* start_secondary flushing remote icaches?
@ 2007-07-10 18:07 Peter Watkins
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Peter Watkins @ 2007-07-10 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips; +Cc: Peter Watkins
Greetings,
I'm updating our port to 2.6.22 and I notice that r4k_flush_icache_range
no longer has a check for irqs_disabled (to force local-only flush).
This hits the BUG_ON(!cpu_online(cpu)) assertion in smp_call_function
since cpu's aren't marked online until after start_secondary:
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8010d394>] smp_call_function+0x84/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8011dec0>] r4k_flush_icache_range+0x28/0x48
[<ffffffff80434a4c>] r4k_cache_init+0x6dc/0x1070
[<ffffffff8042fca0>] per_cpu_trap_init+0x180/0x288
[<ffffffff804304b4>] start_secondary+0x24/0x118
[<ffffffff80101c40>] prom_smp_bootstrap+0x10/0x50
So, the question is, how should the remote icache flush be avoided in
this case?
-p
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-07-10 18:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-10 18:07 start_secondary flushing remote icaches? Peter Watkins
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox