Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leonid Yegoshin <yegoshin@mips.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
Cc: "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@mips.com>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	<ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MIPS64R2 core support.
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:55:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F849017.1020706@mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F848957.6000400@mvista.com>

On 04/10/2012 12:26 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
>
>>>> +config 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR
>>>> +    bool "Kernel supports 64 bit physical addresses" if EXPERIMENTAL
>>>> +    depends on 64BIT
>
>>>    This option is selected on 32-bit CPUs like Alchemy, which has 
>>> 36-bit physical address. It will cause a warning about unmet
>
>> Just verified - selected Alchemy and DB1000 board and got
>
>> # CONFIG_64BIT is not set
>> CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y
>> CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y
>
>> ???
>
>    And you didn't get a warning on "select 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR"? Strange, 
> modern Kconfig should spit out one...
>

OK, you right, I missed it in bunch of another. It has sense to add a 
missed dependency.


- Leonid.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leonid Yegoshin <yegoshin@mips.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
Cc: "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@mips.com>,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MIPS64R2 core support.
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:55:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F849017.1020706@mips.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20120410195503.jGmQ5hPgKWxEw8ts9pfo3Gk3_MAY3S9obRsPPsipZJQ@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F848957.6000400@mvista.com>

On 04/10/2012 12:26 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
>
>>>> +config 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR
>>>> +    bool "Kernel supports 64 bit physical addresses" if EXPERIMENTAL
>>>> +    depends on 64BIT
>
>>>    This option is selected on 32-bit CPUs like Alchemy, which has 
>>> 36-bit physical address. It will cause a warning about unmet
>
>> Just verified - selected Alchemy and DB1000 board and got
>
>> # CONFIG_64BIT is not set
>> CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y
>> CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y
>
>> ???
>
>    And you didn't get a warning on "select 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR"? Strange, 
> modern Kconfig should spit out one...
>

OK, you right, I missed it in bunch of another. It has sense to add a 
missed dependency.


- Leonid.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-10 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-09 16:04 [PATCH] Add MIPS64R2 core support Steven J. Hill
2012-04-10 11:49 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-04-10 19:09   ` Leonid Yegoshin
2012-04-10 19:09     ` Leonid Yegoshin
2012-04-10 19:26     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-04-10 19:55       ` Leonid Yegoshin [this message]
2012-04-10 19:55         ` Leonid Yegoshin
2012-04-11 11:53         ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F849017.1020706@mips.com \
    --to=yegoshin@mips.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=sjhill@mips.com \
    --cc=sshtylyov@mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox