Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>, <shivankg@amd.com>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <david@kernel.org>, <ljs@kernel.org>,
	<riel@surriel.com>, <liam@infradead.org>, <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	<harry@kernel.org>, <jannh@google.com>, <rppt@kernel.org>,
	<surenb@google.com>, <mhocko@suse.com>, <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	<matthew.brost@intel.com>, <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
	<rakie.kim@sk.com>, <byungchul@sk.com>, <gourry@gourry.net>,
	<ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>, <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	<kmanaouil.dev@gmail.com>, <fvdl@google.com>,
	<kinseyho@google.com>, <weixugc@google.com>, <bharata@amd.com>,
	<rientjes@google.com>, <dev.jain@arm.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] mm/rmap: batch the unmap of large folios in try_to_migrate_one()
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 16:55:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <860941c2-287f-f88f-920c-6d99e2cd4483@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817091444.58876-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>

On 2026/8/17 17:14, Lance Yang wrote:
> +Cc Miaohe
> 
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 04:23:18AM +0000, Shivank Garg wrote:
>> try_to_migrate_one() converts present PTEs to migration entries one at a
>> time. For a PTE-mapped large folio, this repeat calls to ptep clear+flush,
>> the migration entry build and set, folio_remove_rmap_pte() and folio_put(),
>> each re-entering page_vma_mapped_walk() once per base page (256 times for
>> 1M folio).
>>
>> Mirror try_to_unmap_one() to introduce folio_migrate_pte_batch() to detect
>> eligible batch for PTEs mapping conseuctive subpages of a large folios,
>> and convert the whole batch in one shot using the batched helpers.
>>
>> A side-effect of this change is trace_set_migration_pte() will record
>> one event per batched run instead of earlier behavior of one per base page.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
>> ---
>> mm/rmap.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
>> index 35752a70f3a0..63b885c0b7ef 100644
>> --- a/mm/rmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
>> @@ -2675,6 +2675,44 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_hugetlb_one(struct folio *folio,
>> 	return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline unsigned int folio_migrate_pte_batch(struct folio *folio,
>> +		struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, pte_t pte,
>> +		struct page *subpage, bool anon_exclusive)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long end_addr, addr = pvmw->address;
>> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma = pvmw->vma;
>> +	unsigned int max_nr, nr;
>> +
>> +#ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_UNMAP_ONE
>> +	/* Cannot batch unmap if arch_unmap_one() is defined. */
>> +	return 1;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	if (!folio_test_large(folio))
>> +		return 1;
>> +	if (folio_is_zone_device(folio) || folio_test_has_hwpoisoned(folio))
>> +		return 1;
>> +	if (pte_unused(pte))
>> +		return 1;
>> +
>> +	/* We may only batch within a single VMA and a single page table. */
>> +	end_addr = pmd_addr_end(addr, vma->vm_end);
>> +	max_nr = (end_addr - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> 
> Hmm ... can this still batch over a poisoned tail page?
> 
> memory_failure() sets PageHWPoison() before taking folio lock, but
> cannot set PG_has_hwpoisoned until it acquires and releases that lock.
> 
> So tail page can already be poisoned while folio_test_has_hwpoisoned()
> still returns false ... no?

When memory error hits thp pages, memory_failure() first set PG_has_hwpoisoned and
then tries to split thp pages. And try_to_migrate() will be called to set migration
entries for anon pages. Does folio_migrate_pte_batch() work on this case? If so, the
folio_test_has_hwpoisoned() check above could catch the bad pages?

Or do you worry about the scene that meory error hits a thp while it's under migration?

Thanks both.
.

> 
> Starting from a healthy first subpage, folio_migrate_pte_batch() can
> then batch across poisoned tail page. hwpoison only describes first
> subpage, so set_softleaf_ptes() installs a normal migration entry for
> poisoned page instead of an HWPoison entry ...
> 
> Should folio_migrate_pte_batch() check PageHWPoison() on every candidate
> subpage and stop before a poisoned one?
> 
> Cheers, Lance
> 
> 
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If unmap fails, we need to restore the ptes. To avoid accidentally
>> +	 * upgrading write permissions for ptes that were not originally writable,
>> +	 * and to avoid losing the soft-dirty bit, use the appropriate FPB flags.
>> +	 */
>> +	nr = folio_pte_batch_flags(folio, vma, pvmw->pte, &pte, max_nr,
>> +				   FPB_RESPECT_WRITE | FPB_RESPECT_SOFT_DIRTY);
>> +
>> +	/* Limit possible batch count to a uniform PageAnonExclusive value */
>> +	if (folio_test_anon(folio))
>> +		nr = page_anon_exclusive_batch(0, nr, subpage, anon_exclusive);
>> +
>> +	return nr;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>>  * @arg: enum ttu_flags will be passed to this argument.
>>  *
>> @@ -2686,12 +2724,12 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> {
>> 	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
>> 	DEFINE_FOLIO_VMA_WALK(pvmw, folio, vma, address, 0);
>> -	bool anon_exclusive, writable, ret = true;
>> +	bool anon_exclusive, hwpoison, writable, ret = true;
>> 	pte_t pteval;
>> 	struct page *subpage;
>> 	struct mmu_notifier_range range;
>> 	enum ttu_flags flags = (enum ttu_flags)(long)arg;
>> -	unsigned long pfn;
>> +	unsigned long pfn, end_addr, nr_pages;
>>
>> 	/*
>> 	 * When racing against e.g. zap_pte_range() on another cpu,
>> @@ -2744,11 +2782,8 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> 			VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_hugetlb(folio) ||
>> 					!folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio), folio);
>>
>> -			if (set_pmd_migration_entry(&pvmw, subpage)) {
>> -				ret = false;
>> -				page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
>> -				break;
>> -			}
>> +			if (set_pmd_migration_entry(&pvmw, subpage))
>> +				goto walk_abort;
>> 			continue;
>> #endif
>> 		}
>> @@ -2773,10 +2808,25 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> 		subpage = folio_page(folio, pfn - folio_pfn(folio));
>> 		anon_exclusive = folio_test_anon(folio) &&
>> 				 PageAnonExclusive(subpage);
>> +		/*
>> +		 * memory_failure() can set PageHWPoison concurrently without holding
>> +		 * the folio lock. Snapshot the flag here to decide whether to batch
>> +		 * PTEs or install hwpoison entry.
>> +		 */
>> +		hwpoison = PageHWPoison(subpage);
>>
>> +		nr_pages = 1;
>> 		if (likely(pte_present(pteval))) {
>> -			flush_cache_page(vma, address, pfn);
>> -			/* Nuke the page table entry. */
>> +			if (!hwpoison)
>> +				nr_pages = folio_migrate_pte_batch(folio, &pvmw,
>> +								   pteval, subpage,
>> +								   anon_exclusive);
>> +
>> +			end_addr = address + nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
>> +			flush_cache_range(vma, address, end_addr);
>> +
>> +			/* Nuke the page table entries. */
>> +			pteval = get_and_clear_ptes(mm, address, pvmw.pte, nr_pages);
>> 			if (should_defer_flush(mm, flags)) {
>> 				/*
>> 				 * We clear the PTE but do not flush so potentially
>> @@ -2786,11 +2836,9 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> 				 * transition on a cached TLB entry is written through
>> 				 * and traps if the PTE is unmapped.
>> 				 */
>> -				pteval = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, address, pvmw.pte);
>> -
>> -				set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(mm, pteval, address, address + PAGE_SIZE);
>> +				set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(mm, pteval, address, end_addr);
>> 			} else {
>> -				pteval = ptep_clear_flush(vma, address, pvmw.pte);
>> +				flush_tlb_range(vma, address, end_addr);
>> 			}
>> 			if (pte_dirty(pteval))
>> 				folio_mark_dirty(folio);
>> @@ -2809,7 +2857,8 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> 		/* Update high watermark before we lower rss */
>> 		update_hiwater_rss(mm);
>>
>> -		if (PageHWPoison(subpage)) {
>> +		if (hwpoison) {
>> +			VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(nr_pages != 1);
>> 			VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_is_device_private(folio), folio);
>>
>> 			pteval = swp_entry_to_pte(make_hwpoison_entry(subpage));
>> @@ -2837,19 +2886,15 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> 			 * so we'll not check/care.
>> 			 */
>> 			if (arch_unmap_one(mm, vma, address, pteval) < 0) {
>> -				set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
>> -				ret = false;
>> -				page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
>> -				break;
>> +				set_ptes(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval, nr_pages);
>> +				goto walk_abort;
>> 			}
>>
>> -			/* See folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte(): clear PTE first. */
>> +			/* See folio_try_share_anon_rmap_ptes(): clear PTE first. */
>> 			if (anon_exclusive &&
>> -			    folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte(folio, subpage)) {
>> -				set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
>> -				ret = false;
>> -				page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
>> -				break;
>> +			    folio_try_share_anon_rmap_ptes(folio, subpage, nr_pages)) {
>> +				set_ptes(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval, nr_pages);
>> +				goto walk_abort;
>> 			}
>>
>> 			/*
>> @@ -2859,19 +2904,31 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> 			 */
>> 			swp_pte = make_migration_pte(subpage, pteval,
>> 						     writable, anon_exclusive);
>> -			set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, swp_pte);
>> 			trace_set_migration_pte(address, pte_val(swp_pte),
>> 						folio_order(folio));
>> +
>> +			/* Set nr_pages migration entries, advancing the PFN. */
>> +			set_softleaf_ptes(mm, address, pvmw.pte, swp_pte, nr_pages);
>> 			/*
>> 			 * No need to invalidate here it will synchronize on
>> 			 * against the special swap migration pte.
>> 			 */
>> 		}
>>
>> -		folio_remove_rmap_pte(folio, subpage, vma);
>> -		if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
>> -			mlock_drain_local();
>> -		folio_put(folio);
>> +		finish_folio_unmap(vma, folio, subpage, nr_pages);
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * If we batched the entire folio, there is nothing left to
>> +		 * walk; stop right here.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (nr_pages == folio_nr_pages(folio))
>> +			goto walk_done;
>> +		continue;
>> +walk_abort:
>> +		ret = false;
>> +walk_done:
>> +		page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
>> +		break;
>> 	}
>>
>> 	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>
>>
> .
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-18  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-13  4:23 [PATCH v2 0/7] mm: batch rmap walks during large folio migration Shivank Garg
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: factor out generic PTE batch detection from swap_pte_batch() Shivank Garg
2026-08-13  9:57   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-14  8:00     ` Garg, Shivank
2026-08-16  7:48       ` Garg, Shivank
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm/migrate: factor out migration PTE construction Shivank Garg
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm/migrate: split remove_migration_pte_hugetlb() out of remove_migration_pte() Shivank Garg
2026-08-19 11:24   ` Karim Manaouil
2026-08-19 17:49     ` Garg, Shivank
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mm/migrate: batch the restore-side migration rmap walk Shivank Garg
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mm/rmap: factor out migration PTE construction Shivank Garg
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/rmap: split try_to_migrate_hugetlb_one() out of try_to_migrate_one() Shivank Garg
2026-08-13  4:23 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm/rmap: batch the unmap of large folios in try_to_migrate_one() Shivank Garg
2026-08-17  9:14   ` Lance Yang
2026-08-18  8:55     ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2026-08-18  9:20       ` Lance Yang
2026-08-19  9:05         ` Miaohe Lin
2026-08-19  9:42         ` Huang, Ying
2026-08-19  9:57           ` Lance Yang
2026-08-19 10:09           ` Garg, Shivank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=860941c2-287f-f88f-920c-6d99e2cd4483@huawei.com \
    --to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bharata@amd.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=fvdl@google.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kinseyho@google.com \
    --cc=kmanaouil.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shivankg@amd.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox