From: "Steven J. Hill" <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Add 1074K CPU support explicitly.
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:30:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F50A18.7020008@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140207130737.GG19285@linux-mips.org>
On 02/07/2014 07:07 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 03:03:50PM -0600, Steven J. Hill wrote:
>
>> The 1074K is a multiprocessing coherent processing system (CPS) based
>> on modified 74K cores. This patch makes the 1074K an actual unique
>> CPU type, instead of a 74K derivative, which it is not.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
>
> I've also come to the conclusion that this seems to be the right
> thing. I'm still undecided on the urgency, 3.14 or later? For now I'm
> going to drop this into the 3.15 queue.
>
It is kind of urgent, so please get it into 3.14 is possible. Thanks.
Steve
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Steven J. Hill" <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Add 1074K CPU support explicitly.
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:30:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F50A18.7020008@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20140207163016.fRC2EQXTuunpOcvYC9DVRl3Mfla-HLG5pL8RFmJgsH4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140207130737.GG19285@linux-mips.org>
On 02/07/2014 07:07 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 03:03:50PM -0600, Steven J. Hill wrote:
>
>> The 1074K is a multiprocessing coherent processing system (CPS) based
>> on modified 74K cores. This patch makes the 1074K an actual unique
>> CPU type, instead of a 74K derivative, which it is not.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
>
> I've also come to the conclusion that this seems to be the right
> thing. I'm still undecided on the urgency, 3.14 or later? For now I'm
> going to drop this into the 3.15 queue.
>
It is kind of urgent, so please get it into 3.14 is possible. Thanks.
Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-07 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-17 21:03 [PATCH] MIPS: Add 1074K CPU support explicitly Steven J. Hill
2014-02-07 13:07 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-02-07 16:30 ` Steven J. Hill [this message]
2014-02-07 16:30 ` Steven J. Hill
2014-03-22 22:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F50A18.7020008@imgtec.com \
--to=steven.hill@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox