Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumba <kumba@gentoo.org>
To: libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>,
	Linux MIPS List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: [PATCH]: R10000 Needs LL/SC Workaround in Glibc
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:01:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <490A912A.8030901@gentoo.org> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 962 bytes --]


The attached patch adds a workaround for R10000 CPUs to use the branch likely 
(beqzl) instruction in atomic operations, because revisions of the CPU before 
3.0 misbehave, while revisions 2.6 and earlier will deadlock.  This issue has 
been noted on SGI IP28 (Indigo2 Impact R10000) systems and SGI IP27 Origin systems.

I drafted it after some discussion with several people in the Linux/MIPS IRC 
Channel after discovering glibc didn't work quite right on my IP28 machine.  The 
patch is based on Debian bug #462112, viewable here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=462112

Feedback would be welcome on any suggestions for improving this patch (please 
CC, as I'm not subscribed to the ML).

Thanks!

-- 
Joshua Kinard
Gentoo/MIPS
kumba@gentoo.org

"The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us.  And our 
lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between."

--Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic

[-- Attachment #2: glibc-trunk-r10k-beqzl.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3766 bytes --]

diff -Naurp libc.orig/ports/sysdeps/mips/bits/atomic.h libc/ports/sysdeps/mips/bits/atomic.h
--- libc.orig/ports/sysdeps/mips/bits/atomic.h	2005-03-28 04:14:59.000000000 -0500
+++ libc/ports/sysdeps/mips/bits/atomic.h	2008-10-30 23:39:37.000000000 -0400
@@ -53,6 +53,31 @@ typedef uintmax_t uatomic_max_t;
 #define MIPS_SYNC_STR_1(X) MIPS_SYNC_STR_2(X)
 #define MIPS_SYNC_STR MIPS_SYNC_STR_1(MIPS_SYNC)
 
+/* Certain revisions of the R10000 Processor need an LL/SC Workaround
+   enabled.  Revisions before 3.0 misbehave on atomic operations, and
+   Revs 2.6 and lower deadlock after several seconds due to other errata.
+
+   To quote the R10K Errata:
+     Workaround: The basic idea is to inhibit the four instructions
+     from simultaneously becoming active in R10000. Padding all
+     ll/sc sequences with nops or changing the looping branch in the
+     routines to a branch likely (which is always predicted taken
+     by R10000) will work. The nops should go after the loop, and the
+     number of them should be 28. This number could be decremented for
+     each additional instruction in the ll/sc loop such as the lock
+     modifier(s) between the ll and sc, the looping branch and its
+     delay slot. For typical short routines with one ll/sc loop, any
+     instructions after the loop could also count as a decrement. The
+     nop workaround pollutes the cache more but would be a few cycles
+     faster if all the code is in the cache and the looping branch
+     is predicted not taken.  */
+
+#ifndef (_MIPS_ARCH_R10000)
+#define R10K_BEQZ_INSN "beqz	%1,1b\n"
+#else
+#define R10K_BEQZ_INSN "beqzl	%1,1b\n"
+#endif
+
 /* Compare and exchange.  For all of the "xxx" routines, we expect a
    "__prev" and a "__cmp" variable to be provided by the enclosing scope,
    in which values are returned.  */
@@ -74,7 +99,7 @@ typedef uintmax_t uatomic_max_t;
      "bne	%0,%2,2f\n\t"						      \
      "move	%1,%3\n\t"						      \
      "sc	%1,%4\n\t"						      \
-     "beqz	%1,1b\n"						      \
+     R10K_BEQZ_INSN							      \
      acq	"\n\t"							      \
      ".set	pop\n"							      \
      "2:\n\t"								      \
@@ -98,7 +123,7 @@ typedef uintmax_t uatomic_max_t;
      "bne	%0,%2,2f\n\t"						      \
      "move	%1,%3\n\t"						      \
      "scd	%1,%4\n\t"						      \
-     "beqz	%1,1b\n"						      \
+     R10K_BEQZ_INSN							      \
      acq	"\n\t"							      \
      ".set	pop\n"							      \
      "2:\n\t"								      \
@@ -192,7 +217,7 @@ typedef uintmax_t uatomic_max_t;
      "ll	%0,%3\n\t"						      \
      "move	%1,%2\n\t"						      \
      "sc	%1,%3\n\t"						      \
-     "beqz	%1,1b\n"						      \
+     R10K_BEQZ_INSN							      \
      acq	"\n\t"							      \
      ".set	pop\n"							      \
      "2:\n\t"								      \
@@ -216,7 +241,7 @@ typedef uintmax_t uatomic_max_t;
      "lld	%0,%3\n\t"						      \
      "move	%1,%2\n\t"						      \
      "scd	%1,%3\n\t"						      \
-     "beqz	%1,1b\n"						      \
+     R10K_BEQZ_INSN							      \
      acq	"\n\t"							      \
      ".set	pop\n"							      \
      "2:\n\t"								      \
@@ -251,7 +276,7 @@ typedef uintmax_t uatomic_max_t;
      "ll	%0,%3\n\t"						      \
      "addu	%1,%0,%2\n\t"						      \
      "sc	%1,%3\n\t"						      \
-     "beqz	%1,1b\n"						      \
+     R10K_BEQZ_INSN							      \
      acq	"\n\t"							      \
      ".set	pop\n"							      \
      "2:\n\t"								      \
@@ -275,7 +300,7 @@ typedef uintmax_t uatomic_max_t;
      "lld	%0,%3\n\t"						      \
      "daddu	%1,%0,%2\n\t"						      \
      "scd	%1,%3\n\t"						      \
-     "beqz	%1,1b\n"						      \
+     R10K_BEQZ_INSN							      \
      acq	"\n\t"							      \
      ".set	pop\n"							      \
      "2:\n\t"								      \

             reply	other threads:[~2008-11-01  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-31  5:01 Kumba [this message]
2008-11-01  7:33 ` [PATCH]: R10000 Needs LL/SC Workaround in Glibc Kumba
2008-11-01 11:26 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-11-04  7:16   ` Kumba
2008-11-01 17:23 ` James Perkins
2008-11-04  7:16   ` Kumba
2008-11-23  4:16   ` Kumba
2009-01-27 15:29     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-01-27 16:13       ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=490A912A.8030901@gentoo.org \
    --to=kumba@gentoo.org \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=libc-ports@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox