* NPTL
@ 2005-04-08 17:11 Greg Weeks
2005-04-08 17:20 ` NPTL sjhill
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Weeks @ 2005-04-08 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips
I saw the kernel support patch (TLS) a while back and ment to ask what
state the gcc/glibc patches were in. Has either been picked up into the
gnu projects yet? If they're close I might try building a toolchain and
root file system with NPTL to try our test suite on.
Greg Weeks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: NPTL
2005-04-08 17:11 NPTL Greg Weeks
@ 2005-04-08 17:20 ` sjhill
2005-04-08 17:21 ` NPTL Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-08 17:25 ` NPTL Manish Lachwani
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: sjhill @ 2005-04-08 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Weeks; +Cc: linux-mips
> I saw the kernel support patch (TLS) a while back and ment to ask what
> state the gcc/glibc patches were in. Has either been picked up into the
> gnu projects yet? If they're close I might try building a toolchain and
> root file system with NPTL to try our test suite on.
>
The kernel patch has not gone in and probably will not until a lot more
testing has been done. All of the changes to binutils, gcc and glibc
have been checked in and are available from HEAD of cvs for respective
repositories.
-Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: NPTL
2005-04-08 17:20 ` NPTL sjhill
@ 2005-04-08 17:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-08 17:23 ` NPTL sjhill
2005-04-08 17:25 ` NPTL Manish Lachwani
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2005-04-08 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sjhill; +Cc: Greg Weeks, linux-mips
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 12:20:09PM -0500, sjhill@realitydiluted.com wrote:
> > I saw the kernel support patch (TLS) a while back and ment to ask what
> > state the gcc/glibc patches were in. Has either been picked up into the
> > gnu projects yet? If they're close I might try building a toolchain and
> > root file system with NPTL to try our test suite on.
> >
> The kernel patch has not gone in and probably will not until a lot more
> testing has been done.
Why do you say that?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: NPTL
2005-04-08 17:21 ` NPTL Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2005-04-08 17:23 ` sjhill
2005-04-08 18:18 ` NPTL Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: sjhill @ 2005-04-08 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: sjhill, Greg Weeks, linux-mips
> > The kernel patch has not gone in and probably will not until a lot more
> > testing has been done.
>
> Why do you say that?
>
I just made that assumption based on the fact that it is not in CVS
yet, at least it was not yesterday. Did I mis-speak?
-Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: NPTL
2005-04-08 17:20 ` NPTL sjhill
2005-04-08 17:21 ` NPTL Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2005-04-08 17:25 ` Manish Lachwani
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Manish Lachwani @ 2005-04-08 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sjhill; +Cc: Greg Weeks, linux-mips
sjhill@realitydiluted.com wrote:
>>I saw the kernel support patch (TLS) a while back and ment to ask what
>>state the gcc/glibc patches were in. Has either been picked up into the
>>gnu projects yet? If they're close I might try building a toolchain and
>>root file system with NPTL to try our test suite on.
>>
>>
>>
>The kernel patch has not gone in and probably will not until a lot more
>testing has been done. All of the changes to binutils, gcc and glibc
>have been checked in and are available from HEAD of cvs for respective
>repositories.
>
>-Steve
>
>
>
Steve,
I thought the kernel patch was well tested by Daniel.
Thanks
Manish Lachwani
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: NPTL
2005-04-08 17:23 ` NPTL sjhill
@ 2005-04-08 18:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2005-04-08 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sjhill; +Cc: Greg Weeks, linux-mips
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 12:23:35PM -0500, sjhill@realitydiluted.com wrote:
> > > The kernel patch has not gone in and probably will not until a lot more
> > > testing has been done.
> >
> > Why do you say that?
> >
> I just made that assumption based on the fact that it is not in CVS
> yet, at least it was not yesterday. Did I mis-speak?
I imagine it will go in exactly when Ralf and Maciej are ready for it
to :-) It is extremely well tested already.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-08 18:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-08 17:11 NPTL Greg Weeks
2005-04-08 17:20 ` NPTL sjhill
2005-04-08 17:21 ` NPTL Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-08 17:23 ` NPTL sjhill
2005-04-08 18:18 ` NPTL Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-08 17:25 ` NPTL Manish Lachwani
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox