Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: danieljlaird@hotmail.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	Vitaly Wool <vwool@ru.mvista.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19 timer API changes
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:52:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45880AC4.5010403@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061219.233410.25911550.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>

Hello.

Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

>>When I run the kernel it hangs in the calibrate_delay function. 
>>Eventually the complete kernel does run but it runs very slow. 
>>This is usually an issue with the Timer Interuppt setup etc.  But I have
>>looked at the other MIPS ports and seem to have made the same changes. 

>>On the PNX8550 it does not use the CP0 timer but use a different timer (the
>>Custom MIPS core has 3 extra timers) 

> Hmm, do the TIMER1 and CP0_COUNTER run at same speed?  If no, the
> PNX8550 port should be broken (i.e. gettimeofday() did not work
> properly) even without the timer API changes.  You should provide
> custom clocksource.mips_read (previously named mips_hpt_read) function
> which returns TIMER1 counter value.  If the TIMER1 was not 32-bit
> free-run counter, some trick would be required.  Refer sb1250 or
> jmr3927 for example.

    I would like to discourage you from repeating those JMR3927 clocksource 
"tricks" when you have 3 spare count/compare regs. This will warrant troubles 
when clockevents support gets merged into mainline (in fact, it was not 
necessary even on JMR3927 which has 3 timers). Although, if the timer isn't 
auto-reloading (I assume it isn't), the trick shouldn't be needed.

> ---
> Atsushi Nemoto

WBR, Sergei

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-12-19 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-18  9:15 2.6.19 timer API changes Daniel Laird
2006-12-19  8:17 ` Daniel Laird
2006-12-19 14:34   ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-12-19 14:51     ` Daniel Laird
2006-12-19 16:23       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-12-19 15:01     ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-12-19 15:34       ` Daniel Laird
2006-12-19 17:15         ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-12-20  9:37           ` Daniel Laird
2006-12-20 14:12             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-12-20 14:50               ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-12-20 14:50                 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2006-12-20 18:01                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-12-20 15:24             ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-12-20 15:46               ` Daniel Laird
2006-12-20 14:29           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-12-20 15:40             ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-12-20 15:48               ` Daniel Laird
2006-12-20 15:48             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-12-19 15:52     ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2006-12-19 16:29       ` Atsushi Nemoto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45880AC4.5010403@ru.mvista.com \
    --to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
    --cc=danieljlaird@hotmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=vwool@ru.mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox