvig> been using modules under MIPS at all).
Yes, you missed the definition of mb() :p
quintela$ grep "mb(" drivers/net/8139* | grep -v rmb | grep -v wmb
drivers/net/8139too.c: mb();
quintela$
hartvig> In fact, I can't find a single file including wbflush.h
hartvig> except system.h, and it doesn't look like anybody else should
hartvig> directly be including the wbflush.h file, but only use the
hartvig> macros in system.h:
hartvig> #define wmb() fast_wmb()
hartvig> #define rmb() fast_rmb()
hartvig> #define mb() wbflush();
hartvig> #define iob() wbflush();
hartvig> (which are differently defined if there is no WB configured).
but WB is configured in :)
quintela$ grep WB arch/mips/defconfig-pb1*
arch/mips/defconfig-pb1000:CONFIG_CPU_HAS_WB=y
arch/mips/defconfig-pb1100:CONFIG_CPU_HAS_WB=y
arch/mips/defconfig-pb1500:CONFIG_CPU_HAS_WB=y
quintela$
Other thing is that this machine should be using wbflush at all, but
that is a different story. I agree with (/me looks in archive),
*your* patch removing wbflush for that boards. They are only doing
"sync" ond wbflush, and that is the thing that __sync() already does.
I.e. If I have to chooses wich patch to integrate, the one exporting
__wbflush(), or the one removing it altogether from pb1*, I will
choose removing it. It looks superflous.
Later, Juan "who don't have that processor, and handwaving is easy".
--
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
are different -- Larry McVoy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-21 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-21 8:55 Patches for all four au1000 setup.c files Hartvig Ekner
2003-03-21 15:58 ` Pete Popov
2003-03-21 19:39 ` Jeff Baitis
2003-03-21 22:12 ` Hartvig Ekner
2003-03-21 22:33 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2003-03-21 22:45 ` Hartvig Ekner
2003-03-25 2:04 ` Jeff Baitis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86fzpgpcy6.fsf@trasno.mitica \
--to=quintela@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=baitisj@evolution.com \
--cc=hartvig@ekner.info \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox