From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: vernon2gm@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
ljs@kernel.org, nico.pache@linux.dev, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, usama.arif@linux.dev,
zokeefe@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: khugepaged: fix tracepoint UAF
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:25:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c4125f4-fbaa-43ad-9cc6-b9c5ae4af89f@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260815181632.21453-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>
Hi Lance,
On 8/16/26 2:16 AM, Lance Yang wrote:
> +Cc Baolin
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 01:44:44AM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 01:19:21PM +0800, Vernon Yang wrote:
>>> From: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
>>>
>>> The khugepaged tracepoints take a folio pointer and call folio_pfn(),
>>> but by then the folio may no longer be valid: freed after folio_put(),
>>> folio_unlock() or pte_unmap_unlock(), or not a folio at all but an
>>> xarray-encoded swap entry. On classic SPARSEMEM, dereferencing it oopses
>>> khugepaged as soon as the trace event is enabled; on other memory models
>>> it merely prints a bogus pfn.
>>>
>>> Pass the pfn to the tracepoints directly, captured while the folio is
>>> still pinned, closing the use-after-free windows in
>>> mm_khugepaged_scan_file(), mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd() and
>>> mm_khugepaged_collapse_file().
>>
>> Well spotted!
>>
>> Gave the series a run on x86_64 (KVM), all good (only classic SPARSEMEM
>> untested) :)
>
> Hmm ... stumbled over something else while testing this ...
>
> With tmpfs mounted huge=advise, one MADV_HUGEPAGE isn't enough to get
> an unregistered mm onto khugepaged's list. Do it twice, and khugepaged
> starts scanning right away.
>
> The pending flags make it into khugepaged just fine:
>
> int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> vm_flags_t *vm_flags, int advice)
> {
> switch (advice) {
> case MADV_HUGEPAGE:
> *vm_flags &= ~VM_NOHUGEPAGE;
> *vm_flags |= VM_HUGEPAGE;
> ...
> khugepaged_enter_vma(vma, *vm_flags);
> break;
> ...
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> and survive the common eligibility check:
>
> unsigned long __thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> vm_flags_t vm_flags,
> enum tva_type type,
> unsigned long orders)
> {
> ...
> /*
> * Enabled via shmem mount options or sysfs settings.
> * Must be done before hugepage flags check since shmem has its
> * own flags.
> */
> if (!in_pf && shmem_file(vma->vm_file))
> return orders & shmem_allowable_huge_orders(file_inode(vma->vm_file),
> vma, vma_start_pgoff(vma), 0,
> forced_collapse);
> ...
> }
>
> But then the shmem helper reads them back from the VMA:
>
> unsigned long shmem_allowable_huge_orders(struct inode *inode,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgoff_t index,
> loff_t write_end, bool shmem_huge_force)
> {
> ...
> vm_flags_t vm_flags = vma ? vma->vm_flags : 0;
> ...
> }
>
> At that point vma->vm_flags still has the old value, so huge=advise
> quietly gives us no allowable order.
>
> First madvise still succeeds, of course. The second one works because it
> finds VM_HUGEPAGE already installed by the first call.
>
> Looked at history too ... we've been here before. 2cf1338454a8 ("mm: fix
> khugepaged with shmem_enabled=advise") fixed this exact ordering bug and
> tagged cd89fb065099 as the culprit. Then 6beeab870e70 was meant to be
> "No functional changes", but moving shmem_huge_global_enabled() into
> shmem_allowable_huge_orders() seems to have wired the stale vma->vm_flags
> read back in.
>
> So AFAICT, this regressed in v6.12 with 6beeab870e70.
>
> @Baolin, does that ring a bell? Any reason shmem_allowable_huge_orders()
> can't just take the pending vm_flags as well?
Good catch. Sorry for my mistake. Would you like to send a fix?
Otherwise, I can fix it. Thanks for your report and analysis.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-15 5:19 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: khugepaged: fix tracepoint UAF Vernon Yang
2026-08-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: khugepaged: fix swap entry value to folio_pfn() Vernon Yang
2026-08-17 16:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-17 16:19 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-17 16:24 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-17 16:23 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-21 8:17 ` Vernon Yang
2026-08-21 17:09 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: khugepaged: fix folio is used after pte_unmap_unlock() Vernon Yang
2026-08-17 16:11 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-17 16:20 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-17 16:29 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-17 16:33 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-08-21 8:19 ` Vernon Yang
2026-08-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: khugepaged: fix folio is used after folio_put/unlock() Vernon Yang
2026-08-15 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: khugepaged: fix tracepoint UAF Lance Yang
2026-08-15 18:16 ` Lance Yang
2026-08-17 2:25 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2026-08-17 2:53 ` Lance Yang
2026-08-17 7:24 ` Baolin Wang
2026-08-17 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2026-08-21 6:03 ` Vernon Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c4125f4-fbaa-43ad-9cc6-b9c5ae4af89f@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vernon2gm@gmail.com \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox