Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Hartvig Ekner <hartvig@ekner.info>
Cc: baitisj@evolution.com,
	Linux MIPS mailing list <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Patches for all four au1000 setup.c files
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:33:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86fzpgpcy6.fsf@trasno.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E7B8E39.CC463FEC@ekner.info> (Hartvig Ekner's message of "Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:12:09 +0100")

>>>>> "hartvig" == Hartvig Ekner <hartvig@ekner.info> writes:


hartvig> I can't see that they are using wbflush in any way. Grepping
hartvig> after wbflush through the entire 2.4 tree, it seems wbflush
hartvig> is something only present on some dec platforms and then the
hartvig> au1000 stuff - which would mean that any driver directly
hartvig> calling __wbflush would be unable to compile/load on the
hartvig> majority of kernels. Or am I missing something? (I haven't
hartvig> been using modules under MIPS at all).

Yes, you missed the definition of mb() :p

quintela$ grep "mb(" drivers/net/8139* | grep -v rmb | grep -v wmb
drivers/net/8139too.c:          mb();
quintela$ 


hartvig> In fact, I can't find a single file including wbflush.h
hartvig> except system.h, and it doesn't look like anybody else should
hartvig> directly be including the wbflush.h file, but only use the
hartvig> macros in system.h:

hartvig> #define wmb()           fast_wmb()
hartvig> #define rmb()           fast_rmb()
hartvig> #define mb()            wbflush();
hartvig> #define iob()           wbflush();

hartvig> (which are differently defined if there is no WB configured).

but WB is configured in :)

quintela$ grep WB arch/mips/defconfig-pb1*
arch/mips/defconfig-pb1000:CONFIG_CPU_HAS_WB=y
arch/mips/defconfig-pb1100:CONFIG_CPU_HAS_WB=y
arch/mips/defconfig-pb1500:CONFIG_CPU_HAS_WB=y
quintela$ 

Other thing is that this machine should be using wbflush at all, but
that is a different story.  I agree with  (/me looks in archive),
*your* patch removing wbflush for that boards.  They are only doing
"sync" ond wbflush, and that is the thing that __sync() already does.

I.e. If I have to chooses wich patch to integrate, the one exporting
__wbflush(), or the one removing it altogether from pb1*, I will
choose removing it.  It looks superflous.

Later, Juan "who don't have that processor, and handwaving is easy".

-- 
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they 
are different -- Larry McVoy

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-21 22:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-21  8:55 Patches for all four au1000 setup.c files Hartvig Ekner
2003-03-21 15:58 ` Pete Popov
2003-03-21 19:39 ` Jeff Baitis
2003-03-21 22:12   ` Hartvig Ekner
2003-03-21 22:33     ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2003-03-21 22:45       ` Hartvig Ekner
2003-03-25  2:04         ` Jeff Baitis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86fzpgpcy6.fsf@trasno.mitica \
    --to=quintela@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=baitisj@evolution.com \
    --cc=hartvig@ekner.info \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox