From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Cc: <alex@alex-smith.me.uk>, Alex Smith <alex.smith@imgtec.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] irqchip: irq-mips-gic: Provide function to map GIC user section
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:22:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56123331.3010200@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56091CA1.1030808@arm.com>
Hi,
On 09/28/2015 11:55 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 28/09/15 11:11, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> From: Alex Smith <alex.smith@imgtec.com>
>>
>> The GIC provides a "user-mode visible" section containing a mirror of
>> the counter registers which can be mapped into user memory. This will
>> be used by the VDSO time function implementations, so provide a
>> function to map it in.
>>
>> When the GIC is not enabled in Kconfig a dummy inline version of this
>> function is provided, along with "#define gic_present 0", so that we
>> don't have to litter the VDSO code with ifdefs.
>>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Smith <alex.smith@imgtec.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>> include/linux/irqchip/mips-gic.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
>> index af2f16bb8a94..c995b199ca32 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>> #include <linux/irq.h>
>> #include <linux/irqchip.h>
>> #include <linux/irqchip/mips-gic.h>
>> +#include <linux/mm.h>
>> #include <linux/of_address.h>
>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>> #include <linux/smp.h>
>> @@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ struct gic_pcpu_mask {
>> DECLARE_BITMAP(pcpu_mask, GIC_MAX_INTRS);
>> };
>>
>> +static unsigned long gic_base_addr;
>> static void __iomem *gic_base;
>> static struct gic_pcpu_mask pcpu_masks[NR_CPUS];
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gic_lock);
>> @@ -301,6 +303,19 @@ int gic_get_c0_fdc_int(void)
>> GIC_LOCAL_TO_HWIRQ(GIC_LOCAL_INT_FDC));
>> }
>>
>> +int gic_map_user_section(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long base,
>> + unsigned long size)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long pfn;
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(!gic_present);
>
> Why do you have a BUG() here, while you're just returning -1 in the case
> where CONFIG_MIPS_GIC is not refined? This feels overly harsh to me.
I suppose i could change that to return -1 if git_present is not true.
>
>> + BUG_ON(size > USM_VISIBLE_SECTION_SIZE);
>
> Same here.
But I think this is different. The size of mapping has to be less than
USM_VISIBLE_SECTION_SIZE because that's the maximum data size exposed by
the GIC chip for userspace use. So if that's not true, then BUG_ON seems
like a sensible thing to do.
>
> - Does this code have to be in the irqchip driver? It really feels out
> of place, and I'd rather see a function that returns the mappable range
> to the VDSO code, where the mapping would occur.
>
> Thanks,
>
That does seem like a good idea. I will have a look
--
markos
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: alex@alex-smith.me.uk, Alex Smith <alex.smith@imgtec.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] irqchip: irq-mips-gic: Provide function to map GIC user section
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:22:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56123331.3010200@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20151005082209.nxqWCTk0oOLPKa-D_c8sudrTpeaPLmy0iwujlJRythE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56091CA1.1030808@arm.com>
Hi,
On 09/28/2015 11:55 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 28/09/15 11:11, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> From: Alex Smith <alex.smith@imgtec.com>
>>
>> The GIC provides a "user-mode visible" section containing a mirror of
>> the counter registers which can be mapped into user memory. This will
>> be used by the VDSO time function implementations, so provide a
>> function to map it in.
>>
>> When the GIC is not enabled in Kconfig a dummy inline version of this
>> function is provided, along with "#define gic_present 0", so that we
>> don't have to litter the VDSO code with ifdefs.
>>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Smith <alex.smith@imgtec.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>> include/linux/irqchip/mips-gic.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
>> index af2f16bb8a94..c995b199ca32 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>> #include <linux/irq.h>
>> #include <linux/irqchip.h>
>> #include <linux/irqchip/mips-gic.h>
>> +#include <linux/mm.h>
>> #include <linux/of_address.h>
>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>> #include <linux/smp.h>
>> @@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ struct gic_pcpu_mask {
>> DECLARE_BITMAP(pcpu_mask, GIC_MAX_INTRS);
>> };
>>
>> +static unsigned long gic_base_addr;
>> static void __iomem *gic_base;
>> static struct gic_pcpu_mask pcpu_masks[NR_CPUS];
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gic_lock);
>> @@ -301,6 +303,19 @@ int gic_get_c0_fdc_int(void)
>> GIC_LOCAL_TO_HWIRQ(GIC_LOCAL_INT_FDC));
>> }
>>
>> +int gic_map_user_section(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long base,
>> + unsigned long size)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long pfn;
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(!gic_present);
>
> Why do you have a BUG() here, while you're just returning -1 in the case
> where CONFIG_MIPS_GIC is not refined? This feels overly harsh to me.
I suppose i could change that to return -1 if git_present is not true.
>
>> + BUG_ON(size > USM_VISIBLE_SECTION_SIZE);
>
> Same here.
But I think this is different. The size of mapping has to be less than
USM_VISIBLE_SECTION_SIZE because that's the maximum data size exposed by
the GIC chip for userspace use. So if that's not true, then BUG_ON seems
like a sensible thing to do.
>
> - Does this code have to be in the irqchip driver? It really feels out
> of place, and I'd rather see a function that returns the mappable range
> to the VDSO code, where the mapping would occur.
>
> Thanks,
>
That does seem like a good idea. I will have a look
--
markos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-05 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-28 10:03 [PATCH 0/3] MIPS VDSO support Markos Chandras
2015-09-28 10:03 ` Markos Chandras
2015-09-28 10:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] MIPS: Initial implementation of a VDSO Markos Chandras
2015-09-28 10:10 ` Markos Chandras
2015-09-28 10:54 ` Alex Smith
2015-09-28 13:07 ` Matthew Fortune
2015-11-20 18:15 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-10-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v2 " Markos Chandras
2015-10-09 8:05 ` Markos Chandras
2015-10-21 8:54 ` [PATCH v3 " Markos Chandras
2015-10-21 8:54 ` Markos Chandras
2015-09-28 10:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] irqchip: irq-mips-gic: Provide function to map GIC user section Markos Chandras
2015-09-28 10:11 ` Markos Chandras
2015-09-28 10:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-28 14:16 ` Qais Yousef
2015-09-28 14:16 ` Qais Yousef
2015-09-28 15:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-05 8:22 ` Markos Chandras [this message]
2015-10-05 8:22 ` Markos Chandras
2015-10-12 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 " Markos Chandras
2015-10-12 9:40 ` Markos Chandras
2015-10-12 9:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-12 10:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-15 9:37 ` Qais Yousef
2015-10-15 9:37 ` Qais Yousef
2015-10-15 10:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-28 10:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] MIPS: VDSO: Add implementations of gettimeofday() and clock_gettime() Markos Chandras
2015-09-28 10:12 ` Markos Chandras
2015-09-28 13:15 ` kbuild test robot
2015-09-28 13:15 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-12 10:24 ` [PATCH v2 " Markos Chandras
2015-10-12 10:24 ` Markos Chandras
2015-10-21 8:57 ` [PATCH v3 " Markos Chandras
2015-10-21 8:57 ` Markos Chandras
2015-10-23 1:41 ` [v3, " Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-23 1:41 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-27 14:47 ` Ralf Baechle
2015-10-27 20:46 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-27 20:46 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-27 21:02 ` David Daney
2015-10-27 21:15 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-27 21:15 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-27 21:44 ` David Daney
2015-10-27 21:49 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-27 21:49 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-28 10:20 ` Alex Smith
2015-10-28 18:21 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-28 18:21 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-28 18:30 ` Alex Smith
2015-10-28 18:57 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-28 18:57 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-28 19:04 ` Alex Smith
2015-10-28 19:28 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-28 19:28 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-28 19:55 ` Alex Smith
2015-10-28 20:15 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-10-28 20:15 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2016-01-25 22:36 ` [PATCH v3 " Hauke Mehrtens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56123331.3010200@imgtec.com \
--to=markos.chandras@imgtec.com \
--cc=alex.smith@imgtec.com \
--cc=alex@alex-smith.me.uk \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox