Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Tell R4k SC and MC variations apart
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:02:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130925110231.GM31185@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1309250019490.17450@linux-mips.org>

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:37:42AM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

> > My reservations may have been about userland reading /proc/cpuinfo and
> > looking at the CPU type.  Some software may know how to handle the
> > PC/SC variants but not the MC versions.  But this seems to be a fairly
> > weak concern - and I trust you checked gcc's parsing of /proc/cpuinfo.
> 
>  Actually I wasn't actually aware GCC's got /proc/cpuinfo-based native 
> arch support for the MIPS target these days, thanks for the hint.
> 
>  I have now checked the relevant source file and support is pretty weak 
> there, only half a dozen processors are recognised and no R4k model is 
> among them.  In any case strstr is used to check for matches there so I'd 
> expect strings like "R4000" or "R4400" without a further suffix to be 
> chosen.

It'd be worth a change in particular for users how higher end CPUs and
enhanced ISAs such as Octeons.

Or should we just default to O32 w/ MIPS I + LL/SC as the MIPS Esperanto
forever ...

  Ralf

      reply	other threads:[~2013-09-25 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-22 22:30 [PATCH] MIPS: Tell R4k SC and MC variations apart Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-09-23 11:37 ` Jonas Gorski
2013-09-23 12:35   ` [PATCH v2] " Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-09-23 12:41     ` Jonas Gorski
2013-09-23 13:01       ` [PATCH v3] " Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-09-24  9:11         ` Ralf Baechle
2013-09-24  8:48 ` [PATCH] " Ralf Baechle
2013-09-24 23:37   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-09-25 11:02     ` Ralf Baechle [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130925110231.GM31185@linux-mips.org \
    --to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox