Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mike Uhler" <uhler@mips.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Mike Uhler <uhler@mips.com>, Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: uhler@mips.com
Subject: Re: way selection bit for multi-way cache
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:37:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200304101937.h3AJbl211418@uhler-linux.mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:24:30 +0200." <20030410212430.A519@linux-mips.org>

> On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:50:53AM -0700, Mike Uhler wrote:
> 
> > I can't comment on anything but MIPS32 and MIPS64 CPUs, but the
> > MIPS32 and MIPS64 standard is to use the bits above the index field
> > to specify the way.  See the figure entitled "Usage of Address Fields
> > to Select Index and Way" in the CACHE instruction description of the
> > MIPS32 and MIPS64 Architecture for Programmer's manuals.
> 
> The question came up between Jun and me when revising the way of handling
> multi-way caches.  There is the MIPS32 / MIPS64 way of selecting the
> cache way - but that scheme was originally already introduced by the
> R4600.  The second somewhat less common scheme is using the lowest bits
> of the address.  That was originally introduced with the R10000 but a
> few other processors such as the R5432 and the TX49 series are using it
> as well.  Unfortunately there has been way to much creativity (usually
> a positive property but ...) among designers so this posting is an
> attempt to achieve completeness.
> 
>   Ralf

Exactly why we made it a standard in MIPS32 and MIPS64.
-- 

  =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
  Michael Uhler, VP, Systems, Architecture, and Software Products 
  MIPS Technologies, Inc.   Email: uhler@mips.com   Pager: uhler_p@mips.com
  1225 Charleston Road      Voice:  (650)567-5025   FAX:   (650)567-5225
  Mountain View, CA 94043   Mobile: (650)868-6870   Admin: (650)567-5085

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Mike Uhler" <uhler@mips.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Mike Uhler <uhler@mips.com>, Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.orguhler@mips.com
Subject: Re: way selection bit for multi-way cache
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:37:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200304101937.h3AJbl211418@uhler-linux.mips.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20030410193747.OUwDPCES7qdkhDN2H7HBDOxH83pgjvSmE6RgTIoXS8I@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:24:30 +0200." <20030410212430.A519@linux-mips.org>

> On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:50:53AM -0700, Mike Uhler wrote:
> 
> > I can't comment on anything but MIPS32 and MIPS64 CPUs, but the
> > MIPS32 and MIPS64 standard is to use the bits above the index field
> > to specify the way.  See the figure entitled "Usage of Address Fields
> > to Select Index and Way" in the CACHE instruction description of the
> > MIPS32 and MIPS64 Architecture for Programmer's manuals.
> 
> The question came up between Jun and me when revising the way of handling
> multi-way caches.  There is the MIPS32 / MIPS64 way of selecting the
> cache way - but that scheme was originally already introduced by the
> R4600.  The second somewhat less common scheme is using the lowest bits
> of the address.  That was originally introduced with the R10000 but a
> few other processors such as the R5432 and the TX49 series are using it
> as well.  Unfortunately there has been way to much creativity (usually
> a positive property but ...) among designers so this posting is an
> attempt to achieve completeness.
> 
>   Ralf

Exactly why we made it a standard in MIPS32 and MIPS64.
-- 

  =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
  Michael Uhler, VP, Systems, Architecture, and Software Products 
  MIPS Technologies, Inc.   Email: uhler@mips.com   Pager: uhler_p@mips.com
  1225 Charleston Road      Voice:  (650)567-5025   FAX:   (650)567-5225
  Mountain View, CA 94043   Mobile: (650)868-6870   Admin: (650)567-5085

  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-10 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-10 18:05 way selection bit for multi-way cache Jun Sun
2003-04-10 18:50 ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 18:55   ` Jun Sun
2003-04-10 19:24   ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-10 19:37     ` Mike Uhler [this message]
2003-04-10 19:37       ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 20:09       ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-10 20:28         ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 20:28           ` Mike Uhler
2003-04-10 20:52           ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-11  6:33             ` Dominic Sweetman
2003-04-11  8:15               ` Kevin D. Kissell
2003-04-11  8:15                 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2003-04-11 12:10                 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-04-11 11:35               ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200304101937.h3AJbl211418@uhler-linux.mips.com \
    --to=uhler@mips.com \
    --cc=jsun@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox