Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com>
Cc: <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com>,
	Alex Smith <alex@alex-smith.me.uk>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: VDSO: Fix binutils version test
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:22:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160106152201.GC17861@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160105151705-tung7970@googlemail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1910 bytes --]

Hi Tony,

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 03:21:01PM +0800, Tony Wu wrote:
> Commit 2a037f310bab ("MIPS: VDSO: Fix build error") fixed the logic
> for testing binutils version, but introduced another issue.
> 
> The ld-ifversion macro is defined as follows:
> 
>   $(shell [ $(ld-version) $(1) $(2) ] && echo $(3) || echo $(4))
> 
> This macro checks ld version to echo $(3) or echo $(4) based on
> the given condition.
> 
> It is called as follows in arch/mips/vdso/Makefile:
> 
>   ifeq ($(call ld-ifversion, -lt, 22500000, y),)
>     $(warning MIPS VDSO requires binutils >= 2.25)
>     obj-vdso-y := $(filter-out gettimeofday.o, $(obj-vdso-y))
>     ccflags-vdso += -DDISABLE_MIPS_VDSO
>   endif
> 
> Since $(4) is empty, echo $(4) will evaluate to a simple 'echo'. So, in
> case binutils version is indeed greater than 2.25.0, ld-ifversion macro
> will return a newline, not the empty string as expected, and that makes
> the test fail.
> 
> This patch fixes the test condition.

See:
- http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/11926/
  (now merged into mainline)
- http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/11931/
  (in mips-for-linux-next / linux-next for v4.4)

Thanks
James
  
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com>
> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com>
> Cc: Alex Smith <alex@alex-smith.me.uk>
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/vdso/Makefile b/arch/mips/vdso/Makefile
> index 018f8c7..a54a082 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/vdso/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/mips/vdso/Makefile
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ aflags-vdso := $(ccflags-vdso) \
>  # the comments on that file.
>  #
>  ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6
> -  ifeq ($(call ld-ifversion, -lt, 22500000, y),)
> +  ifneq ($(call ld-ifversion,-ge,22500000,y),y)
>      $(warning MIPS VDSO requires binutils >= 2.25)
>      obj-vdso-y := $(filter-out gettimeofday.o, $(obj-vdso-y))
>      ccflags-vdso += -DDISABLE_MIPS_VDSO
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com>
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com>,
	Alex Smith <alex@alex-smith.me.uk>,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: VDSO: Fix binutils version test
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:22:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160106152201.GC17861@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20160106152201.1hs20oBExUJfxsiD0LsxeDKYT67WthlZeTSdnJsuZRg@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160105151705-tung7970@googlemail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1910 bytes --]

Hi Tony,

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 03:21:01PM +0800, Tony Wu wrote:
> Commit 2a037f310bab ("MIPS: VDSO: Fix build error") fixed the logic
> for testing binutils version, but introduced another issue.
> 
> The ld-ifversion macro is defined as follows:
> 
>   $(shell [ $(ld-version) $(1) $(2) ] && echo $(3) || echo $(4))
> 
> This macro checks ld version to echo $(3) or echo $(4) based on
> the given condition.
> 
> It is called as follows in arch/mips/vdso/Makefile:
> 
>   ifeq ($(call ld-ifversion, -lt, 22500000, y),)
>     $(warning MIPS VDSO requires binutils >= 2.25)
>     obj-vdso-y := $(filter-out gettimeofday.o, $(obj-vdso-y))
>     ccflags-vdso += -DDISABLE_MIPS_VDSO
>   endif
> 
> Since $(4) is empty, echo $(4) will evaluate to a simple 'echo'. So, in
> case binutils version is indeed greater than 2.25.0, ld-ifversion macro
> will return a newline, not the empty string as expected, and that makes
> the test fail.
> 
> This patch fixes the test condition.

See:
- http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/11926/
  (now merged into mainline)
- http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/11931/
  (in mips-for-linux-next / linux-next for v4.4)

Thanks
James
  
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com>
> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com>
> Cc: Alex Smith <alex@alex-smith.me.uk>
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/vdso/Makefile b/arch/mips/vdso/Makefile
> index 018f8c7..a54a082 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/vdso/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/mips/vdso/Makefile
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ aflags-vdso := $(ccflags-vdso) \
>  # the comments on that file.
>  #
>  ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6
> -  ifeq ($(call ld-ifversion, -lt, 22500000, y),)
> +  ifneq ($(call ld-ifversion,-ge,22500000,y),y)
>      $(warning MIPS VDSO requires binutils >= 2.25)
>      obj-vdso-y := $(filter-out gettimeofday.o, $(obj-vdso-y))
>      ccflags-vdso += -DDISABLE_MIPS_VDSO
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-06 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-05  7:21 [PATCH] MIPS: VDSO: Fix binutils version test Tony Wu
2016-01-06 15:22 ` James Hogan [this message]
2016-01-06 15:22   ` James Hogan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160106152201.GC17861@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org \
    --to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=alex@alex-smith.me.uk \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@imgtec.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=tung7970@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox