Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nigel Stephens <nigel@mips.com>
To: Franck <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Optimize swab operations on mips_r2 cpu
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:55:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43D8FF16.40107@mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cda58cb80601260831i61167787g@mail.gmail.com>



Franck wrote:

>>-march=mips32r2 is to allow the compiler to generate branch-likely
>>instructions -- they're deprecated for generic mips32 code but carry no
>>penalty on the 4K core. It will also cause the compiler's "4kc" pipeline
>>description to be used for instruction scheduling, instead of the
>>default "24kc", but that should only change the order of instructions
>>    
>>
>
>Do you mean that the code can be run faster when using -march=4ksd ?
>  
>

Yes, though the difference is likely to be small. The -march=4ksd option 
also enables the SmartMIPS ASE, but you've already done that explicitly 
with -msmartmips.

>  
>
>>and shouldn't really make a significant difference to the code size.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>yes but I have :(
>  
>

Then you'll have to have a look at the resulting disassembled code and 
figure what's changed. :)

Thinking about this in more detail:

1) Using -march=4ksd reduces the cost of a multiply by 1 instruction 
(from 5 to 4 cycles), so a few more constant multiplications, previously 
expanded into a sequence of shifts, adds and subs, may now be replaced 
by a shorter sequence of "li" and "mul" instructions.

2) Enabling branch-likely may allow some instructions to be moved into a 
branch delay slot which previously couldn't be -- but usually these are 
duplicates of the code at the original branch target, so have little 
effect on overall code size.

3) Using -march=mips32r2 with -O1 and above (but not -Os) enables 64-bit 
alignment of functions and frequently-used branch targets (e.g. loop 
headers); whereas -march=4ksc will not do that. This will add some 
additional "nops" to the code.

Nigel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-26 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-25  9:36 [RFC] Optimize swab operations on mips_r2 cpu Franck
2006-01-25 12:47 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-25 13:34   ` Franck
2006-01-25 14:11     ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-25 14:14       ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-25 14:32         ` Franck
2006-01-25 15:04           ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-25 18:03             ` Franck
2006-01-25 18:15               ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26  8:11                 ` Franck
2006-01-26  8:26                   ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26  8:47                     ` Franck
2006-01-26  9:17                       ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26  9:17                         ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 11:56                         ` Franck
2006-01-26 15:02                 ` Franck
2006-01-26 15:23                   ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 15:23                     ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 15:29                     ` Franck
2006-01-26 15:51                     ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-26 16:31                       ` Franck
2006-01-26 16:53                         ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 16:53                           ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-26 16:55                         ` Nigel Stephens [this message]
2006-01-26 18:02                           ` Franck
2006-01-26 20:25                             ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-27  9:03                               ` Franck
2006-01-27 10:13                                 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 10:13                                   ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 10:45                                   ` Franck
2006-01-27 11:31                                     ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-27 12:53                                     ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 12:53                                       ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 14:44                                       ` Franck
2006-01-27 11:30                                   ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-27 13:45                                 ` Nigel Stephens
2006-01-27 14:54                                   ` Franck
2006-01-27 15:04                                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-01-27 15:39                                     ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 15:39                                       ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-01-27 17:32                                       ` Franck
2006-01-29 15:07                                         ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-30 13:08                                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-01-30 14:31                                           ` Franck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43D8FF16.40107@mips.com \
    --to=nigel@mips.com \
    --cc=kevink@mips.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=vagabon.xyz@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox