Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use dedicated RI/XI exceptions for MIPSR5 cores
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:44:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C62D56.7090401@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C5780B.1090602@gmail.com>

Hi David,

On 07/15/2014 07:50 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 07/15/2014 06:09 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patchset adds support for unique RI/XI exceptions. This feature has
>> been added in MIPSr5. Using this feature, we reduce the time it takes
>> to deal with a TLB exception caused by the RI/XI bits since the TLB load
>> handler is skipped and we use the tlb_do_page_failt_0 path directly.
>>
>> This patch depends on the Hardware Page Table Walker (HTW) patchset
>> http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2014-07/msg00195.html
> 
> They are unrelated features, why the dependency?
Because of the conflicts in cpu.h and cpu-features.h. I am just trying
to make Ralf' life easier when he tries to determine the order to apply
this patches.

-- 
markos

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use dedicated RI/XI exceptions for MIPSR5 cores
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:44:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C62D56.7090401@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20140716074422.raYQudN2GFu7XG-DVII0d9XCB3Zk5mzhPwgiJGnr_94@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C5780B.1090602@gmail.com>

Hi David,

On 07/15/2014 07:50 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 07/15/2014 06:09 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patchset adds support for unique RI/XI exceptions. This feature has
>> been added in MIPSr5. Using this feature, we reduce the time it takes
>> to deal with a TLB exception caused by the RI/XI bits since the TLB load
>> handler is skipped and we use the tlb_do_page_failt_0 path directly.
>>
>> This patch depends on the Hardware Page Table Walker (HTW) patchset
>> http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2014-07/msg00195.html
> 
> They are unrelated features, why the dependency?
Because of the conflicts in cpu.h and cpu-features.h. I am just trying
to make Ralf' life easier when he tries to determine the order to apply
this patches.

-- 
markos

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-16  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-15 13:09 [PATCH 0/3] Use dedicated RI/XI exceptions for MIPSR5 cores Markos Chandras
2014-07-15 13:09 ` Markos Chandras
2014-07-15 13:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] MIPS: Add new option for unique RI/XI exceptions Markos Chandras
2014-07-15 13:09   ` Markos Chandras
2014-07-15 16:09   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-07-16  7:45     ` Markos Chandras
2014-07-16  7:45       ` Markos Chandras
2014-07-15 13:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: Use dedicated exception handler if CPU supports " Markos Chandras
2014-07-15 13:09   ` Markos Chandras
2014-07-15 13:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] MIPS: kernel: cpu-probe: Detect unique " Markos Chandras
2014-07-15 13:09   ` Markos Chandras
2014-07-15 18:50 ` [PATCH 0/3] Use dedicated RI/XI exceptions for MIPSR5 cores David Daney
2014-07-16  7:44   ` Markos Chandras [this message]
2014-07-16  7:44     ` Markos Chandras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53C62D56.7090401@imgtec.com \
    --to=markos.chandras@imgtec.com \
    --cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox