* [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/slub: batch partial slab list operations
@ 2026-05-29 3:50 Hao Li
2026-05-29 3:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/slub: introduce helpers for node partial slab state Hao Li
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hao Li @ 2026-05-29 3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vbabka, harry, akpm
Cc: cl, rientjes, roman.gushchin, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Hao Li
The loops in get_partial_node_bulk() and __refill_objects_node() perform
individual list operations for each slab. This patchset optimize this.
Patch 1 is a cleanup patch that wraps duplicated code into helper
functions.
Patch 2 reduces the number of list operations by processing slabs in
batches, thereby minimizing the time spent inside the critical section.
Changes in v3:
- Reorder the two patches for better logical flow. (Thanks Vlastimil)
- Introduce set_node_partial_state for symmetry. (Thanks Vlastimil)
Changes in v2:
- Patch 1 applies the same optimization to __refill_objects_node. (Thanks
Harry and Vlastimil)
- Patch 2 introduces a helper to wraps duplicated code. (Thanks Harry)
Hao Li (2):
mm/slub: introduce helpers for node partial slab state
mm/slub: detach and reattach partial slabs in batch
mm/slub.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
base-commit: 6b41dc6749232c14f3e069f8115084a7bbeee402
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/slub: introduce helpers for node partial slab state
2026-05-29 3:50 [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/slub: batch partial slab list operations Hao Li
@ 2026-05-29 3:50 ` Hao Li
2026-05-29 3:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/slub: detach and reattach partial slabs in batch Hao Li
2026-05-29 8:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/slub: batch partial slab list operations Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hao Li @ 2026-05-29 3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vbabka, harry, akpm
Cc: cl, rientjes, roman.gushchin, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Hao Li
Wrap partial slab count inc/dec and flag set/clear into
helper functions to reduce code duplication.
Note that __add_partial() is called locklessly in
early_kmem_cache_node_alloc(), but since there is no such use case for
removal, __remove_partial() does not exist.
Suggested-by: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
---
mm/slub.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index b9f10b869914..45aa0a834f97 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -3521,15 +3521,21 @@ static inline void slab_clear_node_partial(struct slab *slab)
/*
* Management of partially allocated slabs.
*/
+static inline void set_node_partial_state(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
+ struct slab *slab)
+{
+ slab_set_node_partial(slab);
+ n->nr_partial++;
+}
+
static inline void
__add_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n, struct slab *slab, enum add_mode mode)
{
- n->nr_partial++;
if (mode == ADD_TO_TAIL)
list_add_tail(&slab->slab_list, &n->partial);
else
list_add(&slab->slab_list, &n->partial);
- slab_set_node_partial(slab);
+ set_node_partial_state(n, slab);
}
static inline void add_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
@@ -3539,13 +3545,19 @@ static inline void add_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
__add_partial(n, slab, mode);
}
+static inline void clear_node_partial_state(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
+ struct slab *slab)
+{
+ slab_clear_node_partial(slab);
+ n->nr_partial--;
+}
+
static inline void remove_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
struct slab *slab)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&n->list_lock);
list_del(&slab->slab_list);
- slab_clear_node_partial(slab);
- n->nr_partial--;
+ clear_node_partial_state(n, slab);
}
/*
@@ -8271,8 +8283,7 @@ static int __kmem_cache_do_shrink(struct kmem_cache *s)
if (free == slab->objects) {
list_move(&slab->slab_list, &discard);
- slab_clear_node_partial(slab);
- n->nr_partial--;
+ clear_node_partial_state(n, slab);
dec_slabs_node(s, node, slab->objects);
} else if (free <= SHRINK_PROMOTE_MAX)
list_move(&slab->slab_list, promote + free - 1);
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/slub: detach and reattach partial slabs in batch
2026-05-29 3:50 [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/slub: batch partial slab list operations Hao Li
2026-05-29 3:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/slub: introduce helpers for node partial slab state Hao Li
@ 2026-05-29 3:50 ` Hao Li
2026-05-29 8:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/slub: batch partial slab list operations Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hao Li @ 2026-05-29 3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vbabka, harry, akpm
Cc: cl, rientjes, roman.gushchin, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Hao Li
get_partial_node_bulk() moves each selected slab from the node's
partial list to the local pc->slabs list using a remove_partial() and
list_add() pair. In practice, the loop often detaches several adjacent
slabs. Doing this individually repeatedly manipulates list pointers
while holding n->list_lock, which causes unnecessary churn.
To demonstrate this, the counts below show how often single vs. multiple
consecutive slabs are retrieved during a will-it-scale mmap stress test:
consecutive_slabs_count frequency
= 1 277345324
= 2 335238023
= 3 175717884
>= 4 88862337
The data confirms that retrieving multiple contiguous slabs is highly
frequent.
To optimize this, track contiguous runs of matching slabs and move each
run in a single operation using list_bulk_move_tail(). This reduces list
pointer churn inside the lock critical section.
Apply the same optimization to __refill_objects_node() when reattaching
leftover partial slabs back to the node's partial list.
The will-it-scale mmap benchmark shows a 2% ~ 5% performance improvement
after applying this patch.
Signed-off-by: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
---
mm/slub.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 45aa0a834f97..4fdf5c36a69b 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -3751,6 +3751,7 @@ static bool get_partial_node_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s,
bool allow_spin)
{
struct slab *slab, *slab2;
+ struct slab *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
unsigned int total_free = 0;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -3769,8 +3770,15 @@ static bool get_partial_node_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s,
struct freelist_counters flc;
unsigned int slab_free;
- if (!pfmemalloc_match(slab, pc->flags))
+ if (!pfmemalloc_match(slab, pc->flags)) {
+ if (first) {
+ list_bulk_move_tail(&pc->slabs,
+ &first->slab_list,
+ &last->slab_list);
+ first = NULL;
+ }
continue;
+ }
/*
* determine the number of free objects in the slab racily
@@ -3787,15 +3795,20 @@ static bool get_partial_node_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s,
&& total_free + slab_free > pc->max_objects)
break;
- remove_partial(n, slab);
-
- list_add(&slab->slab_list, &pc->slabs);
+ if (!first)
+ first = slab;
+ last = slab;
+ clear_node_partial_state(n, slab);
total_free += slab_free;
if (total_free >= pc->max_objects)
break;
}
+ if (first)
+ list_bulk_move_tail(&pc->slabs, &first->slab_list,
+ &last->slab_list);
+
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
return total_free > 0;
}
@@ -7206,11 +7219,10 @@ __refill_objects_node(struct kmem_cache *s, void **p, gfp_t gfp, unsigned int mi
if (!list_empty(&pc.slabs)) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(slab, slab2, &pc.slabs, slab_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(slab, &pc.slabs, slab_list)
+ set_node_partial_state(n, slab);
- list_del(&slab->slab_list);
- add_partial(n, slab, ADD_TO_TAIL);
- }
+ list_splice_tail(&pc.slabs, &n->partial);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
}
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/slub: batch partial slab list operations
2026-05-29 3:50 [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/slub: batch partial slab list operations Hao Li
2026-05-29 3:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/slub: introduce helpers for node partial slab state Hao Li
2026-05-29 3:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/slub: detach and reattach partial slabs in batch Hao Li
@ 2026-05-29 8:01 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) @ 2026-05-29 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hao Li, harry, akpm; +Cc: cl, rientjes, roman.gushchin, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 5/29/26 05:50, Hao Li wrote:
> The loops in get_partial_node_bulk() and __refill_objects_node() perform
> individual list operations for each slab. This patchset optimize this.
>
> Patch 1 is a cleanup patch that wraps duplicated code into helper
> functions.
>
> Patch 2 reduces the number of list operations by processing slabs in
> batches, thereby minimizing the time spent inside the critical section.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Reorder the two patches for better logical flow. (Thanks Vlastimil)
> - Introduce set_node_partial_state for symmetry. (Thanks Vlastimil)
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Patch 1 applies the same optimization to __refill_objects_node. (Thanks
> Harry and Vlastimil)
> - Patch 2 introduces a helper to wraps duplicated code. (Thanks Harry)
>
> Hao Li (2):
> mm/slub: introduce helpers for node partial slab state
> mm/slub: detach and reattach partial slabs in batch
>
> mm/slub.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Applied to slab/for-next, thanks!
> base-commit: 6b41dc6749232c14f3e069f8115084a7bbeee402
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-29 8:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-29 3:50 [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/slub: batch partial slab list operations Hao Li
2026-05-29 3:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/slub: introduce helpers for node partial slab state Hao Li
2026-05-29 3:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/slub: detach and reattach partial slabs in batch Hao Li
2026-05-29 8:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/slub: batch partial slab list operations Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox