* [PATCH] MIPS: Check the range of the syscall number for o32 syscall on 64bit kernel.
@ 2008-10-31 0:11 David Daney
2008-10-31 0:47 ` David Daney
2008-10-31 14:17 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Daney @ 2008-10-31 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips; +Cc: Malov, Vlad
From: Vlad Malov <Vlad.Malov@caviumnetworks.com>
On a 64 bit kernel if an o32 syscall was made with a syscall number
less than 4000, we would read the function from outside of the bounds
of the syscall table. This led to non-deterministic behavior
including system crashes.
While we were at it we reworked the 32 bit version as well to use
fewer instructions.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Malov <Vlad.Malov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
---
arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S | 9 ++++-----
arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S | 14 +++++++-------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S b/arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S
index 759f680..e638363 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S
@@ -260,16 +260,15 @@ bad_alignment:
END(sys_sysmips)
LEAF(sys_syscall)
+ .set noreorder
subu t0, a0, __NR_O32_Linux # check syscall number
- sltiu v0, t0, __NR_O32_Linux_syscalls + 1
+ beqz t0, einval # do not recurse
+ sltu v0, t0, __NR_O32_Linux_syscalls + 1
sll t1, t0, 3
beqz v0, einval
-
+ .set reorder
lw t2, sys_call_table(t1) # syscall routine
- li v1, 4000 - __NR_O32_Linux # index of sys_syscall
- beq t0, v1, einval # do not recurse
-
/* Some syscalls like execve get their arguments from struct pt_regs
and claim zero arguments in the syscall table. Thus we have to
assume the worst case and shuffle around all potential arguments.
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S b/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
index 6c7ef83..d8b3cb1 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
@@ -174,14 +174,14 @@ not_o32_scall:
END(handle_sys)
LEAF(sys32_syscall)
- sltu v0, a0, __NR_O32_Linux + __NR_O32_Linux_syscalls + 1
+ .set noreorder
+ subu t0, a0, __NR_O32_Linux # check syscall number
+ beqz t0, einval # do not recurse
+ sltu v0, t0, __NR_O32_Linux_syscalls + 1
+ dsll t1, t0, 3
beqz v0, einval
-
- dsll v0, a0, 3
- ld t2, (sys_call_table - (__NR_O32_Linux * 8))(v0)
-
- li v1, 4000 # indirect syscall number
- beq a0, v1, einval # do not recurse
+ .set reorder
+ lw t2, sys_call_table(t1) # syscall routine
move a0, a1 # shift argument registers
move a1, a2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Check the range of the syscall number for o32 syscall on 64bit kernel.
2008-10-31 0:11 [PATCH] MIPS: Check the range of the syscall number for o32 syscall on 64bit kernel David Daney
@ 2008-10-31 0:47 ` David Daney
2008-10-31 14:17 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Daney @ 2008-10-31 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips; +Cc: Malov, Vlad
David Daney wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
> b/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
> index 6c7ef83..d8b3cb1 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
> @@ -174,14 +174,14 @@ not_o32_scall:
> END(handle_sys)
>
> LEAF(sys32_syscall)
> - sltu v0, a0, __NR_O32_Linux + __NR_O32_Linux_syscalls + 1
> + .set noreorder
> + subu t0, a0, __NR_O32_Linux # check syscall number
> + beqz t0, einval # do not recurse
> + sltu v0, t0, __NR_O32_Linux_syscalls + 1
> + dsll t1, t0, 3
> beqz v0, einval
> -
> - dsll v0, a0, 3
> - ld t2, (sys_call_table - (__NR_O32_Linux * 8))(v0)
> -
> - li v1, 4000 # indirect syscall number
> - beq a0, v1, einval # do not recurse
> + .set reorder
> + lw t2, sys_call_table(t1) # syscall routine
>
^^^ Clearly that should be ld not lw. Not sure how that slipped
in, Vlad's original patch had it correct. Re-testing...
David Daney
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Check the range of the syscall number for o32 syscall on 64bit kernel.
2008-10-31 0:11 [PATCH] MIPS: Check the range of the syscall number for o32 syscall on 64bit kernel David Daney
2008-10-31 0:47 ` David Daney
@ 2008-10-31 14:17 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2008-10-31 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Daney; +Cc: linux-mips, Malov, Vlad
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, David Daney wrote:
> @@ -260,16 +260,15 @@ bad_alignment:
> END(sys_sysmips)
>
> LEAF(sys_syscall)
> + .set noreorder
Please indent branch delay slot instructions by one space if using this
mode.
> subu t0, a0, __NR_O32_Linux # check syscall number
> - sltiu v0, t0, __NR_O32_Linux_syscalls + 1
> + beqz t0, einval # do not recurse
> + sltu v0, t0, __NR_O32_Linux_syscalls + 1
Why not sltiu? You do want to fit in the delay slot here. Besides you
should not need .set noreorder here -- GAS should be smart enough to swap
sltiu with beqz here (and then you can actually use sltu quite safely).
The rule of thumb is not to use .set noreorder unless absolutely necessary
(such as modifying one of the registers used by a branch instruction
immediately afterwards in its delay slot) as you have to take all the
pesky details of instruction scheduling into account, including but not
limited to the MIPS I load delay slots not everybody seems to be aware of.
Adjust for the other hunk accordingly.
Maciej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-01 8:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-31 0:11 [PATCH] MIPS: Check the range of the syscall number for o32 syscall on 64bit kernel David Daney
2008-10-31 0:47 ` David Daney
2008-10-31 14:17 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox