From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 01/10] MIPS: Add SysRq operation to dump TLBs on all CPUs
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:27:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A4D601.8070604@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1505261230020.11225@eddie.linux-mips.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2707 bytes --]
On 26/05/15 12:58, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2015, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
>>> Add a MIPS specific SysRq operation to dump the TLB entries on all CPUs,
>>> using the 'x' trigger key.
>>
>> Thought: Would it make sense to split apart the data such that one SysRq key
>> dumps the CP0 registers of all CPUs, and another dumps the TLB info?
>
> That would be a large separate project, probing a CPU for its implemented
> CP0 registers is a complex matter.
>
> I did it for GDB and a bare-iron debug stub a few years ago and back then
> there were IIRC 53 register subsets already defined for MIPS architecture
> processors, wired to various, sometimes overlapping feature bits of CP0
> Config registers, and now there are more. Plus legacy processors require
> fixed register maps according to CP0.PRId.
>
> James, I think what you proposed is good enough for TLB diagnostics (I'm
> not sure if dumping EntryLo0 and EntryLo1 registers has any use, but it
> surely does not hurt either).
>
>>> + pr_info("CPU%d:\n", smp_processor_id());
>>> + pr_info("Index : %0x\n", read_c0_index());
>>> + pr_info("Pagemask: %0x\n", read_c0_pagemask());
>>> + pr_info("EntryHi : %0*lx\n", field, read_c0_entryhi());
>>> + pr_info("EntryLo0: %0*lx\n", field, read_c0_entrylo0());
>>> + pr_info("EntryLo1: %0*lx\n", field, read_c0_entrylo1());
>>> + pr_info("Wired : %0x\n", read_c0_wired());
>>> + pr_info("Pagegrain: %0x\n", read_c0_pagegrain());
>
> Please capitalise these consistently: PageMask and PageGrain.
>
>> The older CPUs, like the R10000 don't have a PageGrain register I believe (at
>> least R10K doesn't), Does that need to be stuffed behind a conditional? Also,
>> R10K (and newer?) CPUs have a FrameMask CP0 register ($21). Linux currently
>> scribbles a 0 to the writable bits, though, so I'm not sure if it matters.
>
> First of all I suggest that this part is split off into separate small
> helper functions within dump_tlb.c and r3k_dump_tlb.c. This code is not
> performance-critical, so the overhead of an extra function call isn't of
> a concern.
>
> Then R3k processors have Index, EntryHi and EntryLo (rather than
> EntryLo0) registers only; some Toshiba processors have Wired too (cf.
> `r3k_have_wired_reg').
>
> And for the R4k-style TLB the PageGrain register does need to be probed
> for. I think including FrameMask would be good too, that shouldn't be
> difficult (switch on `current_cpu_type'?).
Thanks for all the feedback Joshua and Maciej, and sorry for the delay
getting back to this. I think I've addressed it all now, so I'll submit
a second patchset soon.
Cheers
James
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 01/10] MIPS: Add SysRq operation to dump TLBs on all CPUs
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:27:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A4D601.8070604@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20150714092729.5TzzanSamxgmhOyk0I7-deZVGr-RZzmS5c4Rcb-MGgU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1505261230020.11225@eddie.linux-mips.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2707 bytes --]
On 26/05/15 12:58, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2015, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
>>> Add a MIPS specific SysRq operation to dump the TLB entries on all CPUs,
>>> using the 'x' trigger key.
>>
>> Thought: Would it make sense to split apart the data such that one SysRq key
>> dumps the CP0 registers of all CPUs, and another dumps the TLB info?
>
> That would be a large separate project, probing a CPU for its implemented
> CP0 registers is a complex matter.
>
> I did it for GDB and a bare-iron debug stub a few years ago and back then
> there were IIRC 53 register subsets already defined for MIPS architecture
> processors, wired to various, sometimes overlapping feature bits of CP0
> Config registers, and now there are more. Plus legacy processors require
> fixed register maps according to CP0.PRId.
>
> James, I think what you proposed is good enough for TLB diagnostics (I'm
> not sure if dumping EntryLo0 and EntryLo1 registers has any use, but it
> surely does not hurt either).
>
>>> + pr_info("CPU%d:\n", smp_processor_id());
>>> + pr_info("Index : %0x\n", read_c0_index());
>>> + pr_info("Pagemask: %0x\n", read_c0_pagemask());
>>> + pr_info("EntryHi : %0*lx\n", field, read_c0_entryhi());
>>> + pr_info("EntryLo0: %0*lx\n", field, read_c0_entrylo0());
>>> + pr_info("EntryLo1: %0*lx\n", field, read_c0_entrylo1());
>>> + pr_info("Wired : %0x\n", read_c0_wired());
>>> + pr_info("Pagegrain: %0x\n", read_c0_pagegrain());
>
> Please capitalise these consistently: PageMask and PageGrain.
>
>> The older CPUs, like the R10000 don't have a PageGrain register I believe (at
>> least R10K doesn't), Does that need to be stuffed behind a conditional? Also,
>> R10K (and newer?) CPUs have a FrameMask CP0 register ($21). Linux currently
>> scribbles a 0 to the writable bits, though, so I'm not sure if it matters.
>
> First of all I suggest that this part is split off into separate small
> helper functions within dump_tlb.c and r3k_dump_tlb.c. This code is not
> performance-critical, so the overhead of an extra function call isn't of
> a concern.
>
> Then R3k processors have Index, EntryHi and EntryLo (rather than
> EntryLo0) registers only; some Toshiba processors have Wired too (cf.
> `r3k_have_wired_reg').
>
> And for the R4k-style TLB the PageGrain register does need to be probed
> for. I think including FrameMask would be good too, that shouldn't be
> difficult (switch on `current_cpu_type'?).
Thanks for all the feedback Joshua and Maciej, and sorry for the delay
getting back to this. I think I've addressed it all now, so I'll submit
a second patchset soon.
Cheers
James
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-14 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-19 8:50 [PATCH v2 00/10] MIPS: dump_tlb improvements James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/10] MIPS: Add SysRq operation to dump TLBs on all CPUs James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-24 21:21 ` Joshua Kinard
2015-05-26 11:58 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-05-27 13:09 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-07-14 9:27 ` James Hogan [this message]
2015-07-14 9:27 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] MIPS: hazards: Add hazard macros for tlb read James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-26 12:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-05-26 12:53 ` Ralf Baechle
2015-05-26 13:25 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-05-26 13:32 ` Ralf Baechle
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] MIPS: mipsregs.h: Add EntryLo bit definitions James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-28 23:47 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Use tlbr hazard macros James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Refactor TLB matching James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Make use of EntryLo bit definitions James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Take global bit into account James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Take EHINV " James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Take RI/XI bits " James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] MIPS: dump_tlb: Take XPA " James Hogan
2015-05-19 8:50 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A4D601.8070604@imgtec.com \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=kumba@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox