* MIPS port kickoff meeting
@ 1996-04-20 0:22 Ariel Faigon
1996-04-23 14:15 ` Alistair Lambie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ariel Faigon @ 1996-04-20 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux
Hi LinuxMIPSies,
This is becoming real. Please mark your calendars.
We have Jamaica in B10U, which holds 12 people, from 4-5pm
on Wednesday April 24th.
I know it may conflict with someone's schedule but p l e a s e
try your best to show up.
THE MEETING HAS ONE MAIN GOAL:
To ensure that when David Miller lands at SGI he wastes
zero time on ramping up. We can do a lot until he comes.
The idea Jim Barton, Larry and I had is:
1) Office + two Indys (connected via a serial line to support
gdb remote protocol) already waiting, phone, email etc.
2) Development tools installed
3) The latest linux sources on the machine. After trying to
compile them and see how smoothly this goes.
4) This may require the most work:
A 99% stripped down IRIX or set-top box thing that is
basically only the device drivers to boot and do:
"hello console"
"hello network"
"hello disk"
"hello keyboard"
"hello console graphics"
Given all this, David can boot Linux in a few days I guess :-)
Agenda:
1) Quick round table: introduce everyone
2) Sort out some details:
Are we going for a 64-bit kernel?
What MIPS instruction set should we support
[e.g. 3K is important for the embedded market]
What dev tools should we use?
elf/coff stabs/dwarf gcc/cc etc. etc.
4) Suggest more ways to accelerate David Miller's ramp up
5) List action items
6) Get volunteers for help on the above
Lastly, since David's Acceptance is final. I think it is time
to put David himself on this mailing list too, he certainly has
some ideas on how to help us help him.
--
Peace, Ariel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: MIPS port kickoff meeting
1996-04-20 0:22 MIPS port kickoff meeting Ariel Faigon
@ 1996-04-23 14:15 ` Alistair Lambie
1996-04-23 16:39 ` Greg Chesson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alistair Lambie @ 1996-04-23 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux
On Apr 19, 5:22pm, Ariel Faigon wrote:
> Subject: MIPS port kickoff meeting
> Hi LinuxMIPSies,
>
> This is becoming real. Please mark your calendars.
>
> We have Jamaica in B10U, which holds 12 people, from 4-5pm
> on Wednesday April 24th.
>
> I know it may conflict with someone's schedule but p l e a s e
> try your best to show up.
>
Umm...could be a problem. It's a holiday here in New Zealand, otherwise :-)
>
> Agenda:
> 1) Quick round table: introduce everyone
> 2) Sort out some details:
> Are we going for a 64-bit kernel?
> What MIPS instruction set should we support
> [e.g. 3K is important for the embedded market]
> What dev tools should we use?
> elf/coff stabs/dwarf gcc/cc etc. etc.
My 2c worth:
1. We should definitely do 32bit, probably 64bit as well. There is a
big base of R3k machines out there that are going to start getting
left behind soon.
2. We need to go for lowest common denominator (MIPS I) and then add
conditionals (in the low level bits) later. The c code can of course be
compiled as the user wants it.
3. We need to support machines that don't have a graphics head (servers).
This requires serial drivers.
4. We should really tie this project in with what is happening at
http://lena.fnet.fr/. Their goal has been to get Linux on ARCS systems
running little endian, but there is a need for a MIPS port for MIPS (the
company) R3k machines which needs to be big endian.
5. Should we use the 'milo' bootloader?
6.
> 4) Suggest more ways to accelerate David Miller's ramp up
> 5) List action items
> 6) Get volunteers for help on the above
>
Probably not much I can do from here. Maybe some Beta testing a bit further
down the track (test for bit inversion in the southern hemisphere :-) ).
I still have an interest in getting Linux on to the old MIPS boxes, so maybe
with a few quick hacks after David has worked his magic I can get this to
happen. I suspect that this would also help CSD out as I know they still get
support calls from people who have these machines and are falling all over the
place with the development environment (svr3, bsd43, svr4). Often they are
little more than people playing and having a Linux offering may be the best way
to get them out of our hair. Also, RISC/os is getting a bit long in the tooth
now and there are still some nasty little bugs in it, often comms related which
more often than not is what the person wanted it for!
One thing that would be nice is for someone to minute the meeting to the list
so that those of us who can't attend can see what's happening. I guess it is
also a good way of documenting the progress as things move along!
Cheers, Alistair
--
Alistair Lambie alambie@wellington.sgi.com
Silicon Graphics New Zealand SGI Voicemail: 56791
Level 5, Walsh Wrightson Tower, Ph: +64-4-802 1455
94-96 Dixon St, Wellington, NZ Fax: +64-4-802 1459
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: MIPS port kickoff meeting
1996-04-23 14:15 ` Alistair Lambie
@ 1996-04-23 16:39 ` Greg Chesson
1996-04-24 2:05 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg Chesson @ 1996-04-23 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alistair Lambie, linux
There are US Gov't customers for Linux on SGI boxes who require
64-bit OS. So, let's support tho 32-bit ARCS boxes without compromising
opportunities to sell new boxes (with 64-bit Linux).
g
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: MIPS port kickoff meeting
@ 1996-04-23 17:22 Larry McVoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Larry McVoy @ 1996-04-23 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Chesson; +Cc: Alistair Lambie, linux
Greg said:
: There are US Gov't customers for Linux on SGI boxes who require
: 64-bit OS. So, let's support tho 32-bit ARCS boxes without compromising
: opportunities to sell new boxes (with 64-bit Linux).
We definitely want to do this. And I don't want to do anything to derail
this because I want this badly. And what I'm about to say does not imply
that we don't do 64bit - I want both. And it should be easy to do both.
One reason for thinking small, however, is that we could finesse the whole
Linux vs IRIX issue by raising awareness that Linux on MIPs could be a
really nice solution for the embedded market. I personally would love
to see a full page in IEEE times in which MIPS announces the availablity
of embedded Linux for MIPs chips. This may be the quickest path to getting
Linux embraced internally. I'm pretty sure that Cygnus would be interested
in signing up for support for such a platform - that is a big part of their
business. And I think that R3K is still the volume chip in the embedded
market, so we want that to work.
Thoughts?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: MIPS port kickoff meeting
@ 1996-04-23 17:25 Larry McVoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Larry McVoy @ 1996-04-23 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm; +Cc: Greg Chesson, Alistair Lambie, linux
Arrg, ignore my message and read Jim's - he said it better. I gotta learn
to read all my mail before firing off replies.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: MIPS port kickoff meeting
1996-04-23 16:39 ` Greg Chesson
@ 1996-04-24 2:05 ` David S. Miller
1996-04-24 4:31 ` Greg Chesson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 1996-04-24 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: greg; +Cc: alambie, linux
From: "Greg Chesson" <greg@xtp.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 09:39:29 -0700
There are US Gov't customers for Linux on SGI boxes who require
64-bit OS. So, let's support tho 32-bit ARCS boxes without
compromising opportunities to sell new boxes (with 64-bit Linux).
Like I said I'll do the 32-bit port and work from there based upon how
I feel after that.
Remember I've got one kernel here which works on every 32-bit CPU type
Sun has every put into a box with almost no performance loss. I can
do it too for MIPS and I will. The goal being that some day I will be
able to slap the same kernel image into an INDY as I can for an ONYX
and a LEGO.
And also, I will design it such that, as in the traditional Linux
kernel model, you can config all this shit out and get the streamlined
minimal kernel which only works with a certain configuation. (MM code,
config it out because this is for an embedded system)
Later,
David S. Miller
davem@caip.rutgers.edu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: MIPS port kickoff meeting
1996-04-24 2:05 ` David S. Miller
@ 1996-04-24 4:31 ` Greg Chesson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg Chesson @ 1996-04-24 4:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: alambie, linux
agreed.
we should begin with the version of Linux that is the most natural
port for you. The other versions can come later. Note however that
Lego may prefer a 64-bit kernel.
g
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1996-04-24 4:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1996-04-20 0:22 MIPS port kickoff meeting Ariel Faigon
1996-04-23 14:15 ` Alistair Lambie
1996-04-23 16:39 ` Greg Chesson
1996-04-24 2:05 ` David S. Miller
1996-04-24 4:31 ` Greg Chesson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-04-23 17:22 Larry McVoy
1996-04-23 17:25 Larry McVoy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox