From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>,
Linux MIPS List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: IP27: CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE triggers bus errors
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:22:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5460CA1D.9060907@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141110112039.GA7294@alpha.franken.de>
On 11/10/2014 06:20, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:51:06AM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>> Thomas,
>>
>> can you test CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE on an IP28?
>>
>> All in all the R10000's TLB is unproblematic; my gut feeling is that
>> rather something else specific to IP27 is spoiling the broth.
>
> I'll give it a spin later today.
>
> Thomas.
Try testing with and without CONFIG_HUGETLBFS in the kernel. File systems ->
Pseudo filesystems -> HugeTLB file system support
So far, it seems adding that option in with CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE makes
both IP27 and IP30 behave. Without, I get data bus errors or segfaults on IP27
running Gentoo's "emerge" program on PAGE_SIZE_4K.
IP30 seems to be fine on an R12000 with or without that option, but I only have
a dual R12K module to test against. I've only had the R14K dual module for a
few days, and I could not reproduce the bus errors on that module, either. So
I wonder if there is something funny with the hardware on the single R14K
module, which I did get IBE's on before. And whether that will behave once
CONFIG_HUGETLBFS is in the kernel.
If so, maybe the fix is to make CONFIG_HUGETLBFS automatically selected if
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE?
--J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-10 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-02 10:53 IP27: CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE triggers bus errors Joshua Kinard
2014-11-03 18:52 ` David Daney
2014-11-04 1:08 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-11-04 1:23 ` David Daney
2014-11-04 1:34 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-11-04 1:43 ` David Daney
2014-11-04 5:51 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-11-05 9:07 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-11-05 10:21 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-11-05 16:09 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-11-07 10:22 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-11-07 18:30 ` David Daney
2014-11-09 0:09 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-11-10 7:04 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-11-10 10:51 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-11-10 11:20 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2014-11-10 14:22 ` Joshua Kinard [this message]
2014-11-10 16:55 ` David Daney
2014-11-10 17:03 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-11-10 17:29 ` David Daney
2014-11-11 11:11 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-11-10 21:30 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2014-11-11 7:47 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-11-11 9:24 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2014-11-11 9:38 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-11-10 11:22 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-11-05 13:52 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5460CA1D.9060907@gentoo.org \
--to=kumba@gentoo.org \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox