From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.15] MIPS: Add new AUDIT_ARCH token for the N32 ABI on MIPS64
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 08:47:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5368939D.9030801@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5360C13A.5040902@imgtec.com>
On 04/30/2014 10:24 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 04/24/2014 08:19 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 03:40:36 PM Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> A MIPS64 kernel may support ELF files for all 3 MIPS ABIs
>>> (O32, N32, N64). Furthermore, the AUDIT_ARCH_MIPS{,EL}64 token
>>> does not provide enough information about the ABI for the 64-bit
>>> process. As a result of which, userland needs to use complex
>>> seccomp filters to decide whether a syscall belongs to the o32 or n32
>>> or n64 ABI. Therefore, a new arch token for MIPS64/n32 is added so it
>>> can be used by seccomp to explicitely set syscall filters for this ABI.
>>>
>>> Link: http://sourceforge.net/p/libseccomp/mailman/message/32239040/
>>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
>>> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
>>> ---
>>> Ralf, can we please have this in 3.15 (Assuming it's ACK'd)?
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>> ---
>>> arch/mips/include/asm/syscall.h | 2 ++
>>> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> I'm far from qualified to ACK any MIPS specific patches, but I do want to add
>> my support for this patch. As Markos states above, without this patch any
>> seccomp BPF code will be more complex than necessary (see x32 for an idea) and
>> projects that try to abstract away the arch/ABI specific nature of the BPF
>> seccomp filters will be have to do a lot more work. Please merge this patch,
>> or something similar, along with the MIPS BPF seccomp filters in 3.15; waiting
>> until 3.16 will be too late.
>>
>> I also don't want to speak for the audit folks (Eric?), but I think you'll
>> hear that this patch makes life much easier for them as well.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Paul
>
> Ralf ping? Can we please have this in 3.15 so userspace application get
> the updated token instead of using the AUDIT_ARCH_MIPS{,EL}64 for both
> n32 and n64? It may be harder to change it once 3.15 is released (ABI
> break).
>
Ralf ping again? With -r5 approaching, there might be limited time left
to push this.
--
markos
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.15] MIPS: Add new AUDIT_ARCH token for the N32 ABI on MIPS64
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 08:47:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5368939D.9030801@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20140506074741.jeO6WJTaMuh4sML_HuJ3oTq3xxHFn4wFp4ScrFzWy98@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5360C13A.5040902@imgtec.com>
On 04/30/2014 10:24 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 04/24/2014 08:19 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 03:40:36 PM Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> A MIPS64 kernel may support ELF files for all 3 MIPS ABIs
>>> (O32, N32, N64). Furthermore, the AUDIT_ARCH_MIPS{,EL}64 token
>>> does not provide enough information about the ABI for the 64-bit
>>> process. As a result of which, userland needs to use complex
>>> seccomp filters to decide whether a syscall belongs to the o32 or n32
>>> or n64 ABI. Therefore, a new arch token for MIPS64/n32 is added so it
>>> can be used by seccomp to explicitely set syscall filters for this ABI.
>>>
>>> Link: http://sourceforge.net/p/libseccomp/mailman/message/32239040/
>>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
>>> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
>>> ---
>>> Ralf, can we please have this in 3.15 (Assuming it's ACK'd)?
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>> ---
>>> arch/mips/include/asm/syscall.h | 2 ++
>>> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> I'm far from qualified to ACK any MIPS specific patches, but I do want to add
>> my support for this patch. As Markos states above, without this patch any
>> seccomp BPF code will be more complex than necessary (see x32 for an idea) and
>> projects that try to abstract away the arch/ABI specific nature of the BPF
>> seccomp filters will be have to do a lot more work. Please merge this patch,
>> or something similar, along with the MIPS BPF seccomp filters in 3.15; waiting
>> until 3.16 will be too late.
>>
>> I also don't want to speak for the audit folks (Eric?), but I think you'll
>> hear that this patch makes life much easier for them as well.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Paul
>
> Ralf ping? Can we please have this in 3.15 so userspace application get
> the updated token instead of using the AUDIT_ARCH_MIPS{,EL}64 for both
> n32 and n64? It may be harder to change it once 3.15 is released (ABI
> break).
>
Ralf ping again? With -r5 approaching, there might be limited time left
to push this.
--
markos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-06 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1397550996-14805-1-git-send-email-markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
[not found] ` <1397738551.2725.18.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <534FCF75.7060708@imgtec.com>
[not found] ` <4648181.no7KCQCtEi@sifl>
[not found] ` <534FFBCF.5010800@imgtec.com>
[not found] ` <1397750939.750.1.camel@localhost>
2014-04-17 16:20 ` [libseccomp-discuss] [PATCH v3 0/2] Add support for MIPS BE/LE and O32 ABI Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-17 16:24 ` Markos Chandras
2014-04-17 16:24 ` Markos Chandras
2014-04-17 19:13 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-04-17 19:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-17 20:07 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-04-17 20:30 ` Paul Moore
2014-04-22 14:40 ` [PATCH 3.15] MIPS: Add new AUDIT_ARCH token for the N32 ABI on MIPS64 Markos Chandras
2014-04-22 14:40 ` Markos Chandras
2014-04-24 19:19 ` Paul Moore
2014-04-30 9:24 ` Markos Chandras
2014-04-30 9:24 ` Markos Chandras
2014-05-06 7:47 ` Markos Chandras [this message]
2014-05-06 7:47 ` Markos Chandras
2014-05-08 14:10 ` Paul Moore
2014-05-12 18:53 ` Paul Moore
2014-05-12 19:09 ` Eric Paris
2014-05-21 20:59 ` Paul Moore
2014-05-21 21:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-21 22:10 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5368939D.9030801@imgtec.com \
--to=markos.chandras@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox