Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tnt.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Linux/MIPS Development <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6 on AMD Alchemy Au1500
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:46:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4017D96F.2080202@246tNt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040128153627.GB14580@linux-mips.org>



>>>Ok. Is it available on some CVS / www page ?
>>>If we eventually choose Au1500 as platform I may be able to test it as 
>>>well and bug reports.
>>>      
>>>
>>No yet, but I'll email it to the mailing list in the next couple of
>>days. I would consider it Beta.
>>
>>    
>>
Ok, anyway I don't yet have a board ...

>>Just curious, why 2.6? 2.4 is solid, everything works, provides a mature
>>kernel and drivers ...?
>>    
>>
>
>Because in the not too far future the Linux community will largely run
>away from 2.4?  In fact the motivation of many developers to continue
>with 2.4 is quite down already and Marcelo is going to put 2.4 into
>deep freeze after 2.4.25.
>
>  
>
Yes that's one of my main reason. And by the time the products ships to 
customers it will be tested. I think that one more person testing it is 
one more person able to find/debug problems.
There are also some features that are natively in 2.6 and requires 
external patches / drivers in a 2.4 series kernel ( ipsec, preemption, 
alsa, ... )


Sylvain Munaut

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tnt.com>
Cc: Linux/MIPS Development <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6 on AMD Alchemy Au1500
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:46:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4017D96F.2080202@246tNt.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20040128154655.smd7Pf1hhNIXXvmP0uRKbFbUV_THjfN6qO0mPoj1FMM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040128153627.GB14580@linux-mips.org>



>>>Ok. Is it available on some CVS / www page ?
>>>If we eventually choose Au1500 as platform I may be able to test it as 
>>>well and bug reports.
>>>      
>>>
>>No yet, but I'll email it to the mailing list in the next couple of
>>days. I would consider it Beta.
>>
>>    
>>
Ok, anyway I don't yet have a board ...

>>Just curious, why 2.6? 2.4 is solid, everything works, provides a mature
>>kernel and drivers ...?
>>    
>>
>
>Because in the not too far future the Linux community will largely run
>away from 2.4?  In fact the motivation of many developers to continue
>with 2.4 is quite down already and Marcelo is going to put 2.4 into
>deep freeze after 2.4.25.
>
>  
>
Yes that's one of my main reason. And by the time the products ships to 
customers it will be tested. I think that one more person testing it is 
one more person able to find/debug problems.
There are also some features that are natively in 2.6 and requires 
external patches / drivers in a 2.4 series kernel ( ipsec, preemption, 
alsa, ... )


Sylvain Munaut

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-28 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-28 10:44 Linux 2.6 on AMD Alchemy Au1500 Sylvain Munaut
2004-01-28 15:03 ` Dan Malek
2004-01-28 15:15   ` Sylvain Munaut
2004-01-28 15:05 ` Pete Popov
2004-01-28 15:18   ` Sylvain Munaut
2004-01-28 15:22     ` Pete Popov
2004-01-28 15:36       ` Ralf Baechle
2004-01-28 15:46         ` Sylvain Munaut [this message]
2004-01-28 15:46           ` Sylvain Munaut
2004-01-28 15:57         ` Dan Malek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4017D96F.2080202@246tNt.com \
    --to=tnt@246tnt.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox