From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@laronde.org>
Cc: <uclibc@uclibc.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol table entry st_value
Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 14:14:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874qqpg2ti.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <045b01c43155$1e06cd80$8d01010a@prefect> (Bradley D. LaRonde's message of "Mon, 3 May 2004 17:25:11 -0400")
"Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@laronde.org> writes:
> I guess that the point of these procedure stubs is to keep
> pointer-to-function values consistent between executables and share
> libraries. Is that what binutils is trying to accomplish here?
No, it's to enable lazy binding. The idea is that when the dynamic
loader loads libpthread.so, it doesn't need to resolve malloc()
immediately, it can just leave the GOT entry pointing to the stub.
Then, when the stub is called, it will ask the dynamic linker to
find the true address of malloc() and update the GOT accordingly.
This is supposed to reduce start-up time.
An object should never use stubs if takes the address of the function.
It should only use a stub for some symbol foo if every use of foo is
for a direct call.
If the dynamic loader is choosing libpthread's stub over the real
definition in libc.so, that sounds on the face of it like a dynamic
loader bug.
> But should stubs really be getting involved here? As Thiemo Seufer pointed
> out to me, readelf shows me that every undefined symbol in every shared
> library in /lib on my x86 debian box has the st_value member for the symbol
> table entry set to zero.
The x86 and MIPS ABIs are very different though.
Richard
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@laronde.org>
Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol table entry st_value
Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 14:14:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874qqpg2ti.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20040509131433.XB3iiJ7xithi39XS5NM6Fhehsm-WtFbPDYCfR4HtRfA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <045b01c43155$1e06cd80$8d01010a@prefect> (Bradley D. LaRonde's message of "Mon, 3 May 2004 17:25:11 -0400")
"Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@laronde.org> writes:
> I guess that the point of these procedure stubs is to keep
> pointer-to-function values consistent between executables and share
> libraries. Is that what binutils is trying to accomplish here?
No, it's to enable lazy binding. The idea is that when the dynamic
loader loads libpthread.so, it doesn't need to resolve malloc()
immediately, it can just leave the GOT entry pointing to the stub.
Then, when the stub is called, it will ask the dynamic linker to
find the true address of malloc() and update the GOT accordingly.
This is supposed to reduce start-up time.
An object should never use stubs if takes the address of the function.
It should only use a stub for some symbol foo if every use of foo is
for a direct call.
If the dynamic loader is choosing libpthread's stub over the real
definition in libc.so, that sounds on the face of it like a dynamic
loader bug.
> But should stubs really be getting involved here? As Thiemo Seufer pointed
> out to me, readelf shows me that every undefined symbol in every shared
> library in /lib on my x86 debian box has the st_value member for the symbol
> table entry set to zero.
The x86 and MIPS ABIs are very different though.
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-09 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-03 21:25 uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol table entry st_value Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-03 21:25 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-09 13:14 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2004-05-09 13:14 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-09 20:52 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-09 20:52 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-10 7:40 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10 7:40 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10 18:05 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-10 18:05 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-10 18:21 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10 18:21 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10 20:36 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-10 20:36 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-10 20:41 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10 20:41 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10 20:44 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10 20:44 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-11 3:39 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-11 3:39 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-11 5:48 ` [uClibc] Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzerosymbol " Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11 5:48 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11 14:03 ` uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol " Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-11 14:21 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-11 14:21 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-11 14:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-11 16:33 ` [uClibc] Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzerosymbol " Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11 16:33 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11 16:55 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-11 16:55 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-11 21:50 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11 21:50 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-10 12:21 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-10 12:21 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-10 12:36 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-10 12:36 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-10 14:23 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-10 14:23 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11 7:27 ` [uClibc] Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols withnonzerosymbol " Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11 7:27 ` Joakim Tjernlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874qqpg2ti.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=rsandifo@redhat.com \
--cc=brad@laronde.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=uclibc@uclibc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox