From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Dominic Sweetman <dom@mips.com>
Cc: Mike Uhler <uhler@mips.com>, Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: way selection bit for multi-way cache
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:35:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030411133557.A23640@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16022.24992.314581.716649@gladsmuir.mips.com>; from dom@mips.com on Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 07:33:04AM +0100
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 07:33:04AM +0100, Dominic Sweetman wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what you mean by TLB translations required for hit
> > > cacheops. If you mean the Index Writeback or Index Invalidate
> > > functions, note that you can (and should) use a kseg0 address to
> > > do this.
>
> Mike was proposing a kseg0 address translating to the right physical
> address, and used with a hit-type cacheop. I believe Ralf (and Linux)
> are just assuming that's no good because it doesn't work if you have
> cacheable memory above 512Mbytes physical address.
>
> I wonder whether anything really bad would happen if you temporarily
> changed the (machine) ASID to that of the address space you wanted to
> invalidate?
There are non-trivial race conditions related to the IPI mechanism used
on multi-processors when attempting this. The easy fix would be
temporarily disabling interrupts - but of course that's undesireable as
well.
Ralf
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-11 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-10 18:05 way selection bit for multi-way cache Jun Sun
2003-04-10 18:50 ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 18:55 ` Jun Sun
2003-04-10 19:24 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-10 19:37 ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 19:37 ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 20:09 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-10 20:28 ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 20:28 ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 20:52 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-11 6:33 ` Dominic Sweetman
2003-04-11 8:15 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2003-04-11 8:15 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2003-04-11 12:10 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-11 11:35 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030411133557.A23640@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=dom@mips.com \
--cc=jsun@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=uhler@mips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox