Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Silicon Motion framebuffer
@ 2007-07-23 15:58 Ralf Baechle
  2007-07-23 16:05 ` Manuel Lauss
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2007-07-23 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mips

So there is this SM501 Voyager sitting in the lmo tree for ages.  So the
usual question, is anybody still using / interested in this driver?  Or
possibly even interested in taking over maintainership for the thing and
pushing it upstream?

  Ralf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Silicon Motion framebuffer
  2007-07-23 15:58 Silicon Motion framebuffer Ralf Baechle
@ 2007-07-23 16:05 ` Manuel Lauss
  2007-07-23 18:09   ` Ralf Baechle
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Manuel Lauss @ 2007-07-23 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ralf Baechle; +Cc: linux-mips

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:58:14PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> So there is this SM501 Voyager sitting in the lmo tree for ages.  So the
> usual question, is anybody still using / interested in this driver?  Or
> possibly even interested in taking over maintainership for the thing and
> pushing it upstream?

There's already a well-working SM501 MFD and framebuffer driver in upstream
since about 2.6.21.  I'd say get rid of the mips version and encourage
people to test the new driver.

Thanks,
	Manuel Lauss

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Silicon Motion framebuffer
  2007-07-23 16:05 ` Manuel Lauss
@ 2007-07-23 18:09   ` Ralf Baechle
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2007-07-23 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manuel Lauss; +Cc: linux-mips

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 06:05:55PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:58:14PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > So there is this SM501 Voyager sitting in the lmo tree for ages.  So the
> > usual question, is anybody still using / interested in this driver?  Or
> > possibly even interested in taking over maintainership for the thing and
> > pushing it upstream?
> 
> There's already a well-working SM501 MFD and framebuffer driver in upstream
> since about 2.6.21.  I'd say get rid of the mips version and encourage
> people to test the new driver.

So I removed it.

  Ralf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-23 18:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-23 15:58 Silicon Motion framebuffer Ralf Baechle
2007-07-23 16:05 ` Manuel Lauss
2007-07-23 18:09   ` Ralf Baechle

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox