Re: [PATCH 5/7] MIPS: dec: Remove dec_irq_dispatch()

[Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>]

On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 12:23:13PM +0800, WangYuli wrote:
> Hi Maciej,
> 
> On 2025/3/1 00:01, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> >   Up to commit 8f99a16265353 ("MIPS: Tracing: Add IRQENTRY_EXIT section for
> > MIPS") `do_IRQ' used to be a macro, that's why.  At the time `do_IRQ' was
> > converted to a macro `dec_irq_dispatch' was created and previously this
> > place used to call `do_IRQ' too.
> > 
> >   It's always good finding out why things are as they are so as to make
> > sure you haven't been missing something.  This cleanup should have been
> > made along with commit 8f99a16265353, so it's pretty old a technical debt
> > being sorted here.
> > 
> >   Please add these findings to your commit description in v2.
> 
> Alright, thank you for the correction.
> 
> I do see that this commit has already been applied to mips-next.
> 
>  If it's alright with you and Thomas, I'm happy to send a patch v2 to
> include these details soon.

I'll drop the applied patch and take your v2.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]