* __stq_u parameter
@ 2004-09-23 15:24 Pavel Kiryukhin
2004-09-23 20:59 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Kiryukhin @ 2004-09-23 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips; +Cc: Pavel Kiryukhin
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 78 bytes --]
Sorry,
does this make sense for 2.4.x kernels?
----
Regards,
Pavel Kiryukhin
[-- Attachment #2: unaligned.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 427 bytes --]
--- linux/include/asm-mips/unaligned.h_org 2004-09-23 15:54:37.000000000 +0400
+++ linux/include/asm-mips/unaligned.h 2004-09-23 18:32:48.000000000 +0400
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
/*
* Store doubleword ununaligned.
*/
-static inline void __stq_u(unsigned long __val, unsigned long long * __addr)
+static inline void __stq_u(unsigned long long __val, unsigned long long * __addr)
{
__asm__("usw\t%1, %0\n\t"
"usw\t%D1, 4+%0"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: __stq_u parameter
2004-09-23 15:24 __stq_u parameter Pavel Kiryukhin
@ 2004-09-23 20:59 ` Ralf Baechle
2004-09-24 14:19 ` __stq_u parameter (and related XFS filesystem 1.3 & 1.3.1 problems on 2.4.x) Pavel Kiryukhin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2004-09-23 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Kiryukhin; +Cc: linux-mips
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 07:24:47PM +0400, Pavel Kiryukhin wrote:
> Sorry,
> does this make sense for 2.4.x kernels?
Once uppon a time it made ...
The file has been rewritten completly since then.
Thanks anyway,
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: __stq_u parameter (and related XFS filesystem 1.3 & 1.3.1 problems on 2.4.x)
2004-09-23 20:59 ` Ralf Baechle
@ 2004-09-24 14:19 ` Pavel Kiryukhin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Kiryukhin @ 2004-09-24 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips; +Cc: Ralf Baechle, Pavel Kiryukhin
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 463 bytes --]
Just in case it may help somebody..
This patch is necessary for normal 1.3 and 1.3.1 XFS filesystem
operations on mips targets (LE especially) with old (2.4) kernels.
----
Pavel
Ralf Baechle wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 07:24:47PM +0400, Pavel Kiryukhin wrote:
>
>
>
>>Sorry,
>>does this make sense for 2.4.x kernels?
>>
>>
>
>Once uppon a time it made ...
>
>The file has been rewritten completly since then.
>
>Thanks anyway,
>
> Ralf
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 917 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-24 14:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-23 15:24 __stq_u parameter Pavel Kiryukhin
2004-09-23 20:59 ` Ralf Baechle
2004-09-24 14:19 ` __stq_u parameter (and related XFS filesystem 1.3 & 1.3.1 problems on 2.4.x) Pavel Kiryukhin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox