* Kill kspd?
@ 2012-10-09 17:45 Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2012-10-09 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips; +Cc: Chris Dearman, Steven J. Hill, John Crispin
Kspd is executing syscalls from inside kernel space, something that is
fraud with all sorts of problems as identified by Al and anyway, executing
syscalls from kernel space has been something that's been frowned upon
if not deprecated for a long time. Al may want to elaborate on the issues
but suffice to say it's not pretty.
So I'm wondering, is anybody still using kspd? Much of kspd's knowledge
of the ABI on the client processor (which might not even be based on SDE!)
should vanish along with the use of syscalls. If somebody wants to
reengineer kspd I think I'd favor a userspace daemon that just uses a
small kernel communication facility (think of a pipe or socket) for
communication unless somebody finds a good argument (performance?) against
that. Or and I'd be perfectly fine with that, we could just nuke the
bloody thing. I receive no feedback on it which makes me assume that
nobody's using it so I'm all in favor for the nuclear solution.
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-10-09 17:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-09 17:45 Kill kspd? Ralf Baechle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox