From: Keith Owens <kaos@melbourne.sgi.com>
To: linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ...
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 10:47:37 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29516.971567257@ocs3.ocs-net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 14 Oct 2000 18:12:57 +0200." <20001014181257.C6499@bacchus.dhis.org>
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000 18:12:57 +0200,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 12:11:39PM -0400, Jay Carlson wrote:
>> What's going to happen to glibc 2.0.6? I suspect the embedded people are
>> going to be stuck using it until we figure out how to trim down the binary
>> size of 2.2.
>
>Which why I guess we still have to maintain it for a while or even come
>up with some alternative small libc.
Is there any reason that newlib is not being used for embedded systems?
That is what it was developed for. There is some MIPS support in
newlib, I have no idea if it is complete but it would be better than
starting from scratch. http://sources.redhat.com/newlib/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-14 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-14 5:13 stable binutils, gcc, glibc Jun Sun
2000-10-14 3:55 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-14 4:21 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-14 10:57 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-14 14:51 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-14 14:51 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-14 15:09 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-14 16:11 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-14 16:11 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-14 16:29 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2000-10-14 16:29 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2000-10-16 0:35 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-16 1:33 ` Mike Klar
2000-10-16 1:33 ` Mike Klar
2000-10-16 11:26 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-16 11:26 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-16 11:30 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-16 12:00 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-18 1:59 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-18 1:59 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-18 20:31 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-14 16:11 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-14 16:11 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-14 16:12 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-14 16:22 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2000-10-14 16:22 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2000-10-14 23:47 ` Keith Owens [this message]
2000-10-16 1:07 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-16 7:00 ` Alan Cox
2000-10-16 7:00 ` Alan Cox
2000-10-14 10:55 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-14 12:41 ` Ralf Baechle
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010140730280.17430-100000@spawn.hockeyfiend.com>
2000-10-14 14:25 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-14 17:54 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-16 15:41 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2000-10-18 4:04 ` The initial results (Re: " Jun Sun
2000-10-18 1:33 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-18 9:20 ` Jun Sun
2000-10-18 2:25 ` nick
2000-10-18 9:18 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-18 12:27 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-18 1:57 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-18 12:30 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-18 22:37 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-18 11:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-10-18 17:15 ` Jun Sun
2000-10-20 14:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-11-06 11:43 ` Jay Carlson
2000-11-06 11:43 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-20 11:09 ` Andreas Jaeger
2000-10-20 12:03 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-20 12:03 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-21 1:24 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29516.971567257@ocs3.ocs-net \
--to=kaos@melbourne.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mips@fnet.fr \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox