* to_tm() in kernel/time.c?
@ 2003-12-09 20:58 Brad Parker
2003-12-09 22:19 ` Jun Sun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Brad Parker @ 2003-12-09 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips
Can anyone tell me if to_tm() in kernel/time.c returns months as 0-11?
(in the current mips tree, that is)
I'm curious if the to_tm() in the ppc tree is the same as the to_tm()
in the mips tree. In the ppc tree it returns 1-12.
-brad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: to_tm() in kernel/time.c?
2003-12-09 20:58 to_tm() in kernel/time.c? Brad Parker
@ 2003-12-09 22:19 ` Jun Sun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jun Sun @ 2003-12-09 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brad Parker; +Cc: linux-mips, jsun
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:58:06PM -0500, Brad Parker wrote:
>
> Can anyone tell me if to_tm() in kernel/time.c returns months as 0-11?
> (in the current mips tree, that is)
>
It is 0-11. See the code
tm->tm_mon = i - 1; /* tm_mon starts from 0 to 11 */
> I'm curious if the to_tm() in the ppc tree is the same as the to_tm()
> in the mips tree. In the ppc tree it returns 1-12.
>
The routine was copied from PPC. I think tm_mon is set to 0-11 so as to match
struct rtc_time usage when it is exported to userland.
I will check with PPC folks to see why they changed it.
Jun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-09 22:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-09 20:58 to_tm() in kernel/time.c? Brad Parker
2003-12-09 22:19 ` Jun Sun
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox