From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Franck <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Optimize swab operations on mips_r2 cpu
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:04:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060125150404.GF3454@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cda58cb80601250632r3e8f7b9en@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 03:32:22PM +0100, Franck wrote:
> > We have CPU_MIPS32_R1, CPU_MIPS32_R2, CPU_MIPS64_R1, CPU_MIPS64_R2.
> > Based on those we also define CPU_MIPS32, CPU_MIPS64, CPU_MIPSR1,
> > and CPU_MIPSR2 as short cuts.
> >
>
> hm I should have missed something, but what about CPUs which have
> their own CPU_XXX (different form CPU_MIPS32_R[12]) and which are a
> mips32-r2 compliant for example ? (I'm thinking of 4KSD for example)
The 4KSD is still a MIPS32 processor - just one with an ASE.
The real bug here - and what's causing your confusion - is that the
processor configuration is mixing up all the architecture variants
(MIPS I - IV, MIPS32 and MIPS64 R1/R2, weirdo variants ...) and the
processor types. Example: 4K, 4KE, 24K, 24KE, 34K, AMD Alchemy are all
MIPS32 (either R1 or R2). R4000, R4400, R4600 are all MIPS III. But
what we actually offer in the processor configuration is R4X00, MIPS32_R1,
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-25 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-25 9:36 [RFC] Optimize swab operations on mips_r2 cpu Franck
2006-01-25 12:47 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-25 13:34 ` Franck
2006-01-25 14:11 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-25 14:14 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-25 14:32 ` Franck
2006-01-25 15:04 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2006-01-25 18:03 ` Franck
2006-01-25 18:15 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 8:11 ` Franck
2006-01-26 8:26 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 8:47 ` Franck
2006-01-26 9:17 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 9:17 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 11:56 ` Franck
2006-01-26 15:02 ` Franck
2006-01-26 15:23 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 15:23 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 15:29 ` Franck
2006-01-26 15:51 ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-26 16:31 ` Franck
2006-01-26 16:53 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 16:53 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 16:55 ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-26 18:02 ` Franck
2006-01-26 20:25 ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-27 9:03 ` Franck
2006-01-27 10:13 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 10:13 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 10:45 ` Franck
2006-01-27 11:31 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-27 12:53 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 12:53 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 14:44 ` Franck
2006-01-27 11:30 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-27 13:45 ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-27 14:54 ` Franck
2006-01-27 15:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-01-27 15:39 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 15:39 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 17:32 ` Franck
2006-01-29 15:07 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-30 13:08 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-01-30 14:31 ` Franck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060125150404.GF3454@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=kevink@mips.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=vagabon.xyz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox