From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: linmiaohe@huawei.com
Cc: shivankg@amd.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
ljs@kernel.org, riel@surriel.com, liam@infradead.org,
vbabka@kernel.org, harry@kernel.org, jannh@google.com,
rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
ziy@nvidia.com, matthew.brost@intel.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,
rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com, gourry@gourry.net,
ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, apopple@nvidia.com,
kmanaouil.dev@gmail.com, fvdl@google.com, kinseyho@google.com,
weixugc@google.com, bharata@amd.com, rientjes@google.com,
dev.jain@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] mm/rmap: batch the unmap of large folios in try_to_migrate_one()
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 17:20:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260818092032.47670-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <860941c2-287f-f88f-920c-6d99e2cd4483@huawei.com>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 04:55:06PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>On 2026/8/17 17:14, Lance Yang wrote:
>> +Cc Miaohe
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 04:23:18AM +0000, Shivank Garg wrote:
>>> try_to_migrate_one() converts present PTEs to migration entries one at a
>>> time. For a PTE-mapped large folio, this repeat calls to ptep clear+flush,
>>> the migration entry build and set, folio_remove_rmap_pte() and folio_put(),
>>> each re-entering page_vma_mapped_walk() once per base page (256 times for
>>> 1M folio).
>>>
>>> Mirror try_to_unmap_one() to introduce folio_migrate_pte_batch() to detect
>>> eligible batch for PTEs mapping conseuctive subpages of a large folios,
>>> and convert the whole batch in one shot using the batched helpers.
>>>
>>> A side-effect of this change is trace_set_migration_pte() will record
>>> one event per batched run instead of earlier behavior of one per base page.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> mm/rmap.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
>>> index 35752a70f3a0..63b885c0b7ef 100644
>>> --- a/mm/rmap.c
>>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
>>> @@ -2675,6 +2675,44 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_hugetlb_one(struct folio *folio,
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static inline unsigned int folio_migrate_pte_batch(struct folio *folio,
>>> + struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, pte_t pte,
>>> + struct page *subpage, bool anon_exclusive)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned long end_addr, addr = pvmw->address;
>>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma = pvmw->vma;
>>> + unsigned int max_nr, nr;
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_UNMAP_ONE
>>> + /* Cannot batch unmap if arch_unmap_one() is defined. */
>>> + return 1;
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> + if (!folio_test_large(folio))
>>> + return 1;
>>> + if (folio_is_zone_device(folio) || folio_test_has_hwpoisoned(folio))
>>> + return 1;
>>> + if (pte_unused(pte))
>>> + return 1;
>>> +
>>> + /* We may only batch within a single VMA and a single page table. */
>>> + end_addr = pmd_addr_end(addr, vma->vm_end);
>>> + max_nr = (end_addr - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>
>> Hmm ... can this still batch over a poisoned tail page?
>>
>> memory_failure() sets PageHWPoison() before taking folio lock, but
>> cannot set PG_has_hwpoisoned until it acquires and releases that lock.
>>
>> So tail page can already be poisoned while folio_test_has_hwpoisoned()
>> still returns false ... no?
>
>When memory error hits thp pages, memory_failure() first set PG_has_hwpoisoned and
>then tries to split thp pages. And try_to_migrate() will be called to set migration
>entries for anon pages. Does folio_migrate_pte_batch() work on this case? If so, the
>folio_test_has_hwpoisoned() check above could catch the bad pages?
>
>Or do you worry about the scene that meory error hits a thp while it's under migration?
Yeah, latter case is exactly what I meant.
try_to_migrate() is called with folio lock held. If migration already
owns the lock, memory_failure() can set PageHWPoison() on a tail page and
then block in folio_lock(), before reaching folio_set_has_hwpoisoned().
try_to_migrate_one() may meanwhile start from a healthy subpage, see
PageHWPoison(subpage) clear and PG_has_hwpoisoned still clear, then batch
across poisoned tail and install a normal migration entry for it.
Once memory_failure() publishes PG_has_hwpoisoned, the folio-level check
does stop batching, as you said. It's just this window before publication
that worries me ...
Thanks, Lance
>Thanks both.
>.
>
>>
>> Starting from a healthy first subpage, folio_migrate_pte_batch() can
>> then batch across poisoned tail page. hwpoison only describes first
>> subpage, so set_softleaf_ptes() installs a normal migration entry for
>> poisoned page instead of an HWPoison entry ...
>>
>> Should folio_migrate_pte_batch() check PageHWPoison() on every candidate
>> subpage and stop before a poisoned one?
>>
>> Cheers, Lance
>>
>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * If unmap fails, we need to restore the ptes. To avoid accidentally
>>> + * upgrading write permissions for ptes that were not originally writable,
>>> + * and to avoid losing the soft-dirty bit, use the appropriate FPB flags.
>>> + */
>>> + nr = folio_pte_batch_flags(folio, vma, pvmw->pte, &pte, max_nr,
>>> + FPB_RESPECT_WRITE | FPB_RESPECT_SOFT_DIRTY);
>>> +
>>> + /* Limit possible batch count to a uniform PageAnonExclusive value */
>>> + if (folio_test_anon(folio))
>>> + nr = page_anon_exclusive_batch(0, nr, subpage, anon_exclusive);
>>> +
>>> + return nr;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * @arg: enum ttu_flags will be passed to this argument.
>>> *
>>> @@ -2686,12 +2724,12 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> {
>>> struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
>>> DEFINE_FOLIO_VMA_WALK(pvmw, folio, vma, address, 0);
>>> - bool anon_exclusive, writable, ret = true;
>>> + bool anon_exclusive, hwpoison, writable, ret = true;
>>> pte_t pteval;
>>> struct page *subpage;
>>> struct mmu_notifier_range range;
>>> enum ttu_flags flags = (enum ttu_flags)(long)arg;
>>> - unsigned long pfn;
>>> + unsigned long pfn, end_addr, nr_pages;
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * When racing against e.g. zap_pte_range() on another cpu,
>>> @@ -2744,11 +2782,8 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_hugetlb(folio) ||
>>> !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio), folio);
>>>
>>> - if (set_pmd_migration_entry(&pvmw, subpage)) {
>>> - ret = false;
>>> - page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
>>> - break;
>>> - }
>>> + if (set_pmd_migration_entry(&pvmw, subpage))
>>> + goto walk_abort;
>>> continue;
>>> #endif
>>> }
>>> @@ -2773,10 +2808,25 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> subpage = folio_page(folio, pfn - folio_pfn(folio));
>>> anon_exclusive = folio_test_anon(folio) &&
>>> PageAnonExclusive(subpage);
>>> + /*
>>> + * memory_failure() can set PageHWPoison concurrently without holding
>>> + * the folio lock. Snapshot the flag here to decide whether to batch
>>> + * PTEs or install hwpoison entry.
>>> + */
>>> + hwpoison = PageHWPoison(subpage);
>>>
>>> + nr_pages = 1;
>>> if (likely(pte_present(pteval))) {
>>> - flush_cache_page(vma, address, pfn);
>>> - /* Nuke the page table entry. */
>>> + if (!hwpoison)
>>> + nr_pages = folio_migrate_pte_batch(folio, &pvmw,
>>> + pteval, subpage,
>>> + anon_exclusive);
>>> +
>>> + end_addr = address + nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
>>> + flush_cache_range(vma, address, end_addr);
>>> +
>>> + /* Nuke the page table entries. */
>>> + pteval = get_and_clear_ptes(mm, address, pvmw.pte, nr_pages);
>>> if (should_defer_flush(mm, flags)) {
>>> /*
>>> * We clear the PTE but do not flush so potentially
>>> @@ -2786,11 +2836,9 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> * transition on a cached TLB entry is written through
>>> * and traps if the PTE is unmapped.
>>> */
>>> - pteval = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, address, pvmw.pte);
>>> -
>>> - set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(mm, pteval, address, address + PAGE_SIZE);
>>> + set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(mm, pteval, address, end_addr);
>>> } else {
>>> - pteval = ptep_clear_flush(vma, address, pvmw.pte);
>>> + flush_tlb_range(vma, address, end_addr);
>>> }
>>> if (pte_dirty(pteval))
>>> folio_mark_dirty(folio);
>>> @@ -2809,7 +2857,8 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> /* Update high watermark before we lower rss */
>>> update_hiwater_rss(mm);
>>>
>>> - if (PageHWPoison(subpage)) {
>>> + if (hwpoison) {
>>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(nr_pages != 1);
>>> VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_is_device_private(folio), folio);
>>>
>>> pteval = swp_entry_to_pte(make_hwpoison_entry(subpage));
>>> @@ -2837,19 +2886,15 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> * so we'll not check/care.
>>> */
>>> if (arch_unmap_one(mm, vma, address, pteval) < 0) {
>>> - set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
>>> - ret = false;
>>> - page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
>>> - break;
>>> + set_ptes(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval, nr_pages);
>>> + goto walk_abort;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - /* See folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte(): clear PTE first. */
>>> + /* See folio_try_share_anon_rmap_ptes(): clear PTE first. */
>>> if (anon_exclusive &&
>>> - folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte(folio, subpage)) {
>>> - set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
>>> - ret = false;
>>> - page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
>>> - break;
>>> + folio_try_share_anon_rmap_ptes(folio, subpage, nr_pages)) {
>>> + set_ptes(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval, nr_pages);
>>> + goto walk_abort;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -2859,19 +2904,31 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> */
>>> swp_pte = make_migration_pte(subpage, pteval,
>>> writable, anon_exclusive);
>>> - set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, swp_pte);
>>> trace_set_migration_pte(address, pte_val(swp_pte),
>>> folio_order(folio));
>>> +
>>> + /* Set nr_pages migration entries, advancing the PFN. */
>>> + set_softleaf_ptes(mm, address, pvmw.pte, swp_pte, nr_pages);
>>> /*
>>> * No need to invalidate here it will synchronize on
>>> * against the special swap migration pte.
>>> */
>>> }
>>>
>>> - folio_remove_rmap_pte(folio, subpage, vma);
>>> - if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
>>> - mlock_drain_local();
>>> - folio_put(folio);
>>> + finish_folio_unmap(vma, folio, subpage, nr_pages);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * If we batched the entire folio, there is nothing left to
>>> + * walk; stop right here.
>>> + */
>>> + if (nr_pages == folio_nr_pages(folio))
>>> + goto walk_done;
>>> + continue;
>>> +walk_abort:
>>> + ret = false;
>>> +walk_done:
>>> + page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
>>> + break;
>>> }
>>>
>>> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.43.0
>>>
>>>
>> .
>>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 4:23 [PATCH v2 0/7] mm: batch rmap walks during large folio migration Shivank Garg
2026-08-13 4:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: factor out generic PTE batch detection from swap_pte_batch() Shivank Garg
2026-08-13 9:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-14 8:00 ` Garg, Shivank
2026-08-16 7:48 ` Garg, Shivank
2026-08-13 4:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm/migrate: factor out migration PTE construction Shivank Garg
2026-08-13 4:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm/migrate: split remove_migration_pte_hugetlb() out of remove_migration_pte() Shivank Garg
2026-08-13 4:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mm/migrate: batch the restore-side migration rmap walk Shivank Garg
2026-08-13 4:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mm/rmap: factor out migration PTE construction Shivank Garg
2026-08-13 4:23 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/rmap: split try_to_migrate_hugetlb_one() out of try_to_migrate_one() Shivank Garg
2026-08-13 4:23 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm/rmap: batch the unmap of large folios in try_to_migrate_one() Shivank Garg
2026-08-17 9:14 ` Lance Yang
2026-08-18 8:55 ` Miaohe Lin
2026-08-18 9:20 ` Lance Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260818092032.47670-1-lance.yang@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kinseyho@google.com \
--cc=kmanaouil.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shivankg@amd.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox