From: "Jay Carlson" <nop@nop.com>
To: <linux-mips@fnet.fr>, <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: RE: The initial results (Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ...
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:43:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <KEEOIBGCMINLAHMMNDJNIEDGCAAA.nop@nop.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39ED2166.9B5F970@mvista.com>
> I also had success with latest binutils CVS tree. I gave a try to the
> latest gcc, but did not look into it further.
>
> http://sourceware.cygnus.com/binutils
> cvs -z 9 -d :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.cygnus.com:/cvs/src co -D "Oct 13,
> 2000" binutils
OK, I've decided to bite the bullet and try to get current on everything.
Most of the patches I've seen lying around have been integrated into
binutils and gcc. Congratulations!
However, there's still this lingering issue with binutils. The ulfc patches
haven't been integrated, and I'm worried that I'm going to run into the
"binutils generate busted relocs" problem as a result. What's the
resolution of that issue? Patch still needed? Patch not needed if the only
two binutils ever used are 2.8.1 and current-cvs (>2.10)?
Jay
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jay Carlson" <nop@nop.com>
To: linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: RE: The initial results (Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ...
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:43:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <KEEOIBGCMINLAHMMNDJNIEDGCAAA.nop@nop.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20001106114325.RXO7cCr1hDep2tfyrcXMtb0fZXbVfHkn5LleufuB5mc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39ED2166.9B5F970@mvista.com>
> I also had success with latest binutils CVS tree. I gave a try to the
> latest gcc, but did not look into it further.
>
> http://sourceware.cygnus.com/binutils
> cvs -z 9 -d :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.cygnus.com:/cvs/src co -D "Oct 13,
> 2000" binutils
OK, I've decided to bite the bullet and try to get current on everything.
Most of the patches I've seen lying around have been integrated into
binutils and gcc. Congratulations!
However, there's still this lingering issue with binutils. The ulfc patches
haven't been integrated, and I'm worried that I'm going to run into the
"binutils generate busted relocs" problem as a result. What's the
resolution of that issue? Patch still needed? Patch not needed if the only
two binutils ever used are 2.8.1 and current-cvs (>2.10)?
Jay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-06 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-14 5:13 stable binutils, gcc, glibc Jun Sun
2000-10-14 3:55 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-14 4:21 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-14 10:57 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-14 14:51 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-14 14:51 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-14 15:09 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-14 16:11 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-14 16:11 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-14 16:29 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2000-10-14 16:29 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2000-10-16 0:35 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-16 1:33 ` Mike Klar
2000-10-16 1:33 ` Mike Klar
2000-10-16 11:26 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-16 11:26 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-16 11:30 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-16 12:00 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-18 1:59 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-18 1:59 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-18 20:31 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-14 16:11 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-14 16:11 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-14 16:12 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-14 16:22 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2000-10-14 16:22 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2000-10-14 23:47 ` Keith Owens
2000-10-16 1:07 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-16 7:00 ` Alan Cox
2000-10-16 7:00 ` Alan Cox
2000-10-14 10:55 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-14 12:41 ` Ralf Baechle
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010140730280.17430-100000@spawn.hockeyfiend.com>
2000-10-14 14:25 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-14 17:54 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-16 15:41 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2000-10-18 4:04 ` The initial results (Re: " Jun Sun
2000-10-18 1:33 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-18 9:20 ` Jun Sun
2000-10-18 2:25 ` nick
2000-10-18 9:18 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-18 12:27 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-18 1:57 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-18 12:30 ` Florian Lohoff
2000-10-18 22:37 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-10-18 11:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-10-18 17:15 ` Jun Sun
2000-10-20 14:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-11-06 11:43 ` Jay Carlson [this message]
2000-11-06 11:43 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-20 11:09 ` Andreas Jaeger
2000-10-20 12:03 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-20 12:03 ` Jay Carlson
2000-10-21 1:24 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=KEEOIBGCMINLAHMMNDJNIEDGCAAA.nop@nop.com \
--to=nop@nop.com \
--cc=linux-mips@fnet.fr \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox