From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>,
<linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] MIPS: MT: Remove "weak" from vpe_run() declaration
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:27:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A392AB.9030702@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150712231120.11177.53145.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3072 bytes --]
On 13/07/15 00:11, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Weak header file declarations are error-prone because they make every
> definition weak, and the linker chooses one based on link order (see
> 10629d711ed7 ("PCI: Remove __weak annotation from pcibios_get_phb_of_node
> decl")).
>
> That's not a problem for vpe_run() because Kconfig ensures there's never
> more than one definition:
>
> - vpe_run() is defined in arch/mips/kernel/vpe-mt.c if
> CONFIG_MIPS_VPE_LOADER_MT=y
>
> - vpe_run() is defined in arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-amon.c if
> CONFIG_MIPS_CMP=y
>
> - CONFIG_MIPS_VPE_LOADER_MT cannot be set if CONFIG_MIPS_CMP=y
>
> But it's simpler to verify correctness if we remove "weak" from the picture
> and test the config symbols directly.
>
> Remove "weak" from the vpe_run() declaration and use #if to test whether a
> definition should be present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/vpe.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c | 10 +++++-----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/vpe.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/vpe.h
> index 7849f39..80e70db 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/vpe.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/vpe.h
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ void release_vpe(struct vpe *v);
> void *alloc_progmem(unsigned long len);
> void release_progmem(void *ptr);
>
> -int __weak vpe_run(struct vpe *v);
> +int vpe_run(struct vpe *v);
> void cleanup_tc(struct tc *tc);
>
> int __init vpe_module_init(void);
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
> index 72cae9f..04539d6 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
> @@ -817,15 +817,11 @@ static int vpe_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>
> static int vpe_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> {
> +#if defined(CONFIG_MIPS_VPE_LOADER_MT) || defined(CONFIG_MIPS_CMP)
That should be CONFIG_MIPS_VPE_LOADER_CMP, in which case the error case
in the #else bit is always dead code. This file is built only if
CONFIG_MIPS_VPE_LOADER, and the other ones are defined without prompts:
config MIPS_VPE_LOADER_CMP
bool
default "y"
depends on MIPS_VPE_LOADER && MIPS_CMP
config MIPS_VPE_LOADER_MT
bool
default "y"
depends on MIPS_VPE_LOADER && !MIPS_CMP
I.e. one xor the other must be "y" when MIPS_VPE_LOADER=y.
Maybe its worth just removing the weak and the vpe_run check?
Cheers
James
> struct vpe *v;
> Elf_Ehdr *hdr;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (!vpe_run) {
> - pr_warn("VPE loader: ELF load failed.\n");
> - return -ENOEXEC;
> - }
> -
> v = get_vpe(aprp_cpu_index());
> if (v == NULL)
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -855,6 +851,10 @@ static int vpe_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> v->plen = 0;
>
> return ret;
> +#else
> + pr_warn("VPE loader: ELF load failed.\n");
> + return -ENOEXEC;
> +#endif
> }
>
> static ssize_t vpe_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] MIPS: MT: Remove "weak" from vpe_run() declaration
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:27:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A392AB.9030702@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20150713102755.7w3KbGr1StB02CtQNBzKswROPELtc8h5JkroU7JVOFU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150712231120.11177.53145.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3072 bytes --]
On 13/07/15 00:11, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Weak header file declarations are error-prone because they make every
> definition weak, and the linker chooses one based on link order (see
> 10629d711ed7 ("PCI: Remove __weak annotation from pcibios_get_phb_of_node
> decl")).
>
> That's not a problem for vpe_run() because Kconfig ensures there's never
> more than one definition:
>
> - vpe_run() is defined in arch/mips/kernel/vpe-mt.c if
> CONFIG_MIPS_VPE_LOADER_MT=y
>
> - vpe_run() is defined in arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-amon.c if
> CONFIG_MIPS_CMP=y
>
> - CONFIG_MIPS_VPE_LOADER_MT cannot be set if CONFIG_MIPS_CMP=y
>
> But it's simpler to verify correctness if we remove "weak" from the picture
> and test the config symbols directly.
>
> Remove "weak" from the vpe_run() declaration and use #if to test whether a
> definition should be present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/vpe.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c | 10 +++++-----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/vpe.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/vpe.h
> index 7849f39..80e70db 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/vpe.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/vpe.h
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ void release_vpe(struct vpe *v);
> void *alloc_progmem(unsigned long len);
> void release_progmem(void *ptr);
>
> -int __weak vpe_run(struct vpe *v);
> +int vpe_run(struct vpe *v);
> void cleanup_tc(struct tc *tc);
>
> int __init vpe_module_init(void);
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
> index 72cae9f..04539d6 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
> @@ -817,15 +817,11 @@ static int vpe_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>
> static int vpe_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> {
> +#if defined(CONFIG_MIPS_VPE_LOADER_MT) || defined(CONFIG_MIPS_CMP)
That should be CONFIG_MIPS_VPE_LOADER_CMP, in which case the error case
in the #else bit is always dead code. This file is built only if
CONFIG_MIPS_VPE_LOADER, and the other ones are defined without prompts:
config MIPS_VPE_LOADER_CMP
bool
default "y"
depends on MIPS_VPE_LOADER && MIPS_CMP
config MIPS_VPE_LOADER_MT
bool
default "y"
depends on MIPS_VPE_LOADER && !MIPS_CMP
I.e. one xor the other must be "y" when MIPS_VPE_LOADER=y.
Maybe its worth just removing the weak and the vpe_run check?
Cheers
James
> struct vpe *v;
> Elf_Ehdr *hdr;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (!vpe_run) {
> - pr_warn("VPE loader: ELF load failed.\n");
> - return -ENOEXEC;
> - }
> -
> v = get_vpe(aprp_cpu_index());
> if (v == NULL)
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -855,6 +851,10 @@ static int vpe_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> v->plen = 0;
>
> return ret;
> +#else
> + pr_warn("VPE loader: ELF load failed.\n");
> + return -ENOEXEC;
> +#endif
> }
>
> static ssize_t vpe_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-12 23:10 [PATCH 0/9] MIPS: Remove "weak" usage Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-12 23:10 ` [PATCH 1/9] MIPS: CPC: Remove "weak" from mips_cpc_phys_base() and make it static Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 2/9] MIPS: Remove "weak" from platform_maar_init() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 9:46 ` James Hogan
2015-07-13 9:46 ` James Hogan
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 3/9] MIPS: VPE: Exit vpe_release() early if vpe_run() isn't defined Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 4/9] MIPS: MT: Remove "weak" from vpe_run() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 10:27 ` James Hogan [this message]
2015-07-13 10:27 ` James Hogan
2015-07-13 21:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 5/9] MIPS: Remove "weak" from get_c0_perfcount_int() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 9:43 ` James Hogan
2015-07-13 9:43 ` James Hogan
2015-07-13 21:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 6/9] MIPS: Remove "weak" from get_c0_compare_int() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 9:36 ` James Hogan
2015-07-13 9:36 ` James Hogan
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 7/9] MIPS: Remove "weak" from get_c0_fdc_int() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 9:31 ` James Hogan
2015-07-13 9:31 ` James Hogan
2015-07-12 23:11 ` [PATCH 8/9] MIPS: Remove "weak" from mips_cdmm_phys_base() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 9:20 ` James Hogan
2015-07-13 9:20 ` James Hogan
2015-07-12 23:12 ` [PATCH 9/9] MIPS: Remove "__weak" definition from arch-specific linkage.h Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-13 10:08 ` James Hogan
2015-07-13 10:08 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A392AB.9030702@imgtec.com \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=abrestic@chromium.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox