From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Dmitry Ilvokhin" <d@ilvokhin.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] mm: __access_remote_vm with per-VMA lock
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:02:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616190300.1509639-1-riel@surriel.com> (raw)
Sometimes processes can get stuck with the mmap_lock held for
a long time. This slows down, and can even prevent system monitoring
tools from assessing and logging the situation, because they themselves
end up getting stuck on the mmap_lock.
However, with the introduction of per-VMA locks, we can improve the
reliability of system monitoring, and generally speed up __access_remote_vm
under mmap_loc contention, by adding a fast path that does not require
the process-wide mmap_lock.
This fast path is only compiled in and used when it is safe to do so,
meaning a kernel with per-VMA locks, RCU pgae table freeing, the VMA
is not hugetlbfs, iomap, pfnmap, etc...
The code seems to work, but could still use some more cleaning up
and benchmarking.
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 19:02 Rik van Riel [this message]
2026-06-16 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/mm: use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE for mm->context.untag_mask Rik van Riel
2026-06-18 16:40 ` Usama Arif
2026-06-16 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/pagewalk: let folio_walk_start() run under the per-VMA lock Rik van Riel
2026-06-16 19:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: read remote memory without the mmap lock where possible Rik van Riel
2026-06-17 6:19 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-06-18 17:01 ` Usama Arif
2026-06-18 17:07 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-18 17:22 ` Usama Arif
2026-06-17 1:10 ` [PATCH 0/3] mm: __access_remote_vm with per-VMA lock Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-06-17 9:42 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-17 13:33 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-06-18 20:37 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616190300.1509639-1-riel@surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox