From: Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Cc: Atsushi Nemoto <nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: setup_frame() failure
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 09:28:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B9C6B81.94FB616@mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20010908013638.A19154@dea.linux-mips.net
Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 08:26:52PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
>
> > I found that if setup_frame() fails in certain conditions the process
> > which caused the signal grabs CPU and never be killed.
> >
> > Here is a sample test program.
> >
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > #include <stdlib.h>
> > #include <signal.h>
> >
> > void sighandler(int sig)
> > {
> > printf("SIGNAL %d!\n", sig);
> > exit(2);
> > }
> > void setup_signal(int sig)
> > {
> > struct sigaction act;
> > memset(&act, 0, sizeof(act));
> > act.sa_handler = sighandler;
> > act.sa_flags = SA_NOMASK | SA_RESTART;
> > sigaction(sig, &act, 0);
> > }
> >
> > int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > setup_signal(SIGILL);
> > setup_signal(SIGQUIT);
> > setup_signal(SIGINT);
> >
> > __asm__ __volatile__("move $29,$0");
> > __asm__ __volatile__("mfc0 $0,$0");
> > printf("done!\n");
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> >
> > This program setups signal handlers and causes Coprocessor Unusable
> > Exception with $sp == 0.
> >
> > If we run this program,
> >
> > 1. "mfc1" instruction raises a exception.
> > 2. The exception handler queues SIGILL(4).
> > 3. do_signal() dequeue a signal with LOWEST number.
> > 4. setup_frame() fails and queues SIGSEGV(11).
> > 5. returns to user process.
> > 6. again from 1. (forever)
> >
> > So, even SIGKILL can not kill the process. (SIGHUP can do it).
> >
> > I make a change for do_signal() to check failure of setup_frame() and
> > continue processing pending signals. It seems work for me. Here is
> > the patch. Any comments are welcome.
>
> Nice test case. Thanks. I decied for a differnet fix attached below.
I like the printout then getting a Reserved Instruction Exception, it indicates a
problem and things are much easier to debug when getting such messages.
So it would be a pity, if we need to get rid of that.
>
> Ralf
>
> Index: arch/mips64/kernel/traps.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/pub/cvs/linux/arch/mips64/kernel/traps.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.20
> diff -u -r1.20 traps.c
> --- arch/mips64/kernel/traps.c 2001/07/11 23:32:54 1.20
> +++ arch/mips64/kernel/traps.c 2001/09/07 23:29:16
> @@ -347,11 +347,9 @@
>
> void do_ri(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - printk("Cpu%d[%s:%d] Illegal instruction at %08lx ra=%08lx\n",
> - smp_processor_id(), current->comm, current->pid, regs->cp0_epc,
> - regs->regs[31]);
> if (compute_return_epc(regs))
> return;
> +
> force_sig(SIGILL, current);
> }
>
> @@ -388,6 +386,7 @@
> return;
>
> bad_cid:
> + compute_return_epc(regs);
> force_sig(SIGILL, current);
> }
>
> Index: arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/pub/cvs/linux/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.78
> diff -u -r1.78 traps.c
> --- arch/mips/kernel/traps.c 2001/09/06 13:22:24 1.78
> +++ arch/mips/kernel/traps.c 2001/09/07 23:29:16
> @@ -606,9 +606,6 @@
>
> asmlinkage void do_ri(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - unsigned int opcode;
> -
> - get_insn_opcode(regs, &opcode);
> if (compute_return_epc(regs))
> return;
>
> @@ -659,6 +656,7 @@
> return;
>
> bad_cid:
> + compute_return_epc(regs);
> force_sig(SIGILL, current);
> }
>
--
_ _ ____ ___ Carsten Langgaard Mailto:carstenl@mips.com
|\ /|||___)(___ MIPS Denmark Direct: +45 4486 5527
| \/ ||| ____) Lautrupvang 4B Switch: +45 4486 5555
TECHNOLOGIES 2750 Ballerup Fax...: +45 4486 5556
Denmark http://www.mips.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-10 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-07 11:26 setup_frame() failure Atsushi Nemoto
2001-09-07 23:36 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-09-10 2:44 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2001-09-12 4:09 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2001-09-13 1:11 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-09-14 2:16 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2001-09-14 20:14 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-09-17 3:28 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2001-09-10 7:28 ` Carsten Langgaard [this message]
2001-09-10 9:19 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B9C6B81.94FB616@mips.com \
--to=carstenl@mips.com \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp \
--cc=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox