From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk,
jsun@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.1/MIPS - missing cache flushing when user program returns pages to kernel
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:23:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040114222316.25276f12.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040114174012.H13471@mvista.com>
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:40:12 -0800
Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> wrote:
> Looking at my tree (which is from linux-mips.org), it appears
> arm, sparc, sparc64, and sh have tlb_start_vma() defined to call
> cache flushing.
Correct, in fact every platform where cache flushing matters
at all (ie. where flush_cache_*() routines actually need to
flush a cpu cache), they should have tlb_start_vma() do such
a flush.
> What exactly does tlb_start_vma()/tlb_end_vma() mean? There is
> only one invocation instance, which is significant enough to infer
> the meaning. :)
When the kernel unmaps a mmap region of a process (either for the
sake of munmap() or tearing down all mapping during exit()) tlb_start_vma()
is called, the page table mappings in the region are torn down one by
one, then a tlb_end_vma() call is made.
At the top level, ie. whoever invokes unmap_page_range(), there will
be a tlb_gather_mmu() call.
In order to properly optimize the cache flushes, most platforms do the
following:
1) The tlb->fullmm boolean keeps trap of whether this is just a munmap()
unmapping operation (if zero) or a full address space teardown
(if non-zero).
2) In the full address space teardown case, and thus tlb->fullmm is
non-zero, the top level will do the explict flush_cache_mm()
(see mm/mmap.c:exit_mmap()), therefore the tlb_start_vma()
implementation need not do the flush, otherwise it does.
This is why sparc64 and friends implement it like this:
#define tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma) \
do { if (!(tlb)->fullmm) \
flush_cache_range(vma, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end); \
} while (0)
Hope this clears things up.
Someone should probably take what I just wrote, expand and organize it,
then add such content to Documentation/cachetlb.txt
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.1/MIPS - missing cache flushing when user program returns pages to kernel
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:23:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040114222316.25276f12.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20040115062316.FH7cSn85mlm7YgYQiP6LoNf9hx27zf3Gj4aBjY8kZ74@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040114174012.H13471@mvista.com>
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:40:12 -0800
Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> wrote:
> Looking at my tree (which is from linux-mips.org), it appears
> arm, sparc, sparc64, and sh have tlb_start_vma() defined to call
> cache flushing.
Correct, in fact every platform where cache flushing matters
at all (ie. where flush_cache_*() routines actually need to
flush a cpu cache), they should have tlb_start_vma() do such
a flush.
> What exactly does tlb_start_vma()/tlb_end_vma() mean? There is
> only one invocation instance, which is significant enough to infer
> the meaning. :)
When the kernel unmaps a mmap region of a process (either for the
sake of munmap() or tearing down all mapping during exit()) tlb_start_vma()
is called, the page table mappings in the region are torn down one by
one, then a tlb_end_vma() call is made.
At the top level, ie. whoever invokes unmap_page_range(), there will
be a tlb_gather_mmu() call.
In order to properly optimize the cache flushes, most platforms do the
following:
1) The tlb->fullmm boolean keeps trap of whether this is just a munmap()
unmapping operation (if zero) or a full address space teardown
(if non-zero).
2) In the full address space teardown case, and thus tlb->fullmm is
non-zero, the top level will do the explict flush_cache_mm()
(see mm/mmap.c:exit_mmap()), therefore the tlb_start_vma()
implementation need not do the flush, otherwise it does.
This is why sparc64 and friends implement it like this:
#define tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma) \
do { if (!(tlb)->fullmm) \
flush_cache_range(vma, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end); \
} while (0)
Hope this clears things up.
Someone should probably take what I just wrote, expand and organize it,
then add such content to Documentation/cachetlb.txt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-15 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-15 0:39 [BUG] 2.6.1/MIPS - missing cache flushing when user program returns pages to kernel Jun Sun
2004-01-15 1:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-15 1:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-15 1:29 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-15 1:40 ` Jun Sun
2004-01-15 6:23 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-01-15 6:23 ` David S. Miller
2004-01-15 18:03 ` Jun Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040114222316.25276f12.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jsun@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox