From: "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@realitydiluted.com>
To: Aaditya Rai <arai@atheros.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: mips 2.4 vs 2.6 stability.
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:14:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4359AEAD.8010604@realitydiluted.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43598DFE.8040100@atheros.com>
Aaditya Rai wrote:
> Hi everyone, I've searched the list for an answer and gotten, "there's
> no stable release; check out from cvs" ;-)
> I'm trying to figure out if there are stability issues with mips port of
> 2.6? Specifically for 24K? Is mips-2.4 generally considered to be more
> stable?
>
Use 2.6 if you are working with 24K. Yes, it is stable that's why we are
using 2.6 and not 2.5 because the even numbers are stable releases. *sigh*
Geesh, kids these days.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-22 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-22 0:55 mips 2.4 vs 2.6 stability Aaditya Rai
2005-10-22 3:14 ` Steven J. Hill [this message]
2005-10-22 13:29 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4359AEAD.8010604@realitydiluted.com \
--to=sjhill@realitydiluted.com \
--cc=arai@atheros.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox