* [PATCH] oprofile cleanups
@ 2006-02-16 14:45 Atsushi Nemoto
2006-03-24 4:18 ` Atsushi Nemoto
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Atsushi Nemoto @ 2006-02-16 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips; +Cc: ralf
1. Use CONFIG_OPROFILE to get rid of overhead for null_perf_irq() call.
2. Call perf_irq from timer_interrupt instead of ll_timer_interrupt.
Most (non-SMP) boards will use timer_interrupt (instead of
ll_timer_interrupt), so it would be better to move calling of
perf_irq() to timer_interrupt().
3. Use jiffies instead of local timer_tick_count.
I can not test it by myself for now while I do not have any
MIPS32/MIPS64 board.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/time.c b/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
index 7050b4f..7b5c5b9 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
@@ -414,6 +414,18 @@ void local_timer_interrupt(int irq, void
update_process_times(user_mode(regs));
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE) || defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE_MODULE)
+int null_perf_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int (*perf_irq)(struct pt_regs *regs) = null_perf_irq;
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(null_perf_irq);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(perf_irq);
+#endif
+
/*
* High-level timer interrupt service routines. This function
* is set as irqaction->handler and is invoked through do_IRQ.
@@ -422,6 +434,22 @@ irqreturn_t timer_interrupt(int irq, voi
{
unsigned long j;
unsigned int count;
+#if defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE) || defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE_MODULE)
+ int r2 = cpu_has_mips_r2;
+
+ /*
+ * Suckage alert:
+ * Before R2 of the architecture there was no way to see if a
+ * performance counter interrupt was pending, so we have to run the
+ * performance counter interrupt handler anyway.
+ */
+ if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 26)))
+ if (perf_irq(regs))
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+
+ if (r2 && !(read_c0_cause() & (1 << 30)))
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+#endif
count = mips_hpt_read();
mips_timer_ack();
@@ -507,38 +535,14 @@ irqreturn_t timer_interrupt(int irq, voi
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-int null_perf_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-int (*perf_irq)(struct pt_regs *regs) = null_perf_irq;
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(null_perf_irq);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(perf_irq);
-
asmlinkage void ll_timer_interrupt(int irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- int r2 = cpu_has_mips_r2;
-
irq_enter();
kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq]++;
- /*
- * Suckage alert:
- * Before R2 of the architecture there was no way to see if a
- * performance counter interrupt was pending, so we have to run the
- * performance counter interrupt handler anyway.
- */
- if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 26)))
- if (perf_irq(regs))
- goto out;
-
/* we keep interrupt disabled all the time */
- if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 30)))
- timer_interrupt(irq, NULL, regs);
+ timer_interrupt(irq, NULL, regs);
-out:
irq_exit();
}
diff --git a/arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/time.c b/arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/time.c
index 93f3bf2..f9471de 100644
--- a/arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/time.c
+++ b/arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/time.c
@@ -58,12 +58,11 @@ static char display_string[] = "
static unsigned int display_count = 0;
#define MAX_DISPLAY_COUNT (sizeof(display_string) - 8)
-static unsigned int timer_tick_count=0;
static int mips_cpu_timer_irq;
static inline void scroll_display_message(void)
{
- if ((timer_tick_count++ % HZ) == 0) {
+ if ((jiffies % HZ) == 0) {
mips_display_message(&display_string[display_count++]);
if (display_count == MAX_DISPLAY_COUNT)
display_count = 0;
@@ -75,13 +74,8 @@ static void mips_timer_dispatch (struct
do_IRQ (mips_cpu_timer_irq, regs);
}
-extern int null_perf_irq(struct pt_regs *regs);
-
-extern int (*perf_irq)(struct pt_regs *regs);
-
irqreturn_t mips_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- int r2 = cpu_has_mips_r2;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (cpu == 0) {
@@ -90,13 +84,7 @@ irqreturn_t mips_timer_interrupt(int irq
* accounting resets count/compare registers to trigger next
* timer int.
*/
- if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 26)))
- if (perf_irq(regs))
- goto out;
-
- /* we keep interrupt disabled all the time */
- if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 30)))
- timer_interrupt(irq, NULL, regs);
+ timer_interrupt(irq, NULL, regs);
scroll_display_message();
} else {
@@ -114,7 +102,6 @@ irqreturn_t mips_timer_interrupt(int irq
local_timer_interrupt (irq, dev_id, regs);
}
-out:
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] oprofile cleanups
2006-02-16 14:45 [PATCH] oprofile cleanups Atsushi Nemoto
@ 2006-03-24 4:18 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-03-24 7:07 ` compilartion error : label at end of compound statement Gowri Satish Adimulam
2006-04-25 15:01 ` [PATCH] oprofile cleanups Atsushi Nemoto
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Atsushi Nemoto @ 2006-03-24 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips; +Cc: ralf
Revised for current git tree.
1. Use CONFIG_OPROFILE to get rid of overhead for null_perf_irq() call.
2. Call perf_irq from timer_interrupt() instead of
ll_timer_interrupt(). Many boards are using timer_interrupt(), so
it would be better to call perf_irq() here.
3. Use jiffies instead of timer_tick_count in scroll_display_message().
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/time.c b/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
index 51273b7..43b4845 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
@@ -415,6 +415,18 @@ void local_timer_interrupt(int irq, void
update_process_times(user_mode(regs));
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE) || defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE_MODULE)
+int null_perf_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int (*perf_irq)(struct pt_regs *regs) = null_perf_irq;
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(null_perf_irq);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(perf_irq);
+#endif
+
/*
* High-level timer interrupt service routines. This function
* is set as irqaction->handler and is invoked through do_IRQ.
@@ -423,6 +435,22 @@ irqreturn_t timer_interrupt(int irq, voi
{
unsigned long j;
unsigned int count;
+#if defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE) || defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE_MODULE)
+ int r2 = cpu_has_mips_r2;
+
+ /*
+ * Suckage alert:
+ * Before R2 of the architecture there was no way to see if a
+ * performance counter interrupt was pending, so we have to run the
+ * performance counter interrupt handler anyway.
+ */
+ if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 26)))
+ if (perf_irq(regs))
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+
+ if (r2 && !(read_c0_cause() & (1 << 30)))
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+#endif
write_seqlock(&xtime_lock);
@@ -510,38 +538,14 @@ irqreturn_t timer_interrupt(int irq, voi
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-int null_perf_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-int (*perf_irq)(struct pt_regs *regs) = null_perf_irq;
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(null_perf_irq);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(perf_irq);
-
asmlinkage void ll_timer_interrupt(int irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- int r2 = cpu_has_mips_r2;
-
irq_enter();
kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq]++;
- /*
- * Suckage alert:
- * Before R2 of the architecture there was no way to see if a
- * performance counter interrupt was pending, so we have to run the
- * performance counter interrupt handler anyway.
- */
- if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 26)))
- if (perf_irq(regs))
- goto out;
-
/* we keep interrupt disabled all the time */
- if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 30)))
- timer_interrupt(irq, NULL, regs);
+ timer_interrupt(irq, NULL, regs);
-out:
irq_exit();
}
diff --git a/arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/time.c b/arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/time.c
index 93f3bf2..f9471de 100644
--- a/arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/time.c
+++ b/arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/time.c
@@ -58,12 +58,11 @@ static char display_string[] = "
static unsigned int display_count = 0;
#define MAX_DISPLAY_COUNT (sizeof(display_string) - 8)
-static unsigned int timer_tick_count=0;
static int mips_cpu_timer_irq;
static inline void scroll_display_message(void)
{
- if ((timer_tick_count++ % HZ) == 0) {
+ if ((jiffies % HZ) == 0) {
mips_display_message(&display_string[display_count++]);
if (display_count == MAX_DISPLAY_COUNT)
display_count = 0;
@@ -75,13 +74,8 @@ static void mips_timer_dispatch (struct
do_IRQ (mips_cpu_timer_irq, regs);
}
-extern int null_perf_irq(struct pt_regs *regs);
-
-extern int (*perf_irq)(struct pt_regs *regs);
-
irqreturn_t mips_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- int r2 = cpu_has_mips_r2;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (cpu == 0) {
@@ -90,13 +84,7 @@ irqreturn_t mips_timer_interrupt(int irq
* accounting resets count/compare registers to trigger next
* timer int.
*/
- if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 26)))
- if (perf_irq(regs))
- goto out;
-
- /* we keep interrupt disabled all the time */
- if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 30)))
- timer_interrupt(irq, NULL, regs);
+ timer_interrupt(irq, NULL, regs);
scroll_display_message();
} else {
@@ -114,7 +102,6 @@ irqreturn_t mips_timer_interrupt(int irq
local_timer_interrupt (irq, dev_id, regs);
}
-out:
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* compilartion error : label at end of compound statement
2006-03-24 4:18 ` Atsushi Nemoto
@ 2006-03-24 7:07 ` Gowri Satish Adimulam
2006-03-24 8:18 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-03-24 11:12 ` Thiemo Seufer
2006-04-25 15:01 ` [PATCH] oprofile cleanups Atsushi Nemoto
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gowri Satish Adimulam @ 2006-03-24 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips
Hi ,
Iam trying to compile simple application with mips cross compiler ,
Iam getting the below error ,
i tried to google but unable to find relavent solution
any pointers will be helpful ,
===============error==========
mipsel-linux-uclibc-gcc -Wall -c -o ls.o ls.c
ls.c: In function `donlist':
ls.c:591: error: label at end of compound statement
==============end of error============
Thanks
Gowri
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: compilartion error : label at end of compound statement
2006-03-24 7:07 ` compilartion error : label at end of compound statement Gowri Satish Adimulam
@ 2006-03-24 8:18 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-03-27 1:15 ` Gowri Satish Adimulam
2006-03-24 11:12 ` Thiemo Seufer
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2006-03-24 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gowri Satish Adimulam; +Cc: linux-mips
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 04:07:52PM +0900, Gowri Satish Adimulam wrote:
> Hi ,
> Iam trying to compile simple application with mips cross compiler ,
You didn't say which one.
(Fortunately it's obvious enough in this case)
> Iam getting the below error ,
> i tried to google but unable to find relavent solution
>
> any pointers will be helpful ,
>
> ===============error==========
>
> mipsel-linux-uclibc-gcc -Wall -c -o ls.o ls.c
> ls.c: In function `donlist':
> ls.c:591: error: label at end of compound statement
Something like:
switch (x) {
case 3:
}
will result in this error message in C9x. Solution: insert a semicolon
like:
switch (x) {
case 3:
;
}
The reason is that the C stanadard requires - and thus gcc since 3.4 (?) -
a label to be followed by a statement and a semicolon alone is already
an statement.
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: compilartion error : label at end of compound statement
2006-03-24 7:07 ` compilartion error : label at end of compound statement Gowri Satish Adimulam
2006-03-24 8:18 ` Ralf Baechle
@ 2006-03-24 11:12 ` Thiemo Seufer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thiemo Seufer @ 2006-03-24 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gowri Satish Adimulam; +Cc: linux-mips
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 04:07:52PM +0900, Gowri Satish Adimulam wrote:
> Hi ,
> Iam trying to compile simple application with mips cross compiler ,
> Iam getting the below error ,
> i tried to google but unable to find relavent solution
>
> any pointers will be helpful ,
>
> ===============error==========
>
> mipsel-linux-uclibc-gcc -Wall -c -o ls.o ls.c
> ls.c: In function `donlist':
> ls.c:591: error: label at end of compound statement
>
> ==============end of error============
The compiler got pickier about such empty statements some years
ago, you'll have to update your source from .e.g.
switch (.....) {
case 1:
.....
break;
default:
}
to
switch (.....) {
case 1:
.....
break;
default:
break;
}
Thiemo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: compilartion error : label at end of compound statement
2006-03-24 8:18 ` Ralf Baechle
@ 2006-03-27 1:15 ` Gowri Satish Adimulam
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gowri Satish Adimulam @ 2006-03-27 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips
Thanks every body
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 08:18 +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 04:07:52PM +0900, Gowri Satish Adimulam wrote:
>
> > Hi ,
> > Iam trying to compile simple application with mips cross compiler ,
>
> You didn't say which one.
>
> (Fortunately it's obvious enough in this case)
>
> > Iam getting the below error ,
> > i tried to google but unable to find relavent solution
> >
> > any pointers will be helpful ,
> >
> > ===============error==========
> >
> > mipsel-linux-uclibc-gcc -Wall -c -o ls.o ls.c
> > ls.c: In function `donlist':
> > ls.c:591: error: label at end of compound statement
>
> Something like:
>
> switch (x) {
> case 3:
> }
>
> will result in this error message in C9x. Solution: insert a semicolon
> like:
>
> switch (x) {
> case 3:
> ;
> }
>
> The reason is that the C stanadard requires - and thus gcc since 3.4 (?) -
> a label to be followed by a statement and a semicolon alone is already
> an statement.
>
> Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] oprofile cleanups
2006-03-24 4:18 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-03-24 7:07 ` compilartion error : label at end of compound statement Gowri Satish Adimulam
@ 2006-04-25 15:01 ` Atsushi Nemoto
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Atsushi Nemoto @ 2006-04-25 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips; +Cc: ralf
Revised for current git tree.
1. Use CONFIG_OPROFILE to get rid of overhead for null_perf_irq() call.
2. Call perf_irq from timer_interrupt() instead of
ll_timer_interrupt(). Many boards are using timer_interrupt(), so
it would be better to call perf_irq() here.
3. Use jiffies instead of timer_tick_count in scroll_display_message().
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/time.c b/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
index 13ff4da..f470ec5 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/time.c
@@ -414,6 +414,18 @@ void local_timer_interrupt(int irq, void
update_process_times(user_mode(regs));
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE) || defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE_MODULE)
+int null_perf_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int (*perf_irq)(struct pt_regs *regs) = null_perf_irq;
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(null_perf_irq);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(perf_irq);
+#endif
+
/*
* High-level timer interrupt service routines. This function
* is set as irqaction->handler and is invoked through do_IRQ.
@@ -422,6 +434,22 @@ irqreturn_t timer_interrupt(int irq, voi
{
unsigned long j;
unsigned int count;
+#if defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE) || defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE_MODULE)
+ int r2 = cpu_has_mips_r2;
+
+ /*
+ * Suckage alert:
+ * Before R2 of the architecture there was no way to see if a
+ * performance counter interrupt was pending, so we have to run the
+ * performance counter interrupt handler anyway.
+ */
+ if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 26)))
+ if (perf_irq(regs))
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+
+ if (r2 && !(read_c0_cause() & (1 << 30)))
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+#endif
write_seqlock(&xtime_lock);
@@ -509,38 +537,14 @@ irqreturn_t timer_interrupt(int irq, voi
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-int null_perf_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-int (*perf_irq)(struct pt_regs *regs) = null_perf_irq;
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(null_perf_irq);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(perf_irq);
-
asmlinkage void ll_timer_interrupt(int irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- int r2 = cpu_has_mips_r2;
-
irq_enter();
kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq]++;
- /*
- * Suckage alert:
- * Before R2 of the architecture there was no way to see if a
- * performance counter interrupt was pending, so we have to run the
- * performance counter interrupt handler anyway.
- */
- if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 26)))
- if (perf_irq(regs))
- goto out;
-
/* we keep interrupt disabled all the time */
- if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 30)))
- timer_interrupt(irq, NULL, regs);
+ timer_interrupt(irq, NULL, regs);
-out:
irq_exit();
}
diff --git a/arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/time.c b/arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/time.c
index a9f6124..4eb9b96 100644
--- a/arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/time.c
+++ b/arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/time.c
@@ -65,13 +65,12 @@ static unsigned int display_count;
#define CPUCTR_IMASKBIT (0x100 << MIPSCPU_INT_CPUCTR)
-static unsigned int timer_tick_count;
static int mips_cpu_timer_irq;
extern void smtc_timer_broadcast(int);
static inline void scroll_display_message(void)
{
- if ((timer_tick_count++ % HZ) == 0) {
+ if ((jiffies % HZ) == 0) {
mips_display_message(&display_string[display_count++]);
if (display_count == MAX_DISPLAY_COUNT)
display_count = 0;
@@ -83,17 +82,9 @@ static void mips_timer_dispatch (struct
do_IRQ (mips_cpu_timer_irq, regs);
}
-/*
- * Redeclare until I get around mopping the timer code insanity on MIPS.
- */
-extern int null_perf_irq(struct pt_regs *regs);
-
-extern int (*perf_irq)(struct pt_regs *regs);
-
irqreturn_t mips_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- int r2 = cpu_has_mips_r2;
#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMTC
/*
@@ -138,13 +129,7 @@ irqreturn_t mips_timer_interrupt(int irq
* accounting resets count/compare registers to trigger next
* timer int.
*/
- if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 26)))
- if (perf_irq(regs))
- goto out;
-
- /* we keep interrupt disabled all the time */
- if (!r2 || (read_c0_cause() & (1 << 30)))
- timer_interrupt(irq, NULL, regs);
+ timer_interrupt(irq, NULL, regs);
scroll_display_message();
} else {
@@ -164,7 +149,6 @@ irqreturn_t mips_timer_interrupt(int irq
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMTC */
-out:
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-25 14:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-16 14:45 [PATCH] oprofile cleanups Atsushi Nemoto
2006-03-24 4:18 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-03-24 7:07 ` compilartion error : label at end of compound statement Gowri Satish Adimulam
2006-03-24 8:18 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-03-27 1:15 ` Gowri Satish Adimulam
2006-03-24 11:12 ` Thiemo Seufer
2006-04-25 15:01 ` [PATCH] oprofile cleanups Atsushi Nemoto
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox