Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vorobiev Dmitri" <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>
To: "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: "Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	"Vorobiev Dmitri" <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	"Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI: fix the return type of the remove() method in  sgiwd93.c
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:42:16 +0200 (EET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35647.88.114.226.209.1228329736.squirrel@webmail.movial.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228327306.5551.36.camel@localhost.localdomain>

> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 18:52 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 18:08, James Bottomley
>> <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 18:24 +0200, Vorobiev Dmitri wrote:
>> >> > This patch fixes the following compilation warning:
>> >> >
>> >> >   CC [M]  drivers/scsi/sgiwd93.o
>> >> > drivers/scsi/sgiwd93.c:314: warning: initialization from
>> incompatible
>> >> > pointer type
>> >>
>> >> Any news about this one? I think this patch should go via linux-scsi,
>> >> unless you would be insisting on pushing it via linux-mips, in which
>> case
>> >> I'll politely bug Ralf about it. :)
>> >
>> > Looks OK for the local change.
>> >
>> > Globally, having driver->remove and platform_driver->remove return int
>> > instead of void looks wrong.  Particularly when the only use cases are
>> > in drivers/base/ and they all ignore the return code.
>> >
>> > Greg and Kay ... shouldn't we simply redefine the return values for
>> the
>> > remove methods in these structures to return void (and thus match the
>> > use case)?
>>
>> Aren't there many many drivers across the tree, using the "int remove"
>> version?
>
> Yes ... since it's a function prototype.
>
> However, if drivers/base simply discards the return, it's a trap we
> shouldn't be setting.

Hmmm, it does look like the return value is discarded, please see
drivers/base/dd.c::__device_release_driver() for details.

Does this not deserve a good cleanup?

Dmitri

>
> James
>
>
>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Vorobiev Dmitri" <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	Vorobiev Dmitri <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI: fix the return type of the remove() method in sgiwd93.c
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:42:16 +0200 (EET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35647.88.114.226.209.1228329736.squirrel@webmail.movial.fi> (raw)
Message-ID: <20081203184216.68zPmXkU7q5Zx9KJRa61zYl-gOO6NVtjKDdFtf9HKC8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228327306.5551.36.camel@localhost.localdomain>

> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 18:52 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 18:08, James Bottomley
>> <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 18:24 +0200, Vorobiev Dmitri wrote:
>> >> > This patch fixes the following compilation warning:
>> >> >
>> >> >   CC [M]  drivers/scsi/sgiwd93.o
>> >> > drivers/scsi/sgiwd93.c:314: warning: initialization from
>> incompatible
>> >> > pointer type
>> >>
>> >> Any news about this one? I think this patch should go via linux-scsi,
>> >> unless you would be insisting on pushing it via linux-mips, in which
>> case
>> >> I'll politely bug Ralf about it. :)
>> >
>> > Looks OK for the local change.
>> >
>> > Globally, having driver->remove and platform_driver->remove return int
>> > instead of void looks wrong.  Particularly when the only use cases are
>> > in drivers/base/ and they all ignore the return code.
>> >
>> > Greg and Kay ... shouldn't we simply redefine the return values for
>> the
>> > remove methods in these structures to return void (and thus match the
>> > use case)?
>>
>> Aren't there many many drivers across the tree, using the "int remove"
>> version?
>
> Yes ... since it's a function prototype.
>
> However, if drivers/base simply discards the return, it's a trap we
> shouldn't be setting.

Hmmm, it does look like the return value is discarded, please see
drivers/base/dd.c::__device_release_driver() for details.

Does this not deserve a good cleanup?

Dmitri

>
> James
>
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-03 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-20  0:19 [PATCH] SCSI: fix the return type of the remove() method in sgiwd93.c Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-12-03 16:24 ` Vorobiev Dmitri
2008-12-03 16:24   ` Vorobiev Dmitri
2008-12-03 17:08   ` James Bottomley
2008-12-03 17:08     ` James Bottomley
2008-12-03 17:52     ` Kay Sievers
2008-12-03 18:01       ` James Bottomley
2008-12-03 18:42         ` Vorobiev Dmitri [this message]
2008-12-03 18:42           ` Vorobiev Dmitri
2008-12-03 18:51           ` Kay Sievers
2008-12-03 19:00             ` James Bottomley
2008-12-03 20:29               ` Kay Sievers
2008-12-03 20:52                 ` James Bottomley
2008-12-03 20:59                   ` Kay Sievers
2008-12-03 21:02                     ` James Bottomley
2008-12-03 21:28                       ` Kay Sievers
2008-12-03 21:33                         ` James Bottomley
2008-12-03 21:41                           ` Kay Sievers
2009-01-02 16:25                             ` James Bottomley
2009-01-02 16:31                               ` Kay Sievers
2009-01-02 16:32                                 ` James Bottomley
2008-12-03 19:07             ` Vorobiev Dmitri
2008-12-03 19:07               ` Vorobiev Dmitri
2008-12-03 19:10               ` Vorobiev Dmitri
2008-12-03 19:10                 ` Vorobiev Dmitri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35647.88.114.226.209.1228329736.squirrel@webmail.movial.fi \
    --to=dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox