* 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k
@ 2006-09-22 15:06 Samium Gromoff
2006-09-22 16:40 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-09-27 20:06 ` Peter Watkins
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Samium Gromoff @ 2006-09-22 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips
How reliable is 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k-likes in kernels around 2.6.17?
Is it known to work?
regards, Samium Gromoff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k
2006-09-22 15:06 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k Samium Gromoff
@ 2006-09-22 16:40 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-09-22 16:44 ` Samium Gromoff
2006-09-27 20:06 ` Peter Watkins
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2006-09-22 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Samium Gromoff; +Cc: linux-mips
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:06:30PM +0400, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> How reliable is 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k-likes in kernels around 2.6.17?
>
> Is it known to work?
it's certainly not as well tested as 4k pages but several people have
reported success, most recently also on 32-bit kernels.
Btw, r4k is a bit ambigous, did you mean R4000 or 4K?
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k
2006-09-22 16:40 ` Ralf Baechle
@ 2006-09-22 16:44 ` Samium Gromoff
2006-09-22 16:53 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Samium Gromoff @ 2006-09-22 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ralf Baechle; +Cc: Linux MIPS
Ralf Baechle wrote:
>it's certainly not as well tested as 4k pages but several people have
>reported success, most recently also on 32-bit kernels.
>
>Btw, r4k is a bit ambigous, did you mean R4000 or 4K?
>
>
mostly R4000-like MIPS32en, actually
> Ralf
>
>
regards, Samium Gromoff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k
2006-09-22 16:44 ` Samium Gromoff
@ 2006-09-22 16:53 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2006-09-22 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Samium Gromoff; +Cc: Linux MIPS
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 08:44:34PM +0400, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> >it's certainly not as well tested as 4k pages but several people have
> >reported success, most recently also on 32-bit kernels.
> >
> >Btw, r4k is a bit ambigous, did you mean R4000 or 4K?
> >
> >
> mostly R4000-like MIPS32en, actually
R4000 is 64-bit bit so they're not that similar ...
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k
2006-09-22 15:06 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k Samium Gromoff
2006-09-22 16:40 ` Ralf Baechle
@ 2006-09-27 20:06 ` Peter Watkins
2006-10-04 12:35 ` Samium Gromoff
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Watkins @ 2006-09-27 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Samium Gromoff; +Cc: linux-mips
Samium Gromoff wrote:
> How reliable is 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k-likes in kernels around 2.6.17?
>
> Is it known to work?
>
> regards, Samium Gromoff
>
>
You might want to look at:
http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2006-08/msg00294.html
http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2006-08/msg00244.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-04 12:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-22 15:06 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k Samium Gromoff
2006-09-22 16:40 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-09-22 16:44 ` Samium Gromoff
2006-09-22 16:53 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-09-27 20:06 ` Peter Watkins
2006-10-04 12:35 ` Samium Gromoff
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox