Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: plat_timer_setup, mips_timer_ack, etc.
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:36:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071016163610.GA25794@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071017.005211.108739735.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:52:11AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

> With recent clockevent conversion, for typical r4k counter timer,
> setup_irq() for the timer interrupt is called three times.
> 
> 1. from time_init()  (#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_CPU block)
> 2. from plat_timer_setup()  (arch/tx4927/common/tx4927_setup.c, for example)
> 3. from mips_clockevent_init()
> 
> Which one should remain?

I would suggest the one near where the clockevent device is registered.

> Also I found mips_timer_ack and cycles_per_jiffy are not used now.
> Can we remove them entirely?

I think so.  Each clockevent device should rather try to be independent
of others.  What made the old timer code such a mess is that it was
desparately trying to share resources giving everybody plenty of rope ...


> Furthermore, I wonder how to disable mips_clockevent_device even if
> the CPU has r4k counter.  For example, pnx8550 has the r4k counter but
> needs special mips_timer_ack and clocksource_mips.read routine.  I
> suppose current time code is broken for such platforms.

PNX and the old revisions of the R4000 which have a bug where the
compare interrupt can be lost if the counter is read just when it has
the same value as the compare register.

  Ralf

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-16 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-16 15:52 plat_timer_setup, mips_timer_ack, etc Atsushi Nemoto
2007-10-16 16:36 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2007-10-16 17:01   ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-10-17 16:28     ` Ralf Baechle
2007-10-17 16:34       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-10-17 16:58         ` Ralf Baechle
2007-10-17 17:40         ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071016163610.GA25794@linux-mips.org \
    --to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox