From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
<linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: mm: c-r4k: Detect instruction cache aliases
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:17:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E93795.8000205@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52E94404.8050303@cogentembedded.com>
On 01/29/2014 06:10 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 01/29/2014 04:41 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>>>> The *Aptiv cores can use the CONF7/IAR bit to detect if the core
>>>> has hardware support to remove instruction cache aliasing.
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> This patch is for the upstream-sfr/mips-for-linux-next tree
>>> [...]
>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c b/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c
>>>> index 13b549a..e790524 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c
>>>> @@ -1110,7 +1110,10 @@ static void probe_pcache(void)
>>>> case CPU_PROAPTIV:
>>>> if (current_cpu_type() == CPU_74K)
>>>> alias_74k_erratum(c);
>>>> - if ((read_c0_config7() & (1 << 16))) {
>>>> + if (!(read_c0_config7() & MIPS_CONF7_IAR))
>>>> + if (c->icache.waysize > PAGE_SIZE)
>
>>> Why not fold these to a single *if*?
>
>> I suppose I could do that. Thanks
>
>>>> + c->icache.flags |= MIPS_CACHE_ALIASES;
>>>> + if (read_c0_config7() & MIPS_CONF7_AR) {
>
>>> You didn't document this change. Ideally, it should be in a separate
>>> patch.
>
>> Nothing has changed. Instead of using the '16' magic value, I just
>> documented
>> that bit along with the IAR one.
>
> You should have noted that in the changelog, at least.
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
>
Ok I will submit a v2 soon. Thanks for the review.
--
markos
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: mm: c-r4k: Detect instruction cache aliases
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:17:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E93795.8000205@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20140129171709.oO7HheTUhq144i8GCryy5C2G-PY5nG_ni-CF2QHAKw0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52E94404.8050303@cogentembedded.com>
On 01/29/2014 06:10 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 01/29/2014 04:41 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>>>> The *Aptiv cores can use the CONF7/IAR bit to detect if the core
>>>> has hardware support to remove instruction cache aliasing.
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> This patch is for the upstream-sfr/mips-for-linux-next tree
>>> [...]
>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c b/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c
>>>> index 13b549a..e790524 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c
>>>> @@ -1110,7 +1110,10 @@ static void probe_pcache(void)
>>>> case CPU_PROAPTIV:
>>>> if (current_cpu_type() == CPU_74K)
>>>> alias_74k_erratum(c);
>>>> - if ((read_c0_config7() & (1 << 16))) {
>>>> + if (!(read_c0_config7() & MIPS_CONF7_IAR))
>>>> + if (c->icache.waysize > PAGE_SIZE)
>
>>> Why not fold these to a single *if*?
>
>> I suppose I could do that. Thanks
>
>>>> + c->icache.flags |= MIPS_CACHE_ALIASES;
>>>> + if (read_c0_config7() & MIPS_CONF7_AR) {
>
>>> You didn't document this change. Ideally, it should be in a separate
>>> patch.
>
>> Nothing has changed. Instead of using the '16' magic value, I just
>> documented
>> that bit along with the IAR one.
>
> You should have noted that in the changelog, at least.
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
>
Ok I will submit a v2 soon. Thanks for the review.
--
markos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-29 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-29 13:10 [PATCH] MIPS: mm: c-r4k: Detect instruction cache aliases Markos Chandras
2014-01-29 13:10 ` Markos Chandras
2014-01-29 13:31 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-01-29 13:41 ` Markos Chandras
2014-01-29 13:41 ` Markos Chandras
2014-01-29 18:10 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-01-29 17:17 ` Markos Chandras [this message]
2014-01-29 17:17 ` Markos Chandras
2014-01-30 17:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Markos Chandras
2014-01-30 17:21 ` Markos Chandras
2014-01-30 18:33 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-01-30 17:35 ` Markos Chandras
2014-01-30 17:35 ` Markos Chandras
2014-02-04 15:57 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E93795.8000205@imgtec.com \
--to=markos.chandras@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox