Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: ath79: Avoid using unitialized 'reg' variable
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:03:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5225EC3B.1070701@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130903133839.GA10563@linux-mips.org>

On 09/03/13 14:38, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:47:22AM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> Fixes the following build error:
>> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ath79/ath79.h:139:20: error: 'reg' may be used
>> uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>> arch/mips/ath79/common.c:62:6: note: 'reg' was declared here
>> In file included from arch/mips/ath79/common.c:20:0:
>> arch/mips/ath79/common.c: In function 'ath79_device_reset_clear':
>> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ath79/ath79.h:139:20:
>> error: 'reg' may be used uninitialized in this function
>> [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>> arch/mips/ath79/common.c:90:6: note: 'reg' was declared here
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2013-08/msg00126.html
>> - Remove BUG(). panic() is enough.
>> http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2013-08/msg00133.html
>> - Change panic() message to be more accurate.
>> http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2013-08/msg00164.html
>> ---
>>   arch/mips/ath79/common.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/ath79/common.c b/arch/mips/ath79/common.c
>> index eb3966c..6d7a9d4 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/ath79/common.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/ath79/common.c
>> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ void ath79_device_reset_set(u32 mask)
>>   	else if (soc_is_qca955x())
>>   		reg = QCA955X_RESET_REG_RESET_MODULE;
>>   	else
>> -		BUG();
>> +		panic("Reset register not defined for this SOC");
>>
>>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&ath79_device_reset_lock, flags);
>>   	t = ath79_reset_rr(reg);
>> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void ath79_device_reset_clear(u32 mask)
>>   	else if (soc_is_qca955x())
>>   		reg = QCA955X_RESET_REG_RESET_MODULE;
>>   	else
>> -		BUG();
>> +		panic("Reset register not defined for this SOC");
>>
>>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&ath79_device_reset_lock, flags);
>>   	t = ath79_reset_rr(reg);
>
> Looks more like the implementation of BUG() is wrong and gcc doesn't
> notice that BUG() won't return.
>
> Was this triggered by CONFIG_BUG=n?
>
>    Ralf
>

Hi Ralf,

Yes it was triggered by CONFIG_BUG=n

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: ath79: Avoid using unitialized 'reg' variable
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:03:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5225EC3B.1070701@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20130903140339.dcsjOzkXYdRI8lQjhfra-vKRXAGyD1UCA_3674wk0T8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130903133839.GA10563@linux-mips.org>

On 09/03/13 14:38, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:47:22AM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> Fixes the following build error:
>> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ath79/ath79.h:139:20: error: 'reg' may be used
>> uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>> arch/mips/ath79/common.c:62:6: note: 'reg' was declared here
>> In file included from arch/mips/ath79/common.c:20:0:
>> arch/mips/ath79/common.c: In function 'ath79_device_reset_clear':
>> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ath79/ath79.h:139:20:
>> error: 'reg' may be used uninitialized in this function
>> [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>> arch/mips/ath79/common.c:90:6: note: 'reg' was declared here
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2013-08/msg00126.html
>> - Remove BUG(). panic() is enough.
>> http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2013-08/msg00133.html
>> - Change panic() message to be more accurate.
>> http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2013-08/msg00164.html
>> ---
>>   arch/mips/ath79/common.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/ath79/common.c b/arch/mips/ath79/common.c
>> index eb3966c..6d7a9d4 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/ath79/common.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/ath79/common.c
>> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ void ath79_device_reset_set(u32 mask)
>>   	else if (soc_is_qca955x())
>>   		reg = QCA955X_RESET_REG_RESET_MODULE;
>>   	else
>> -		BUG();
>> +		panic("Reset register not defined for this SOC");
>>
>>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&ath79_device_reset_lock, flags);
>>   	t = ath79_reset_rr(reg);
>> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void ath79_device_reset_clear(u32 mask)
>>   	else if (soc_is_qca955x())
>>   		reg = QCA955X_RESET_REG_RESET_MODULE;
>>   	else
>> -		BUG();
>> +		panic("Reset register not defined for this SOC");
>>
>>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&ath79_device_reset_lock, flags);
>>   	t = ath79_reset_rr(reg);
>
> Looks more like the implementation of BUG() is wrong and gcc doesn't
> notice that BUG() won't return.
>
> Was this triggered by CONFIG_BUG=n?
>
>    Ralf
>

Hi Ralf,

Yes it was triggered by CONFIG_BUG=n

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-03 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-21 10:47 [PATCH v2] MIPS: ath79: Avoid using unitialized 'reg' variable Markos Chandras
2013-08-21 10:47 ` Markos Chandras
2013-08-21 16:40 ` Gabor Juhos
2013-09-03 13:38 ` Ralf Baechle
2013-09-03 14:03   ` Markos Chandras [this message]
2013-09-03 14:03     ` Markos Chandras
2013-09-18 13:45     ` Ralf Baechle
2013-09-18 13:51       ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5225EC3B.1070701@imgtec.com \
    --to=markos.chandras@imgtec.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox