Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] MIPS: Fix idle VS timer enqueue

[Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>]

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:44:10AM +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:38 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer
> <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> wrote:
> > do we really need that for a symbol local to that file ?
> 
> Not really, I can use the label directly.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:38 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer
> <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> wrote:
> >
> > > +       /* Check idle interrupt region size. */
> > > +       .ifne   __r4k_wait_exit - __r4k_wait - 36
> >
> > I have to say, that I prefer my .if statement, since this clearly spells out
> > the comparision in the expression. Is there a reason for your version ?
> 
> Sure, let's keep your version.
> Can we use the "error" message above? (""Idle interrupt region size
> mismatch: expected 36 bytes."").
> Or at least something similar, I think it is easier to understand the
> reason for the error. What do you think?

the error message works for me :-)

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]