From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Kumba <kumba@gentoo.org>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
Linux MIPS List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
rdsandiford@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: R10000 Needs LL/SC Workaround in Gcc
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:04:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081104090410.GC7291@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <490FF63A.7010900@gentoo.org>
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:14:02AM -0500, Kumba wrote:
>> Agreed, but that's just as true of option 1. Each option is as correct
>> as the other. It's just a question of whether we need the combination:
>>
>> -mips1 -mllsc -mfix-r10000
>>
>> to be accepted, or whether we can treat it as a compile-time error.
>
> Hmm, which do you think makes sense? From a usage perspective, most
It's a crude way of asking for a generic MIPS binary that runs on anything
but works best on MIPS II+.
Makes me wonder if there is a point in having a single gcc option, something
like -march=generic which selects something like this, including all
workarounds?
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-04 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-31 5:00 [PATCH]: R10000 Needs LL/SC Workaround in Gcc Kumba
2008-10-31 14:24 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-01 7:30 ` Kumba
2008-11-01 17:41 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-01 18:49 ` Kumba
2008-11-01 19:42 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-02 0:00 ` Kumba
2008-11-02 10:00 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-03 9:01 ` Kumba
2008-11-03 20:47 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-04 0:04 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-11-04 7:14 ` Kumba
2008-11-04 9:04 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2008-11-04 14:26 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-04 14:31 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-11-04 14:23 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-08 9:37 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-08 18:20 ` Markus Gothe
2008-11-10 6:09 ` Kumba
2008-11-11 23:13 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-11 23:28 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-11 23:40 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-12 7:42 ` Kumba
2008-11-13 23:10 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-14 8:14 ` Kumba
2008-11-15 14:28 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-16 7:35 ` Kumba
2008-11-02 10:49 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-02 11:34 ` Richard Sandiford
2008-11-03 16:51 ` Paul_Koning
2008-11-03 16:51 ` Paul_Koning
2008-11-03 16:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-03 17:35 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-11-01 20:33 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-01 23:45 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081104090410.GC7291@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kumba@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rdsandiford@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox