From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: <jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<rkrcmar@redhat.com>, <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/13] KVM: MIPS: Pass type of fault down to kvm_mips_map_page()
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:27:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117132749.GA11733@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201701171906397244491@zte.com.cn>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3196 bytes --]
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 07:06:39PM +0800, jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn wrote:
> > kvm_mips_map_page() will need to know whether the fault was due to a
> > read or a write in order to support dirty page tracking,
> > KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU, and read only memory regions, so get that information
> > passed down to it via new bool write_fault arguments to various
> > functions.
>
> Hi, James,
>
>
> Maybe it's not good idea to add an argument and pass it down to various functions, it will ,
>
> make the the interface more complicated, have more possibolity, and more difficult to test.
>
kvm_mips_map_page() needs to know is whether it is being triggered in
response to a write, but it is abstracted and independent from what host
exception triggered it. It is only really concerned with the GPA space.
>
>
>
> As far as I can see, what you need is to let kvm_mips_map_page() know the *reason*.
>
> would it be better to let kvm_mips_map_page() get *exccode* from the CP0 directly, or
>
>
> provide any interface to get the fault reason?
I presume you mean from the saved host cause register in the VCPU
context (since intervening exceptions/interrupts will clobber the actual
CP0 Cause register).
It directly needs to know whether it can get away with a read-only
mapping, and although it directly depends on a GVA segment, it doesn't
necessarily relate to a memory access made by the guest.
kvm_mips_map_page() is called via:
- kvm_mips_handle_kseg0_tlb_fault()
for faults in guest KSeg0
- kvm_mips_handle_mapped_seg_tlb_fault()
for faults in guest TLB mapped segments
From these functions:
- kvm_trap_emul_handle_tlb_mod() (write_fault = true)
in response to a write to a read-only page (exccode = MOD)
- kvm_trap_emul_handle_tlb_miss() (write_fault = true or false)
in response to a read or write when TLB mapping absent or invalid
(exccode = TLBL/TLBS)
- via the kvm_trap_emul_gva_fault() helper when KVM needs to directly
access GVA space:
- kvm_get_inst() (write_fault = false)
when reading an instruction from guest RAM (when BadInstr/BadInstrP
registers unavailable) which needs to be emulated, i.e. reserved
instruction (exccode = RI), cop0 unusuable (exccode = CPU), MMIO
load/store (TLBL/TLBS/MOD/ADEL/ADES), branch delay slot handling
for MMIO load/store, or debug output for an unhandled exccode
(exccode = ?)
- kvm_mips_trans_replace() (write_fault = true)
to write a replacement instruction into guest memory (mainly
exccode = CPU)
- kvm_mips_guest_cache_op() (write_fault = false)
cache instruction emulation (exccode = CPU)
So there is a many:many mapping from exccode to write_fault for these
exccodes:
- CPU (CoProcessor Unusable)
could be reading instruction or servicing a CACHE instruction
(write_fault = false) or replacing an instruction (write_fault =
true).
- MOD, TLBS, ADES
could be the write itself (write_fault = true), or a read of the
instruction triggering the exception or the prior branch instruction
(write_fault = false).
Cheers
James
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
rkrcmar@redhat.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/13] KVM: MIPS: Pass type of fault down to kvm_mips_map_page()
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:27:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117132749.GA11733@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20170117132749.Le07xp6nD3tQoACDC3zv0GYfRDSHGEQRSqJDePp93IA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201701171906397244491@zte.com.cn>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3196 bytes --]
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 07:06:39PM +0800, jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn wrote:
> > kvm_mips_map_page() will need to know whether the fault was due to a
> > read or a write in order to support dirty page tracking,
> > KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU, and read only memory regions, so get that information
> > passed down to it via new bool write_fault arguments to various
> > functions.
>
> Hi, James,
>
>
> Maybe it's not good idea to add an argument and pass it down to various functions, it will ,
>
> make the the interface more complicated, have more possibolity, and more difficult to test.
>
kvm_mips_map_page() needs to know is whether it is being triggered in
response to a write, but it is abstracted and independent from what host
exception triggered it. It is only really concerned with the GPA space.
>
>
>
> As far as I can see, what you need is to let kvm_mips_map_page() know the *reason*.
>
> would it be better to let kvm_mips_map_page() get *exccode* from the CP0 directly, or
>
>
> provide any interface to get the fault reason?
I presume you mean from the saved host cause register in the VCPU
context (since intervening exceptions/interrupts will clobber the actual
CP0 Cause register).
It directly needs to know whether it can get away with a read-only
mapping, and although it directly depends on a GVA segment, it doesn't
necessarily relate to a memory access made by the guest.
kvm_mips_map_page() is called via:
- kvm_mips_handle_kseg0_tlb_fault()
for faults in guest KSeg0
- kvm_mips_handle_mapped_seg_tlb_fault()
for faults in guest TLB mapped segments
From these functions:
- kvm_trap_emul_handle_tlb_mod() (write_fault = true)
in response to a write to a read-only page (exccode = MOD)
- kvm_trap_emul_handle_tlb_miss() (write_fault = true or false)
in response to a read or write when TLB mapping absent or invalid
(exccode = TLBL/TLBS)
- via the kvm_trap_emul_gva_fault() helper when KVM needs to directly
access GVA space:
- kvm_get_inst() (write_fault = false)
when reading an instruction from guest RAM (when BadInstr/BadInstrP
registers unavailable) which needs to be emulated, i.e. reserved
instruction (exccode = RI), cop0 unusuable (exccode = CPU), MMIO
load/store (TLBL/TLBS/MOD/ADEL/ADES), branch delay slot handling
for MMIO load/store, or debug output for an unhandled exccode
(exccode = ?)
- kvm_mips_trans_replace() (write_fault = true)
to write a replacement instruction into guest memory (mainly
exccode = CPU)
- kvm_mips_guest_cache_op() (write_fault = false)
cache instruction emulation (exccode = CPU)
So there is a many:many mapping from exccode to write_fault for these
exccodes:
- CPU (CoProcessor Unusable)
could be reading instruction or servicing a CACHE instruction
(write_fault = false) or replacing an instruction (write_fault =
true).
- MOD, TLBS, ADES
could be the write itself (write_fault = true), or a read of the
instruction triggering the exception or the prior branch instruction
(write_fault = false).
Cheers
James
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-17 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201701171906397244491@zte.com.cn>
2017-01-17 13:27 ` James Hogan [this message]
2017-01-17 13:27 ` [PATCH 2/13] KVM: MIPS: Pass type of fault down to kvm_mips_map_page() James Hogan
[not found] <201701191629518310684@zte.com.cn>
2017-01-19 9:08 ` James Hogan
2017-01-19 9:08 ` James Hogan
[not found] <201701181618464411994@zte.com.cn>
2017-01-18 12:12 ` James Hogan
2017-01-18 12:12 ` James Hogan
2017-01-16 12:49 [PATCH 0/13] KVM: MIPS: Dirty logging, SYNC_MMU & READONLY_MEM James Hogan
2017-01-16 12:49 ` [PATCH 2/13] KVM: MIPS: Pass type of fault down to kvm_mips_map_page() James Hogan
2017-01-16 12:49 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170117132749.GA11733@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox