From: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
To: christophe leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <ysxie@foxmail.com>,
<ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
<boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>, <richard@nod.at>,
<marek.vasut@gmail.com>, <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
<wim@iguana.be>, <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
<b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>, <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
<ralf@linux-mips.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
<lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<jason@lakedaemon.net>, <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, <arnd@arndb.de>,
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
<industrypack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, <wg@grandegger.com>,
<mkl@pengutronix.de>, <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>,
<mchehab@kernel.org>, <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
<a.zummo@towertech.it>, <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
<linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>, <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
<jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
<airlied@linux.ie>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<kvalo@codeaurora.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, <tj@kernel.org>,
<linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
<dvhart@infradead.org>, <andy@infradead.org>,
<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
<jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<vinod.koul@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>, <jslaby@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/27] kill devm_ioremap_nocache
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 09:09:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c0ade63-f4d3-d44d-c622-b091eb2ba902@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c28ac0bc-8bd2-3dce-3167-8c0f80ec601e@c-s.fr>
hi Christophe and Greg,
On 2017/12/24 16:55, christophe leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 23/12/2017 à 16:57, Guenter Roeck a écrit :
>> On 12/23/2017 05:48 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 06:55:25PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> When I tried to use devm_ioremap function and review related code, I found
>>>> devm_ioremap and devm_ioremap_nocache is almost the same with each other,
>>>> except one use ioremap while the other use ioremap_nocache.
>>>
>>> For all arches? Really? Look at MIPS, and x86, they have different
>>> functions.
>>>
>>
>> Both mips and x86 end up mapping the same function, but other arches don't.
>> mn10300 is one where ioremap and ioremap_nocache are definitely different.
>
> alpha: identical
> arc: identical
> arm: identical
> arm64: identical
> cris: different <==
> frv: identical
> hexagone: identical
> ia64: different <==
> m32r: identical
> m68k: identical
> metag: identical
> microblaze: identical
> mips: identical
> mn10300: different <==
> nios: identical
> openrisc: different <==
> parisc: identical
> riscv: identical
> s390: identical
> sh: identical
> sparc: identical
> tile: identical
> um: rely on asm/generic
> unicore32: identical
> x86: identical
> asm/generic (no mmu): identical
Wow, that's correct, sorry for I have just checked the main archs, I means
x86,arm, arm64, mips.
However, I stall have no idea about why these 4 archs want different ioremap
function with others. Drivers seems cannot aware this? If driver call ioremap
want he really want for there 4 archs, cache or nocache?
>
> So 4 among all arches seems to have ioremap() and ioremap_nocache() being different.
>
> Could we have a define set by the 4 arches on which ioremap() and ioremap_nocache() are different, something like HAVE_DIFFERENT_IOREMAP_NOCACHE ?
Then, what the HAVE_DIFFERENT_IOREMAP_NOCACHE is uesed for ?
Thanks
Yisheng
>
> Christophe
>
>>
>> Guenter
>>
>>>> While ioremap's
>>>> default function is ioremap_nocache, so devm_ioremap_nocache also have the
>>>> same function with devm_ioremap, which can just be killed to reduce the size
>>>> of devres.o(from 20304 bytes to 18992 bytes in my compile environment).
>>>>
>>>> I have posted two versions, which use macro instead of function for
>>>> devm_ioremap_nocache[1] or devm_ioremap[2]. And Greg suggest me to kill
>>>> devm_ioremap_nocache for no need to keep a macro around for the duplicate
>>>> thing. So here comes v3 and please help to review.
>>>
>>> I don't think this can be done, what am I missing? These functions are
>>> not identical, sorry for missing that before.
Never mind, I should checked all the arches, sorry about that.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> ---
> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> .
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
To: christophe leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ysxie@foxmail.com,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, richard@nod.at,
marek.vasut@gmail.com, cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
wim@iguana.be, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
jason@lakedaemon.net, marc.zyngier@arm.com, arnd@arndb.de,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
industrypack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, wg@grandegger.com,
mkl@pengutronix.de, linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
mchehab@kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, daniel.vetter@intel.com,
jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, seanpaul@chromium.org,
airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kvalo@codeaurora.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, davem@davemloft.net,
nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
vinod.koul@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, jslaby@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/27] kill devm_ioremap_nocache
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 09:09:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c0ade63-f4d3-d44d-c622-b091eb2ba902@huawei.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20171225010910.MVej3tQq4Rt2vTcmXX01n18ZSTWYhgNNyr1JF1kastg@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c28ac0bc-8bd2-3dce-3167-8c0f80ec601e@c-s.fr>
hi Christophe and Greg,
On 2017/12/24 16:55, christophe leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 23/12/2017 à 16:57, Guenter Roeck a écrit :
>> On 12/23/2017 05:48 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 06:55:25PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> When I tried to use devm_ioremap function and review related code, I found
>>>> devm_ioremap and devm_ioremap_nocache is almost the same with each other,
>>>> except one use ioremap while the other use ioremap_nocache.
>>>
>>> For all arches? Really? Look at MIPS, and x86, they have different
>>> functions.
>>>
>>
>> Both mips and x86 end up mapping the same function, but other arches don't.
>> mn10300 is one where ioremap and ioremap_nocache are definitely different.
>
> alpha: identical
> arc: identical
> arm: identical
> arm64: identical
> cris: different <==
> frv: identical
> hexagone: identical
> ia64: different <==
> m32r: identical
> m68k: identical
> metag: identical
> microblaze: identical
> mips: identical
> mn10300: different <==
> nios: identical
> openrisc: different <==
> parisc: identical
> riscv: identical
> s390: identical
> sh: identical
> sparc: identical
> tile: identical
> um: rely on asm/generic
> unicore32: identical
> x86: identical
> asm/generic (no mmu): identical
Wow, that's correct, sorry for I have just checked the main archs, I means
x86,arm, arm64, mips.
However, I stall have no idea about why these 4 archs want different ioremap
function with others. Drivers seems cannot aware this? If driver call ioremap
want he really want for there 4 archs, cache or nocache?
>
> So 4 among all arches seems to have ioremap() and ioremap_nocache() being different.
>
> Could we have a define set by the 4 arches on which ioremap() and ioremap_nocache() are different, something like HAVE_DIFFERENT_IOREMAP_NOCACHE ?
Then, what the HAVE_DIFFERENT_IOREMAP_NOCACHE is uesed for ?
Thanks
Yisheng
>
> Christophe
>
>>
>> Guenter
>>
>>>> While ioremap's
>>>> default function is ioremap_nocache, so devm_ioremap_nocache also have the
>>>> same function with devm_ioremap, which can just be killed to reduce the size
>>>> of devres.o(from 20304 bytes to 18992 bytes in my compile environment).
>>>>
>>>> I have posted two versions, which use macro instead of function for
>>>> devm_ioremap_nocache[1] or devm_ioremap[2]. And Greg suggest me to kill
>>>> devm_ioremap_nocache for no need to keep a macro around for the duplicate
>>>> thing. So here comes v3 and please help to review.
>>>
>>> I don't think this can be done, what am I missing? These functions are
>>> not identical, sorry for missing that before.
Never mind, I should checked all the arches, sorry about that.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> ---
> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-25 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-23 10:55 [PATCH v3 00/27] kill devm_ioremap_nocache Yisheng Xie
2017-12-23 10:55 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-12-23 13:48 ` Greg KH
2017-12-23 15:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-12-24 8:55 ` christophe leroy
2017-12-25 1:09 ` Yisheng Xie [this message]
2017-12-25 1:09 ` Yisheng Xie
2018-01-03 6:42 ` Yisheng Xie
2018-01-03 6:42 ` Yisheng Xie
2018-01-03 16:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-03 16:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-04 14:52 ` David Howells
2017-12-24 9:05 ` christophe leroy
2017-12-25 1:34 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-12-25 1:34 ` Yisheng Xie
2018-01-04 8:05 ` Christophe LEROY
2018-01-12 9:12 ` Yisheng Xie
2018-01-12 9:12 ` Yisheng Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c0ade63-f4d3-d44d-c622-b091eb2ba902@huawei.com \
--to=xieyisheng1@huawei.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=industrypack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
--cc=ysxie@foxmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox